Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

The older I get, the harder it is to listen to new bands.....


The Admiral
 Share

Recommended Posts

.....because I'm finding that I just keep pricking up my ears at the stuff they have 'borrowed', in many cases I'm sure, unconsciously.

Case in point - I really liked the first Rival Sons album and suggested it to an american friend, who had a listen on iTunes and emailed me back along the lines of " do we really need another Led Zep tribute act". Now, I'd admit it's very deriviative and the first time I heard it I thought - 'hello, someones got a copy of Led Zep 1', but it's still a great a record and they are fantastic live - I saw them opening for Black Stone Cherry (another superb band - who are improving with every album), at Manchester Academy last year..

I've just bought the second RS album, and............... it's alarmingly like LZ II and III, even down to the acoustic stuff and general feel and a similar route of maturity in respect of it's relationship to the first album. I've listened about 5 times right through, and all I keep hearing is more little riffs and fills which are so derivative of LZ II & III that they are bordering on parody - and I'm beginning to find it annoying. That said, anyone who hasn't heard the source or isn't that familiar would not be phased by it, but I wondered if I'm alone in this kind of 'spotting'?

Clearly, everything new is a reflection of the influences of the writers, and we don't even want to go down the Beatles/Oasis cul de sac, but perhaps I'm just doomed. I know Andy Partridge from XTC doesn't listen to current music anymore, because he finds, after 30 years as a writer, he just distills everything down to it's ingredients : "50% Beatles, 30% Slade and 20% Abba" for example. (The full story is in Will Hodgkinson's book Song Man for those who are interested.) I'll never have 1% of the writing or general musical talent/chops as Mr Partridge, but I get where he's coming from.

Just me and Andy then, or is it a general thing which comes with middle age and there are others out there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see where you're coming from, but it's not something that bothers me too much. But if it did I'd see it as a challenge to find the 1 or 2% that is actually new: what little tiny twist are they bringing to the show? There's always something. Even with Oasis ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 years ago I wouldn't have agreed with you, but recently I'm finding almost all new music doesn't grab me. It's mostly all been done before, and the stuff that hasn't been done before wasn't done for a good reason.

Probably not a good state of mind for a musician, maybe it's normal after 30+ years of listening and studying songs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='The Admiral' timestamp='1360510592' post='1971434']
.....because I'm finding that I just keep pricking up my ears at the stuff they have 'borrowed', in many cases I'm sure, unconsciously.
[/quote]
So, don't read the great myths of the ancient world if you want to carry on liking Hollywood films.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pop music is a disposable commodity constructed to satisfy the whims of market forces, Rock music too, for the most part. I invest very little time in new bands / artists as inevitably they're trotting out the same old formulaeic tosh.

That's not to say that if somebody plays me a new band I'll 'nay say' it before hearing it; I'm willing to listen to anything really, but most of it is either trite old rehashes, or too dependent on Autotune for my liking.

Edited by paul_5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Stan_da_man' timestamp='1360516635' post='1971576']
Simple solution - don't listen to [b]rock[/b] music.
[size=4][/quote][/size]
[size=4]Great suggestion - I'll just stop breathing while I'm at it. :rolleyes:[/size]

[size=4]In a previous band we did two Zeppelin covers and two Rival Sons covers - and having listened to them [i]very[/i] closely indeed, to my ears they are most definitely different. But it's easy to see why anyone would think otherwise.[/size]

The band I'm most into right now are The Black Keys - they are young, but their blues rock influences are undeniable. However, to me they sound extremely fresh, original and exciting in spite of this and they are not reminiscent of any specific artist.

In any case, if you're [i]that [/i]jaded and bored with new music, why not write a few new classics yourself? I'd like to hear them. :D

Edited by discreet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose this will always be a contentious subject. Just wrote what I thought was a really 'sweet', cool song with a band mate. Just guitar and vocal with a little bass noodling in the background. We then played it to another band member. Before we'd got to the chorus, his hands were up 'let me stop you there boys, it's ''Going To California'', you can't do that.'
So here's the thing. It has different chords, different melody and the chorus is way different. It turns out it 'reminds' him of 'Going To California', it's not the same at all.
That's the thing for me. Just because a song 'reminds' you of something, surely doesn't make it derivative. Neither me nor the guitarist remotely had Led Zep in mind when we jammed it into a song; it just arrived!
The simple fact is we all arrived way too late (BTW, I'm 47 at the end of this month) to come up with something that hasn't been done before by someone, somewhere, at sometime even if you don't know it yet. Best thing to do: play on, play what you like, listen to what you like and if it reminds you of something good....... isn't that actually a good thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='paulconnolly' timestamp='1360518995' post='1971634']
It's called age mate :). The stuff we grew up with and that resonates with our lives is "always inferior to" what comes along now.
[/quote]

So true. We fondly remember the music we grew up with because it coincided with huge portentous growing-up events in our young lives when we were impressionable and open-minded.

We've just become opinionated, staid, boring, set in our ways and are not receptive to new ideas. Simples! :lol:

Edited by discreet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1360519743' post='1971655']...We've just become opinionated, staid, boring, set in our ways and are not receptive to new ideas. Simples! :lol:
[/quote]

...and crotchety. You forgot crotchety. :mellow:

As for the topic: once you've listened to Sandy Denny, it's difficult to be [i]more [/i]enthralled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think it has very little to do with the music, and a lot to do with the emotions and experiences of the listener.

I firmly believe that music you discover during your formative years touches us in a way that music we come to in later life can't. Bands you discovered when you were changing from a child into an adult---discovering love, the opposite sex, parties, having your own pay cheque in your pocket for the first time, etc etc etc, touch us in a way that others just can't. I think its the reason why older guys always grumble about all new music being rubbish, not the same as in their day, yadda yadda. And they're probably right---how can Blink 182 excite you as much as 70s punk when you first kissed your first girlfriend to a soundtrack of The Clash?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...