krysh Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 the shuker neck on my frankenjazz: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlloyd Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 (edited) Some disinformation in this thread. Musicman have trademarked their headstocks, just as Fender have, as well as the specific arrangement of string posts on the headstock: [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.1"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.1[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.2"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.2[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.3"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.3[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.4"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.4[/url] Instruments such as the Teisco, Gus and Ou7shine's don't infringe on these trademarks. The Yamaha apparently does (I imagine it's in the tuner arrangement) Edit: Note, there is no patent involved, nor is it copyright... it's a registered trademark. Edit2: The term "3+1" is also a trademark. I imagine the Shuker above also infringes the string post arrangement trademark. Edited November 20, 2013 by dlloyd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedX Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 [quote name='dlloyd' timestamp='1384946115' post='2282541'] Some disinformation in this thread. Musicman have trademarked their headstocks, just as Fender have, as well as the specific arrangement of string posts on the headstock: [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.1"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.1[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.2"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.2[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.3"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.3[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.4"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.4[/url] Instruments such as the Teisco, Gus and Ou7shine's don't infringe on these trademarks. The Yamaha apparently does (I imagine it's in the tuner arrangement) Edit: Note, there is no patent involved, nor is it copyright... it's a registered trademark. [/quote] Unfortunately none of your links work :-( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlloyd Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 (edited) [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1384946666' post='2282554'] Unfortunately none of your links work :-( [/quote] Yes... it looks like you have to go from the start. Go to [url="http://www.uspto.gov/"]http://www.uspto.gov/[/url] then click on "Trademarks" then "Trademark Search". Click on "Word and/or Design Mark Search (Structured)" then put in the search term box: "1495728" Bit long-winded, but it should bring up the four trademark registrations that are currently active. Edited November 20, 2013 by dlloyd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muttley Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 [quote name='dlloyd' timestamp='1384946115' post='2282541'] Some disinformation in this thread. Musicman have trademarked their headstocks, just as Fender have, as well as the specific arrangement of string posts on the headstock: [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.1"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.1[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.2"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.2[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.3"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.3[/url] [url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.4"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.4[/url] Instruments such as the Teisco, Gus and Ou7shine's don't infringe on these trademarks. The Yamaha apparently does (I imagine it's in the tuner arrangement) Edit: Note, there is no patent involved, nor is it copyright... it's a registered trademark. Edit2: The term "3+1" is also a trademark. I imagine the Shuker above also infringes the string post arrangement trademark. [/quote] Thanks for posting that . I was in the process of adding something similar myself. I will add a couple of things: The Americans have something called a "Design Patent". This is a bit like Registered Design in that it protects a shape etc. It's how Apple and Samsung wasted so much money on their lawyers . "Patents" (pronounced patt-ents, not pay-tents) protect inventions. To be granted a patent an idea has to be [u]both[/u] novel (no-one has thought of it before) [u]and[/u] inventive (non-obvious to those skilled in the art). Putting a tuner peg on the other side of a headstock cannot ever be termed inventive so a patent would never be granted. [size=2]IANAL but I used to work with IP a lot.[/size] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt P Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 my favorite is the 2+3 config, allows for a shortish headstock and a bit more space for the low B. as seen on my Letts 5 string, it works a treat. i found that the 3+2 config on my rockbass and my old Yamaha was always a bit touch and go when it came to fitting the low B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.