Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Band leader: I want a songlist of 200 songs...


solo4652
 Share

Recommended Posts

First meeting/jam/rehearsal of the new band yesterday. It's being set up by the guitarist who's fed up with his 9 - 5 job and wants a full-time pro wedding band. "I want 200 songs on the songlist", he said, "and no notes on stage". I'm now contemplating the huge task of learning 200 songs - gulp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

learning 200 songs is OK been in a few bands including my current one that has about this - difficulty is learning 200 songs so they're all tight and sound great - getting to that level takes months of constant practice for that amount of songs and keeping them there takes loads more constant effort as well. You're better off sticking to about 75 you can do really well and rotate, 30-40 each gig...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

200 songs? I don`t think I would have taken my bass out from the gig bag!

To learn that many songs and have them down so you don`t need any chords sheets on stage, you would need to be this guy..

[attachment=145339:250px-ObiWanHS-SWE.jpg]

Using the old Jedi mind trick of course....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provided you don't have to learn them all at once for the first rehearsal...

I think we've got a back catalogue of about 200 songs, over the 4 years we've played together. Some we've only done once (e.g. View to a kill, the Bond theme tune, 'wish I was James Bond' for a 'Bond' themed night), some we've played almost every gig (Disco Inferno and Le Freak).

Having said that, you're going to be able to play what, 35 ish per gig...? And about 50% of those are going to be your wedding standards. (Celebrate good times, etc ad nauseum) so maybe he's being a bit demanding.

Is he expecting to have the set list decided on the night by the punters asking for requests?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BobVbass' timestamp='1380895873' post='2232092']
learning 200 songs is OK been in a few bands including my current one that has about this - difficulty is learning 200 songs so they're all tight and sound great - getting to that level takes months of constant practice for that amount of songs and keeping them there takes loads more constant effort as well. You're better off sticking to about 75 you can do really well and rotate, 30-40 each gig...
[/quote]

Spot-on. Then if you get asked to do a longer gig you still have enough well rehearsed material. Any band that doesn`t rehearse their songs regularly will have issues when dragging unrehearsed ones out. The only exception I can see to that is if you`re all doing it full-time, and diligently rehearsing them at home individually but even then I wouldn`t expect them to be as good as if rehearsed with the band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, get enough learned initially to a good enough standard to get you through the gig then at least you can start working whilst expanding the set list. Doing 200 from scratch and *then* moving onto gigging is a non starter. It'll take so long to get them all up to standard that you will probably start losing band members and then you are chasing your tail bedding in replacements whilst still trying to get this theoretical 200 song list up and running, it'll be like painting the Forth bridge.
Band I'm in sometimes does wedding too though we don't really promote ourselves as a wedding band at all. They sent me 33 songs to learn and that's more than we'll ever play at a gig. We've then started learning new stuff whilst gigging with a set list culled from the original 33 so our total is now more like 40 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might suit him if he treats it as his day job but if this is him on day one of the decision to push this band, what happens
when things don't work out as planned... and he decrees something else.. and you other guys have day jobs..??

He will be taking any gig he can lay his hands on as he needs to crunch the money in as much as poss and you have agreed all this..?

As long as you are all aboard, but you'll need about 40 weddings a year at £300 per person per week..plus teaching and other gigs
to make a regular living..??

So...40 weddings is some going, as is getting £1500 for them..
Tough work... best of luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're better off trying to learn '200 motels'.

http://youtu.be/SfZrNLipVmk

I once depped for a band for a couple of months, and their 'pad' consisted of about 40 songs that I had to learn from 2 CDs. One rehearsal and we were off. I would imagine that 200 songs is a [i]bit[/i] of a tall order...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

200 as a future goal or starting out ?

I only speak for myself, and as a non reader, but you can learn and remember the lines and fills to most pop songs in minutes, but the structure for a song thats not already deeply routed already in your brain takes time to be so.

200 would be an epic fail on all levels

Would it not be better to start with 30, and if the band can get these down, and play with complete confidence, with no sheets, then you can slowly add and add ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='solo4652' timestamp='1380891999' post='2232006']
First meeting/jam/rehearsal of the new band yesterday. It's being set up by the guitarist who's fed up with his 9 - 5 job and wants a full-time pro wedding band. "I want 200 songs on the songlist", he said, "and no notes on stage". I'm now contemplating the huge task of learning 200 songs - gulp.
[/quote]

This Guitard of yours; is it Malmsteen, Blackmore?? Why are you still there? Think Pantera..walk!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a bit dumbstruck when guitar said 200 songs. I've managed 40 in the past, but that took months of effort and practice. Since this is a brand new band (and I'm the oldest, most experienced, most grumpy and most world-weary), I'm trying to go with the flow for now and let the others realise for themselves that there is an[i] awful[/i] lot of work ahead. I'm trying not to come across as negative or obstructive. It's hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='solo4652' timestamp='1380891999' post='2232006']
First meeting/jam/rehearsal of the new band yesterday. It's being set up by the guitarist who's fed up with his 9 - 5 job and wants a full-time pro wedding band. "I want 200 songs on the songlist", he said, "and no notes on stage". I'm now contemplating the huge task of learning 200 songs - gulp.
[/quote]

How many songs are based on Pachelbel's Canon? Just alternate those with 12-bars and you can get your 200 pretty quickly.

This is where being a ZZ Top or Motorhead tribute band plays off, there's only the one song to learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[size=4][font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]This is crazy.

The band will never keep 200 numbers and arrangements up to spec.

50 numbers maybe, but 200 is silly and unnecessary. This guy is demonstrating that he doesn't really have a handle on what is needed to run a good quality band.

It's a given that you need to pick the right numbers but the priority should be to start with quality rather than quantity.[/font][/size]

Edited by chris_b
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...