tedmanzie Posted June 17, 2013 Posted June 17, 2013 [quote name='Marvin' timestamp='1371116531' post='2109929'] Didn't like them either, for exactly the same reason...so the Stone Roses weren't even original at being unlikeable. [/quote] There are very few truths in music, but here are three: The Smiths were brilliant The Stone Roses first album was brilliant Lady In Red is terrible Quote
Judo Chop Posted June 17, 2013 Posted June 17, 2013 [quote name='iconic' timestamp='1371102982' post='2109745'] Fools gold.....a bass classic. [/quote] How come? Quote
The Dark Lord Posted June 17, 2013 Posted June 17, 2013 Is it just me, or (sound recording quality aside) is this not awful? [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gvj33gn144[/media] Quote
tedmanzie Posted June 18, 2013 Posted June 18, 2013 [quote name='The Dark Lord' timestamp='1371474081' post='2114230'] Is it just me, or (sound recording quality aside) is this not awful? [/quote] I went to see Blur in Hyde Park a few years ago. A crowd signing along can be great, but when they sing at full volume to every single word of every single song..... I ended up as far back as i could get just so I could hear the band over the out of tune terrace style din... This seems like the same thing, I'm not sure I could take it! Quote
tony_m Posted June 18, 2013 Posted June 18, 2013 Ah, that explains all the Stone Roses t-shirts we saw in That London that weekend! * [size=3]smacks forehead [/size]* We were down there for my other-half's daughter's alt-folk band EP launch party, which I suspect was a rather more intimate affair... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.