Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

The best bass in the world - allegedly


Recommended Posts

It looks as if the seller of this bass owns a [url=http://www.theonion.com/articles/amazing-new-hyperbolic-chamber-greatest-invention,1321/]hyperbolic chamber[/url].

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/COLUMBUS-BASS-GUITAR-IN-VINTAGE-SUNBURST-/390826286537?pt=UK_Musical_Instruments_Guitars_CV&hash=item5aff0fddc9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"[b]ITS SOMETHING A BIT DIFFERENT AND WILL ENABLE ITS NEW OWNER TO REALLY STAND OUT FROM THE CROWD!"[/b]

[font="Helvetica neue, Helvetica, Verdana, sans-serif"][size="2"][color="#333333"]Yeah. I've never saw a sunburst jazz bass before...[/color][/size][/font]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the early 80's I was in a soul, blues & funk band and the bass player had a fender Jazz bass and a Columbus jazz bass which he used to play for different songs. However whenever we were in the studio, the engineer always preferred the sound of the columbus bass to the Fender.

Cheap does not always mean nasty.

Jazzyvee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bassassin' timestamp='1398456795' post='2434438']
On Planet 1977, when £86 was a lot of money. A [i][b]lot[/b][/i].

Jon.
[/quote]

Yup, in 1980 I spent £100 on a second hand bass. An immaculate, 1973, Sonic Blue Fender Telecaster.
I sold it 15 years later for £400.
Wish I'd kept it :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Meddle' timestamp='1398465926' post='2434538']
I never understand those Lawsuit basses that copy the bass and neck perfectly from the original designs but substitute the original headstock design with a gimpy alternative with terrible tuners. Why do that? Throw your heart and soul into 90% of the instrument, cheap out on the bit that holds it all in tune.
[/quote]

Well, to be pedantic, they're not "lawsuit" basses - there never was a lawsuit - probably because John Hall wasn't in the instrument business back then. However, there was a threat of legal action, made by Gibson's then parent company Norlin, against the US distributors of Ibanez, Elger, taking issue over the "open book" headstock proifile used on Ibanez Gibson copies up until 1976. No legal action was taken because the threat came a year after Ibanez headstock shapes had been changed to a non-infringing design.

However, the upshot of that was that other US & UK importers & distributors followed suit with their subsequent orders, so as not to be on the receiving end of actual litigation. Hence the gimpy headstock shapes.

Regarding the tuners - properly tightened & lubricated, the closed-back Gotohs with the cast buttons (as seen on this Columbus) are actually not bad - they also turn up on British basses of the same era, like Shergold Marathons. Usually on the MIJ copies they are on the more budget-oriented examples, such as Columbus, but higher-end copies from most major Japanese factories used good-quality open-back tuners.

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...