Sean Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 A [url="http://usa.yamaha.com/products/musical-instruments/guitars-basses/el-basses/signature_models/bb2024ma/?mode=model#tab=product_lineup"]Michael Anthony signature[/url] version of the World's best bass. Quote
ikay Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 This looks like a good example of a signature bass that doesn't offer any improvements over the standard version then! The only 'special' features I can see are different fretboard inlays and a new body colour. Don't really get this sort of signature malarky myself but I guess there are others who do. Quote
Horizontalste Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 While I agree with the world's best basses, I just can't get signature models. Give me one in natural and I'd be happy. Quote
Dingus Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 I prefer the regular version . The only real advantage to this MA model is the D -tuner and the two extra neck bolts. I'm not keen on the colour or the inlay either. A good opportunity wasted in my opinion. Quote
BluRay Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 I quite like the matched headstock and the hipshot addition is nice. Not so keen on the extra cutaway and ponsey inlay. Not sure I'd prefer it to the standard version really. Quote
Sean Posted July 4, 2014 Author Posted July 4, 2014 I have the Hipshot on mine anyway and that cutaway doesn't really add anything, its not like the top frets are hard to reach anyway. That inlay is bonkers. Quote
Ghost_Bass Posted July 8, 2014 Posted July 8, 2014 (edited) My 1025X doesn't need the hipshot and i don't see a poin for the new cuttaway if they aren't going to increase the number of frets. They're easy to access as they were. Matching headstock is a good idea but i also like the look of the wooden stripes. A don't see any advantage in this bass comparing to mine (except for the ressonat treatment also found on the normal 202x...). I think that a neckthrough, 24 frets or a separate tone for each pickup or even a blend control would be a much nicer (and offer better results) upgrade to this bass. Edited July 8, 2014 by Ghost_Bass Quote
Sean Posted July 12, 2014 Author Posted July 12, 2014 [quote name='Ghost_Bass' timestamp='1404834774' post='2496222'] My 1025X doesn't need the hipshot and i don't see a poin for the new cuttaway if they aren't going to increase the number of frets. They're easy to access as they were. Matching headstock is a good idea but i also like the look of the wooden stripes. A don't see any advantage in this bass comparing to mine (except for the ressonat treatment also found on the normal 202x...). I think that a neckthrough, 24 frets or a separate tone for each pickup or even a blend control would be a much nicer (and offer better results) upgrade to this bass. [/quote] I need the Hipshot. Best upgrade for this bass is a John East P-Retro. On the to-do list :-D Quote
LeftyJ Posted July 12, 2014 Posted July 12, 2014 Looks nice. Is it just me, or does that body look slightly slimmed-down? I don't like it as much as his earlier signature BB's though, the BB1000MA and the BB3000MA. Those have the classic BB shape, but with a slightly shorter top horn, and especially the 3000 with its neck-through-body construction is a highly desirable instrument Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.