Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

In no particular order a 1970's Maya, a 2012 US FSR with hand stained body, and a lightweight bitsa (MightyMite Neck, wizard p'ups,generic Gotoh 201 copy bridge and Lightweight body incorporating a metal sustain block under the bridge. All strung with new Fender 9050CL Flats. Can you tell which is which

[url="https://soundcloud.com/davelee-3/bass-test"]https://soundcloud.c...lee-3/bass-test[/url]

Number 1 [spoiler]2012 US FSR Precision....[/spoiler]
Number 2 [spoiler]Mighty Mite Bitsa..............[/spoiler]
Number 3 [spoiler]1970's Maya Electric Bass[/spoiler]

Edited by Nibody
Posted

Just to add they are all going into Amplitube3 totaly flat - no eq, no effects, no amp sim. Sorry about the clicking - my PC is about on its knees!

Posted

[quote name='KiOgon' timestamp='1359624128' post='1957603']
'60 P's - which is which?
[url="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/kjon51/20130131_091609.jpg"]http://img.photobuck...0131_091609.jpg[/url]
:lol:
[/quote]

:rolleyes: :lol:

Posted

Absolutely no idea which is which, but in order of preference I choose 1, then 2, then 3. 2 and 3 sound too bright for my liking.

Nice choice to play, I do like Radar Love, its always in our set! :)

Posted

Ok, I'll be the first to make a fool of myself :-D
1 was my favourite, smooth with a full bottom.
2 I found a bit harsh on top and slightly lacking on bottom
3 felt more 'modern' with tight bottom and clear top.

Now for the tricky bit.....
1 - the Maya
2 - the Bitsa
3 - the US P

Posted

[quote name='jaydentaku' timestamp='1359626277' post='1957657']
I enjoyed listening to what you have done. It is interesting, but for me technique is far too great a factor.
[/quote]

How so?

Posted

Only got it through tiny pc speakers, but I would put:

1. US P Bass
2. A bit modern sounding, so would go with the Bitsa
3. leaves the Maya

I will revisit this later on, through proper speakers though.

Posted

Well, in my opinion.The only way to truly compare something, like in an experiment, there must be a control, a non-variable. The way in which you play and where you play, how much or how little you dig in, how hard you pluck or how smoothly cannot be guarantee uniform, we are human after all.

I think you played the first one very smoothly and was your best, the second slightly harder and percussive and the last one, much like the first.

If people are really interested in going to the nth degree and doing comparrisons, there needs to be a control. The control would have to be a mechanical devive to guarantee consistancy. But thats kinda silly in my eye. But then, I don't get the need to take things to this degree, its mostly about the fingers.

My tuppenceworth.

I do hope I haven't created outrage, though this is basschat.

Posted

[quote name='jaydentaku' timestamp='1359628069' post='1957705']
Well, in my opinion.The only way to truly compare something, like in an experiment, there must be a control, a non-variable. The way in which you play and where you play, how much or how little you dig in, how hard you pluck or how smoothly cannot be guarantee uniform, we are human after all.

I think you played the first one very smoothly and was your best, the second slightly harder and percussive and the last one, much like the first.

If people are really interested in going to the nth degree and doing comparrisons, there needs to be a control. The control would have to be a mechanical devive to guarantee consistancy. But thats kinda silly in my eye. But then, I don't get the need to take things to this degree, its mostly about the fingers.

My tuppenceworth.

I do hope I haven't created outrage, though this is basschat.
[/quote]

No I see your point, and its valid. All three were played in the same position fingerstyle (I unfortunately grew up playing Iron Maiden so have to restrain myself from digging in too much). On reflection, the one in the middle has the action set a tad lower than the other two so good ears - I did think it sounded a little more percusive as a result of this.

The basic idea was putting three basses direct through flat EQ with someone playing the same basic progression using the same style/position of playing and see if anyone could spot which was which without any preconceptions or visual stimuli.

Posted

[quote name='Highfox' timestamp='1359643597' post='1958139']
I guess and that's all it is... Bitsa, Maya and USA P.
[/quote]

That's what I just came up with too. I didn't guess, of course. I used my experience and judgement to reach a well-reasoned conclusion incorporating all the evidence.

Oh alright, I guessed.

Posted

I got that the first was the 'nice' expensive Fender, but couldn't tell the others. Makes a good point though, they all sound >90% the same.

Posted

In order of personal preference: 2, 3, 1.

I actually think the US P sounds rather dull in comparison to the others, and the Bitsa in particular.

The third one isn't quite in tune with the other two, which affects the perception of tone, I would imagine.

Interesting though!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...