Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

So, who can name the various bits and bobs.....


Recommended Posts

Posted

[quote name='bremen' timestamp='1353339588' post='1873825']
Trim those strings, makes my eyes water just looking at them ;)
[/quote]

I don't have it yet, so it was definitely NOT me who put the strings etc on.... I'm getting it as a project in a week or two. Just trying to figure out WHAT manufacturers the neck/body/pups may be. Have a paint job in mind, and bridge type. Just need to figure out what it is.

Posted

[quote name='Low End Bee' timestamp='1353339880' post='1873834']
I think I see some of my old school desk in there.
[/quote]
Yeah, the Plywood is a bit rough, but after it's painted, smoothed and set up, who knows what it may sound like ;)

Posted

[quote name='chrismuzz' timestamp='1353340277' post='1873849']
That nut is shockingly bad, look at the string spacing!
[/quote]

You noticed that too eh? :-p Even if it's a non player, It will hang on the wall!

Posted

[quote name='Low End Bee' timestamp='1353339880' post='1873834']
I think I see some of my old school desk in there.
[/quote]

Funny you should say that, I've got a guitar that my Dad built from worktops from the science department at my secondary school. My Dad worked there at the time, so when they tore all these solid wood worktops out, he took the lot. This was about 10 years ago, and he's just got through that stock.

The wood actually turned out to be something like a darker korina once all the varnish and graffiti was sanded off!

OT: I do recognise that headstock shape, but I'm damned if I can remember which budget make I've seen it on... Have to say, not too keen on the bridge saddles, though.

Posted

If you are really lucky the pickups might be DiMarzio.

As for the rest of it does it really matter? I would imagine that standard Fender style parts can be made to fit if you need to replace anything.

Posted

[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1353341112' post='1873885']
If you are really lucky the pickups might be DiMarzio.

[/quote]

+1 on that I've got the same in my P - and tremendous they are too.

New neck on that mate and it'll be a keeper I reckon.

Posted

[quote name='yorks5stringer' timestamp='1353368343' post='1874431']
Yep, if bought from eBay it will be a genuine Fender.....as they weed out dodgy fakes with a ruthless fevour.
[/quote]

Post of the year for me that! :D

Posted

[quote name='Dr M' timestamp='1353340742' post='1873870']


The wood actually turned out to be something like a darker korina once all the varnish and graffiti was sanded off!

[/quote]

I work with reclaimed woods quite a bit - any old science benches I've come across have been either teak or iroko, which would fit your description.

Posted (edited)

OK, when I set my large-screen to view @400%, I have a few observations:

1) The neck seems to be a real Fender neck with the "bullet" truss rod that has had the headstock shaved, but I can't tell anything about the model. It could be anything from a '70's P-neck to one of the more recent MIM, MIJ, or Squier necks that use the same truss rod.
2) The body seems to be an inexpensive copy plywood body that has been stripped and refinished. The P-J configuration may actually be original. If not, the woodworking is good quality. I actually like plywood bodies if they are light weight and overall resonant, because laminations tend to cancel resonances that cause dead spots. Remember: even Gibson ES175 and Epiphone Casino guitars are laminate (plywood) tops, so it's not that it is made of plywood, it is the quality of the plywood.
3) The D string slot seems to be there and the string simply dislodged out of the slot. There may be more damage to the nut that it won't stay in the slot, but that's at the limit of resolution and I can't say for sure.
4) The pickups may very well be DiMarzio P and J pickups. A good combination, because the J is an end-to-end coil humbucker that matches the P, and it seems to be wired V-V-T-jack, which is the easiest, most versatile combination for stage use. (less risk of grabbing the wrong knob in the middle of a set or a song).

Comment: as with any project, make sure the overall cost of acquisition and time/labour factored in are reasonable. It's difficult to identify a project that needs just the right balance of time and money to be a good deal, and it is too easy to get a bucket of parts and overspend putting it back together when a reasonable used bass with a couple of personal modifications would actually be less expensive in the long run, be a better playing bass, and have better resale value.

Edited by iiipopes
Posted (edited)

[quote name='iiipopes' timestamp='1353603437' post='1876520']
OK, when I set my large-screen to view @400%, I have a few observations:

1) The neck seems to be a real Fender neck with the "bullet" truss rod that has had the headstock shaved, but I can't tell anything about the model. It could be anything from a '70's P-neck to one of the more recent MIM, MIJ, or Squier necks that use the same truss rod.
2) The body seems to be an inexpensive copy plywood body that has been stripped and refinished. The P-J configuration may actually be original. If not, the woodworking is good quality. I actually like plywood bodies if they are light weight and overall resonant, because laminations tend to cancel resonances that cause dead spots. Remember: even Gibson ES175 and Epiphone Casino guitars are laminate (plywood) tops, so it's not that it is made of plywood, it is the quality of the plywood.
3) The D string slot seems to be there and the string simply dislodged out of the slot. There may be more damage to the nut that it won't stay in the slot, but that's at the limit of resolution and I can't say for sure.
4) The pickups may very well be DiMarzio P and J pickups. A good combination, because the J is an end-to-end coil humbucker that matches the P, and it seems to be wired V-V-T-jack, which is the easiest, most versatile combination for stage use. (less risk of grabbing the wrong knob in the middle of a set or a song).

Comment: as with any project, make sure the overall cost of acquisition and time/labour factored in are reasonable. It's difficult to identify a project that needs just the right balance of time and money to be a good deal, and it is too easy to get a bucket of parts and overspend putting it back together when a reasonable used bass with a couple of personal modifications would actually be less expensive in the long run, be a better playing bass, and have better resale value.
[/quote]

^^^ THIS!!

I'm getting the bass for free off a friend. Nut and bridge replacement will be sorted, and all the paint and finish will be done by me, so not too costly ;)

Apparently the wiring is OK from what he can see. I'll bring a mini amp up to test it. Could be a fun little project :)

Cheers for the help! Here's a closeup.

Edited by deefer_dog
Posted

[quote name='iiipopes' timestamp='1353603437' post='1876520']
1) The neck seems to be a real Fender neck with the "bullet" truss rod that has had the headstock shaved, but I can't tell anything about the model. It could be anything from a '70's P-neck to one of the more recent MIM, MIJ, or Squier necks that use the same truss rod.
[/quote]

Real Fender neck?, really?? <_<

Rosewood board, flat square heel, dots, bullet truss?

Not for me.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...