Guest MoJo Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 I love the growl of my TB500H but am less than impressed with the ineffectual EQ in the preamp. I've got a Boss GEB-7 heading my way but I'm unsure whether it should go in front of the preamp or in the effects loop to get the best out of it Quote
pete.young Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 In front. Guessing that like most amps, the effects loop will be parallel so you will only be EQing half the signal. Plus the loop will be looking for a line level device not an instrument level device like your GEB-7. Quote
Billy Apple Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 I read that the effects loop is for rack stuff, and not pedals (of course cant find the link now), for whatever reason pedals cause distortion. I'd want to EQ the clean signal. If you EQ post, then you are kind of EQ'ing a muddied tone Quote
RandomBass Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 If I remember rightly the effects loop is serial - as are most amps I thought. However, the effects level is darned high on the TB500 - you will be better off putting it between the instrument and the input. Give it a try either way, and see which works best for you. Cheers Geoff Quote
Happy Jack Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 I'm proud of myself. I resisted the temptation to reply "on the floor". Oh no ... wait ... Quote
BigRedX Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 [quote name='pete.young' timestamp='1386769525' post='2304237'] In front. Guessing that like most amps, the effects loop will be parallel so you will only be EQing half the signal. [/quote] If that's the case, then it's piss-poor design. An effects loop should be either series or switchable. I can't think of a single instance when parallel only is more useful. Quote
andydye Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 [quote name='Happy Jack' timestamp='1386839573' post='2305092'] I'm proud of myself. I resisted the temptation to reply "on the floor". Oh no ... wait ... [/quote] Quote
Billy Apple Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 [quote name='Happy Jack' timestamp='1386839573' post='2305092'] I'm proud of myself. I resisted the temptation to reply "on the floor". Oh no ... wait ... [/quote] It'll be YOU who'll be on the floor in a minute, young man! *raises hand-bag off lap in an Oscar-Wildey-Stylee* Quote
pete.young Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 (edited) [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1386839921' post='2305098'] If that's the case, then it's piss-poor design. An effects loop should be either series or switchable. I can't think of a single instance when parallel only is more useful. [/quote] Markbass are parallel by default, switchable with a jumper inside the case. I assumed that most amps would be done this way, but it seems that I'm wrong, and that series are more common. Apologies. From the circuit diagram it looks like it is indeed a series loop. The point about the line level signal still stands. One reason given is that, even if something fails in the loop, you still get a noise coming out. Another reason is that it may allow to you blend the clean and effected signal, something which some older effects units may not offer. Edited December 12, 2013 by pete.young Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.