Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Examples of 3+1 tuner configs


ZenBasses
 Share

Recommended Posts

Some disinformation in this thread.

Musicman have trademarked their headstocks, just as Fender have, as well as the specific arrangement of string posts on the headstock:

[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.1"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.1[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.2"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.2[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.3"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.3[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.4"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.4[/url]

Instruments such as the Teisco, Gus and Ou7shine's don't infringe on these trademarks. The Yamaha apparently does (I imagine it's in the tuner arrangement)

Edit: Note, there is no patent involved, nor is it copyright... it's a registered trademark.

Edit2: The term "3+1" is also a trademark.

I imagine the Shuker above also infringes the string post arrangement trademark.

Edited by dlloyd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dlloyd' timestamp='1384946115' post='2282541']
Some disinformation in this thread.

Musicman have trademarked their headstocks, just as Fender have, as well as the specific arrangement of string posts on the headstock:

[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.1"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.1[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.2"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.2[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.3"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.3[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.4"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.4[/url]

Instruments such as the Teisco, Gus and Ou7shine's don't infringe on these trademarks. The Yamaha apparently does (I imagine it's in the tuner arrangement)

Edit: Note, there is no patent involved, nor is it copyright... it's a registered trademark.
[/quote]

Unfortunately none of your links work :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1384946666' post='2282554']
Unfortunately none of your links work :-(
[/quote]

Yes... it looks like you have to go from the start.

Go to [url="http://www.uspto.gov/"]http://www.uspto.gov/[/url] then click on "Trademarks" then "Trademark Search". Click on "Word and/or Design Mark Search (Structured)" then put in the search term box: "1495728"

Bit long-winded, but it should bring up the four trademark registrations that are currently active.

Edited by dlloyd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dlloyd' timestamp='1384946115' post='2282541']
Some disinformation in this thread.

Musicman have trademarked their headstocks, just as Fender have, as well as the specific arrangement of string posts on the headstock:

[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.1"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.1[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.2"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.2[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.3"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.3[/url]
[url="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:80336p.4.4"]http://tess2.uspto.g...4806:80336p.4.4[/url]

Instruments such as the Teisco, Gus and Ou7shine's don't infringe on these trademarks. The Yamaha apparently does (I imagine it's in the tuner arrangement)

Edit: Note, there is no patent involved, nor is it copyright... it's a registered trademark.

Edit2: The term "3+1" is also a trademark.

I imagine the Shuker above also infringes the string post arrangement trademark.
[/quote]

Thanks for posting that :). I was in the process of adding something similar myself.

I will add a couple of things:
The Americans have something called a "Design Patent". This is a bit like Registered Design in that it protects a shape etc. It's how Apple and Samsung wasted so much money on their lawyers ;).
"Patents" (pronounced patt-ents, not pay-tents) protect inventions. To be granted a patent an idea has to be [u]both[/u] novel (no-one has thought of it before) [u]and[/u] inventive (non-obvious to those skilled in the art). Putting a tuner peg on the other side of a headstock cannot ever be termed inventive so a patent would never be granted.

[size=2]IANAL but I used to work with IP a lot.[/size]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my favorite is the 2+3 config, allows for a shortish headstock and a bit more space for the low B. as seen on my Letts 5 string, it works a treat. i found that the 3+2 config on my rockbass and my old Yamaha was always a bit touch and go when it came to fitting the low B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...