essexbasscat Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Believe it or not, I can't find the previous thread on this. Is there a difference in sound ? Ok, two cabs are often lighter to carry but ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discreet Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 [quote name='essexbasscat' timestamp='1389738057' post='2337469'] Ok, two cabs are often lighter to carry but ... [/quote] You can also use one 12 for rehearsal and two for gigs... for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 [quote name='essexbasscat' timestamp='1389738057' post='2337469'] Is there a difference in sound ? [/quote]Not if the configuration is identical save for the panels separating the two drivers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_b Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Some cabs may be voiced differently but I guess most would be pretty similar in a band situation. I prefer 2 x 112 cabs for the lighter carry (my back isn't good), the flexibility (I want to use 1 cab on occasion) and it's easier to fit them into the boot of the car. Having said that I'm using a Bergantino CN212 at the moment, which I find pretty heavy but sounds too good to leave at home. I'd be onto 2 CN112 cabs in a flash if they came up for sale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt on your Bass? Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I went for a 212 in the end for portability - only one cab to shift and same stage footprint. It also means I don't have to make a decision gig time about what rig to take (which I like) and it fits in the boot of my car perfectly when I drive to gigs. Sound wise, bill knows best Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xroads Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 2x112 vs. 212 of the same type give you some differences: - typically in the 2x112 setup you have 2 tweeters - the 2x112 configuration in most cases has a larger total cab volume, which some have said improves the low freq response Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bassman7755 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 [quote name='Bill Fitzmaurice' timestamp='1389738602' post='2337490'] Not if the configuration is identical save for the panels separating the two drivers. [/quote] Isn't a single larger cab inherently more efficient at lower frequencies ?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_the_bass Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Berg 2x12 vs 2x 1x12: I was able to A/B mine at the weekend with full range music from my ipod so I feel I can probably give you my experience with reasonable confidence. My 212 had tweeter set flat My 112s had one tweeter flat (top cab) and one tweeter off (bottom cab) So both speaker configs are the same with 2x 12" cones and 1 tweeter. Both are 4ohm configs and both were being run from identical power amps. The difference in volume was imperceptible if any. The 212 appeared to have less low end and high end than the 2x112, but I think it produced a more balanced full range tone where as the 2x112 gives a slightly mid scooped sound (hence seeming to deliver more high and low end). It really is down to personal preference as it comes down to what you like. I find the 2x112s are easier to transport. One cab in each hand means I can put one down to open doors. Either way I can carry bass, head and cab(s) in one trip unless I take all of the rig! After having a good listen this weekend I can definitely confirm than my prefered tone is bass - shuttlemax 12.2 - (power amp A) HD212 (power amp 2x HD112 Hope this helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sk8 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 i have two 112's for ease of manoeuvring plus as stated above i can use one cab or two if needed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 [quote name='bassman7755' timestamp='1389788586' post='2337854'] Isn't a single larger cab inherently more efficient at lower frequencies ?. [/quote]No. Low frequency sensitivity is proportional to the cabinet volume per driver, not the cabinet volume. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted January 16, 2014 Share Posted January 16, 2014 [quote name='chris_b' timestamp='1389746229' post='2337591'] I'd be onto 2 CN112 cabs in a flash if they came up for sale. [/quote] You need an amp that thrived on 2 ohms if you ran em both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_b Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 The CN112 cabs are 8 ohms each. I sometimes run my 3 AE112 cabs (2.7 ohm) with my Thunderfunk TFB750. It's comfortable running down to 2 ohms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.