P-T-P Posted June 9, 2008 Posted June 9, 2008 A tune we're learning has a chord in it that I've seen written down as being Amaj9. The notes in the chord (as played on the guitar) are A - E - G# - B - E. What's confusing me, in terms of the name of the chord, is the lack of a C# in the actual notes that are played in the song. If someone had asked me to play an Amj9 arpeggio I would have included a C# in there. Wouldn't the missing C# make the B in the chord a suspended 2nd or does the fact that G# is present as the major 7th force the B, by default, to be a 9th? Just to avoid any further confusion, the chord is almost certainly an A in the context of the tune as it serves to set-up a key change between A and E. Quote
P-T-P Posted June 9, 2008 Author Posted June 9, 2008 [quote name='dlloyd' post='215300' date='Jun 9 2008, 11:19 AM']Is anybody else playing a C#?[/quote] Don't think so, vocal harmonies possibly. Though my question grew more from the fact that I have seen that particular guitar chord voicing referred to as an Amaj9 (irrespective of the song I'm learning it happens to have cropped up in). I wasn't particularly bothered by the chord name until I had to transpose to a different key and didn't like any of the voicings I'd come up with on my own so wanted to look for an alternative. I looked for the tab/chords for the song, where it's named as Amaj9 and if you do a search for Amaj9 chord shapes, that particular voicing commonly occurs (minus the C#). Quote
Bilbo Posted June 9, 2008 Posted June 9, 2008 dlloyd is right - or it could be a A maj 9 (no 3rd) - by leaving the third out, you can create an 'open' feel whose ambiguity creates a texture all of its own (its subtle but its there). Coltrane often played minor chords without thirds to create a similar effect. Quote
P-T-P Posted June 9, 2008 Author Posted June 9, 2008 [quote name='dlloyd' post='215334' date='Jun 9 2008, 11:58 AM']Is the voicing x02100? I would normally call that Amaj7 sus2 without any other context. If there is a C# anywhere in the harmonies it'll become an Amaj9.[/quote] Yup, that's the voicing and Ama7 sus2 is excatly what I wanted to call it, but seeing it referred to as Amaj9 had me doubting. Serves me right for believing the internet. I'm pretty sure there's no C# anywhere else as it sounded a bit odd with the C# played in the guitar chord and in the overall sequence of chords it makes sense (to me at least) that it be absent as it's disappearance and re-appearance lead nicely into the key change. [quote name='bilbo230763' post='215338' date='Jun 9 2008, 12:04 PM']dlloyd is right - or it could be a A maj 9 (no 3rd) - by leaving the third out, you can create an 'open' feel whose ambiguity creates a texture all of its own (its subtle but its there). Coltrane often played minor chords without thirds to create a similar effect.[/quote] That makes sense too, the ambiguity creates a certain drama and allows for the possibility of moving in a couple of directions. Thanks both. Quote
jakenewmanbass Posted June 9, 2008 Posted June 9, 2008 Agreed the no 3rd description is what I would go for. It has an almost suspended quality, used a lot by Kenny Wheeler and other modern composers for drama and freedom of movement. I would expect it to state "no 3rd" in the chord spelling, otherwise an Amaj9 [i]would[/i] include a 3rd. Quote
Alun Posted June 15, 2008 Posted June 15, 2008 You could also think of it as an E major triad with an A in the bass - E/A. Cheers Alun Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.