Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Value of a Warwick Fortress stage one 90's model


barklama
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Was wondering on what value i would put on my WARWICK FORTRESS STAGE ONE in oiled red colour, All the usuall stuff babunga body / wengeneck...Mec Pickups / active circuit...

The bass is 16 years old and plays mint, has nice action.. Has usuall wear and tear on the back of the body.. Apart from that the bass is faultless.. Much better than new warwick, i orignally bought it from the bass centre.....

Any idea on price/value, any ideas would be much appreciated...

Thanks Ant :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, £400-450 is probably the best you're likely to get at the moment; it was the original budget Warwick model, after all.

And it's almost certainly not a bubinga body - I think most were maple, with maybe some made of ash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='mart' timestamp='1369142351' post='2085340']
Yep, £400-450 is probably the best you're likely to get at the moment; it was the original budget Warwick model, after all.

And it's almost certainly not a bubinga body - I think most were maple, with maybe some made of ash.
[/quote]

I thought the Corvette standard was the budget model?

Is a £700 instrument really a budget model though?

I think the Fortress sold for £1K new in the 90's

Edited by megallica
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='megallica' timestamp='1369234970' post='2086703']
I thought the Corvette standard was the budget model?

Is a £700 instrument really a budget model though?

I think the Fortress sold for £1K new in the 90's
[/quote]
I'd love to see a Warwick pricelist from the 90's (although 1999 was probably quite different from 1991!) but I'd be surprised if the Fortress was as much as £1k even at the end of the decade. (I bought mine in '98 for about 1600 deutschmarks IIRC). In any case, when I say "budget" I mean relative to the whole Warwick range.

The Rockbass Fortresses have a list price higher than the Corvettes which suggests you might be right that the Corvette is more of a budget model than the Fortress, but something I read somewhere made me think otherwise. The only supporting evidence I can find at the moment is the slightly ambiguous quote in [url="http://forum.warwick.de/showthread.php/16300-The-History-of-Warwick-Bass"]http://forum.warwick.de/showthread.php/16300-The-History-of-Warwick-Bass[/url] about the introduction of the Fortress (one year after the Corvette): "The Fortress is positioned a bit 'lower than the Corvette, which then takes the role of entry level instrument."

I'll see if I can find some old magazines from the 90s with prices in - that would give the best comparison of the models' relative standing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='mart' timestamp='1369307240' post='2087499']
I'd love to see a Warwick pricelist from the 90's (although 1999 was probably quite different from 1991!) but I'd be surprised if the Fortress was as much as £1k even at the end of the decade. (I bought mine in '98 for about 1600 deutschmarks IIRC). In any case, when I say "budget" I mean relative to the whole Warwick range.

The Rockbass Fortresses have a list price higher than the Corvettes which suggests you might be right that the Corvette is more of a budget model than the Fortress, but something I read somewhere made me think otherwise. The only supporting evidence I can find at the moment is the slightly ambiguous quote in [url="http://forum.warwick.de/showthread.php/16300-The-History-of-Warwick-Bass"]http://forum.warwick...of-Warwick-Bass[/url] about the introduction of the Fortress (one year after the Corvette): "The Fortress is positioned a bit 'lower than the Corvette, which then takes the role of entry level instrument."

I'll see if I can find some old magazines from the 90s with prices in - that would give the best comparison of the models' relative standing.
[/quote]

I can imagine there could have been a definite overlap in the prices of these two ranges as there were a few different models released.
I've still got a few issues of Bassist magazine from 95-96, I seem to remember the Corvette was £700 new and the Fortress was 1K. There were a few options with the Fortress, maybe the passive ash models were cheaper than the active Corvette at the time. I'll see if I can find the ad I'm thinking of tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='megallica' timestamp='1369316963' post='2087689']
I can imagine there could have been a definite overlap in the prices of these two ranges as there were a few different models released.
I've still got a few issues of Bassist magazine from 95-96, I seem to remember the Corvette was £700 new and the Fortress was 1K. There were a few options with the Fortress, maybe the passive ash models were cheaper than the active Corvette at the time. I'll see if I can find the ad I'm thinking of tonight.
[/quote]
Ok, it looks like you were right, and I was right! I've just come across a review of the Streamer bolt-on in Guitarist, May 1993, and it quotes the prices of Warwick's various bolt-ons as: Fortress One (passive) £773, Corvette Proline £999, Streamer bo £1132, Thumb bo £1178. So the F1 was the "budget" model, but yes, it probably was around £1000 by the end of the decade.

But yes, I'd expect you are right that there was some overlap between the prices of the Fortress range and the Corvette range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was the advert I mentioned from the old Bassist magazine.

[url="http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww129/darkskies/scan0001-5_zpsb255b9d6.jpg"][URL=http://s712.photobucket.com/user/darkskies/media/scan0001-5_zpsb255b9d6.jpg.html][IMG]http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww129/darkskies/scan0001-5_zpsb255b9d6.jpg[/IMG][/URL][/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just recently sanded down my green fortress to reveal a lovely maple grain, two piece - love it! They're great basses for the money although I put a passive set up in my bass with wizards for a more traditional sound. I paid £350 for mine about a year ago, the previous owner I believe had it from new and paid over £1k back in the 90's. My Fortress has become my main gigging bass for my soul band especially now that I've ditched the bogie green colour, much prefer the oiled natural looks, superb slim necks too and top Warwick build quality. Mine is definitely a keeper ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Rasta' timestamp='1369375121' post='2088419']
I've just recently sanded down my green fortress to reveal a lovely maple grain, two piece - love it! They're great basses for the money although I put a passive set up in my bass with wizards for a more traditional sound. I paid £350 for mine about a year ago, the previous owner I believe had it from new and paid over £1k back in the 90's. My Fortress has become my main gigging bass for my soul band especially now that I've ditched the bogie green colour, much prefer the oiled natural looks, superb slim necks too and top Warwick build quality. Mine is definitely a keeper ;)
[/quote]

If it didn't have the super slim neck I think I would still have mine, the active preamp in mine gave it a really versatile sound.
One day I'd like to own the five string version just to have that sound with a wider neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Rasta' timestamp='1369375121' post='2088419']
I've just recently sanded down my green fortress to reveal a lovely maple grain, two piece - love it! They're great basses for the money although I put a passive set up in my bass with wizards for a more traditional sound. I paid £350 for mine about a year ago, the previous owner I believe had it from new and paid over £1k back in the 90's. My Fortress has become my main gigging bass for my soul band especially now that I've ditched the bogie green colour, much prefer the oiled natural looks, superb slim necks too and top Warwick build quality. Mine is definitely a keeper ;)
[/quote]

We (more specifically I :) ) need pics! Ahh, go on, go on, go on. :)

BTW, how,long did it take you to sand it down? The finish on mine looks bomb-proof!

Edit: sorry, bit of a thread derail there. I'd say 400-450 depending on condition, finish, etc. As you were.

Edited by Muzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Muzz' timestamp='1369380818' post='2088466']
We (more specifically I :) ) need pics! Ahh, go on, go on, go on. :)

BTW, how,long did it take you to sand it down? The finish on mine looks bomb-proof!

Edit: sorry, bit of a thread derail there. I'd say 400-450 depending on condition, finish, etc. As you were.
[/quote]

Haha keeping to the thread, i'd say £400-500 too, i think they're a lot of bass for the money and easily worth more IMO.

Going off thread, well it took about a week to sand, blood sweat and fears. It still isn't perfect but its livable. I so much prefer the bass now though. Despite going all passive with Wizards trads it still retains some of that woody growl of the Warwick tone. Its a weird one as i didn't really believe all that 'it's in the wood' milarky but i guess now i'm a believer :D

Anyhow, i've said it a billion times...great basses!!!...and now my main gigging bass...again :rolleyes:

Link here to build thread & pics [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/207017-advice-on-finishing-a-maple-warwick-body/"]http://basschat.co.uk/topic/207017-advice-on-finishing-a-maple-warwick-body/[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...