Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

SM58 or SM58 Beta?


lollington
 Share

Recommended Posts

The beta is a bit brighter and is a bit hotter.

You can't really go wrong with a standard 58, great mic. I've used both live, as an engineer and as a performer, didn't make much difference to me either way really. I've heard some say that the beta is a little less prone to feeding back but I couldn't really tell the difference to be honest. Whichever you get you won't be disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other important difference between the SM58 and the Beta 58A is the polar pattern. The SM58 is cardioid and the Beta 58A is supercardioid. The Beta 58A has superior side rejection at the cost of some pickup directly behind it.

To quote Wikipedia's page about the Beta 58A - "As with any supercardioid pattern microphone, stage monitors should be placed between 30 and 60 degrees to one side of the microphone rather than directly on axis to its rear." It is also apparently less sensitive to proximity effect (the increase in low frequency response when sound source is close to the microphone) because frequencies below 500Hz are attenuated in some way.

Edited by neepheid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a sound guy using Beta 58's - the singer needs to be right on that mic - any lateral movement and it drops away completely. It doesn't work for our keyboard player, as the moment she looks down or reaches up or down the keyboard, it doesn't pick her up nearly as well. That's the supercardioid pattern. It's a great mic otherwise, but unless you're eating the mic all the time, the 58 might be be a better bet. If feedback from monitors is a problem, it would also work well (I've never had any bother with feedback with them).
Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a Beta 57 on stage (the 57 suits my voice better than the 58) and I tend to sing with my lips more-or-less touching the basket.

The Beta is definitely less prone to feedback, and it's built like a tank, but I have to second the point above about turning your head away. If I glance down at the frets while playing, my voice disappears for a beat/note/syllable apparently.

This not something you tend to notice when testing a mic (in a shop, say) before deciding to buy.

I really like my mic and I don't plan to ditch it, but realistically if I was starting again I would buy a standard 57.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My old band had a 'standard' set of 58's for all 5 singers but one day the female lead turned up with a Beta. Sounded great in rehearsal but we had real problems with it live, prone to dropping out (must have been the pattern issues mentioned above) but also gave us some feedback problems.

I'm sure it's a fine mic but we definitely found it less 'forgiving' to work with than a standard 58. It went back the next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try before buying, when we bought singer (female) mic we started of thinking shure sm58 etc. Guy in store spent much time suggesting various ones and set them up to try. There is a difference, some mics seemed to suit her voice much better. We bought AKG D5 and are very pleased. As ever try before handing loot over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='lollington' timestamp='1336659503' post='1649068']
Hello folks

Does anyone have experience using both the SM58 and SM58 Beta microphones from Shure? This will be my first stage mic and I wonder if there is much benefit in splashing out a few extra $$$ for the beta.

Cheers :)
[/quote]


The 58 is just a little 'muddier' in the lows compared to the cleaner and crisper Beta.
They are industry 'standard' because although very good, I think their advertising helps sell more than anyone else.
We can tend to forget a few other makes.....Electrovoice N/Ds (758??) as used by a singer
I work with, an excellent mic for 'his' voice which is bluesy deep and growly. There is also a Beyer model quoted to me just yesterday
that was used by many singers that was considered a top mic. I recently bought a Rode M1which is also very good that I prefer for BVs over the 58
as it is just that little cleaner in the lows.
Be wary that Shure is probably the most 'pirated/copied' mic on the planet. Shure say they regularly close 'fake' factories in China
with the help of the Chinese authorities. Their website can help you ascertain a real and a fake but even Shure's mic weight
specifications seem not to be correct and I think this is to confuse the fakers (sic!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='pietruszka' timestamp='1336727140' post='1649948']
Yep! They're industry standard for a reason.
[/quote]

Because they've been around a long time and don't break.

Edited by stevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

+1 for the AKG D5. I'm with Stevie on this one Shure's are popular because we all know them and they don't break (nothing wrong with that of course) Would you buy a car because it was the best available in the 1960's or has technology moved on? EV ND767a worth a look too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...