mep Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Yesterday a thread was started called O[i]ooh I Say Mrs Peter Crouch[/i] and featured a picture of Abbey Clancy and what looks like a P Bass. The picture was from the Huffington Post [url="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/10/16/abbey-clanc-topless-vauxhall_n_5994450.html"]http://www.huffingto..._n_5994450.html[/url] I posted at lunchtime and when i got home to review my content the thread had gone. OK. So it's anther teasing photo of Abbey Clancy, and one of many. The photos are easily seen on the web site and I am not restricted from seeing them with my IP filter on. Why was the thread deleted? Were some of the posts getting too risque? Some people like to get a bit carried away at times. I can't imagine it was just down to the photograph. When I click on my history I get the error message [i][#10340] You do not have permission to view this topic.[/i] Hopefully a Mod will come along to explain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAY AGAINST THE MACHINE Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Yeah, what happened ;( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad3353 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 The OP was judged a bit 'limit', then some of the comments went too far beyond schoolboy humour, and a collegial decision was taken to remove it as unsuitable for 'General Discussion'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wateroftyne Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 And for the record, PMing a mod is the preferred method for raising these queries. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the boy Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 [quote name='wateroftyne' timestamp='1413551523' post='2579450'] And for the record, PMing a mod is the preferred method for raising these queries. :-) [/quote] Huh??? Sorry teacher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xilddx Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 No criticism of the mods from me on this, but I'm interested in the philosophical implications of why it's ok for kids to see sexualised images of women baring their breasts in The Sun, but not on Basschat. It is obviously legal to publish such images as there is no age restriction of The Sun, there were no naked breasts in this thread or on Huff Post. So is it simply context? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wateroftyne Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 [quote name='the boy' timestamp='1413554046' post='2579491'] Huh??? Sorry teacher. [/quote] No problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wateroftyne Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 [quote name='xilddx' timestamp='1413554431' post='2579498'] No criticism of the mods from me on this, but I'm interested in the philosophical implications of why it's ok for kids to see sexualised images of women baring their breasts in The Sun, but not on Basschat. It is obviously legal to publish such images as there is no age restriction of The Sun, there were no naked breasts in this thread or on Huff Post. So is it simply context? [/quote] It was one or two specific posts in the thread that pushed it over the edge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary mac Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Nige, it wasn't so much the pic in the OP, more the nature of some of the comments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary mac Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Sorry WOT and I posting at the same time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickeyboro Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Bah! I have no objection to pics of Mr Crouch bring posted to balance the argument. I don't promise to look at them... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the boy Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 [quote name='wateroftyne' timestamp='1413554610' post='2579503'] No problem. [/quote] 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xilddx Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 (edited) [quote name='wateroftyne' timestamp='1413554675' post='2579504'] It was one or two specific posts in the thread that pushed it over the edge. [/quote] Typical, but expected. Some peeps can be rather puerile when confronted with a picture of a woman whose legs are not firmly clamped together. Thanks WoT and thanks G Edited October 17, 2014 by xilddx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yorks5stringer Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 It could have been worse, imagine Peter Crouch straddling a P Bass.....?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad3353 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 [quote name='yorks5stringer' timestamp='1413559072' post='2579594'] It could have been worse... [/quote] Fixed. [size=4] [/size] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throwoff Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 [quote name='xilddx' timestamp='1413554431' post='2579498'] No criticism of the mods from me on this, but I'm interested in the philosophical implications of why it's ok for kids to see sexualised images of women baring their breasts in The Sun, but not on Basschat. It is obviously legal to publish such images as there is no age restriction of The Sun, there were no naked breasts in this thread or on Huff Post. So is it simply context? [/quote] The sun are in the process of phasing out page 3, they are not shouting about it but it is filtering out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xilddx Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 [quote name='throwoff' timestamp='1413560407' post='2579613'] The sun are in the process of phasing out page 3, they are not shouting about it but it is filtering out. [/quote] Yeah apparently so. The breasts will get smaller and the cod philosophy will get larger until Page Three becomes a Piers Morgan column. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisnameistaken Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Seems an entirely laudable editorial decision to me. Good call, mods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miles'tone Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 [quote name='xilddx' timestamp='1413560752' post='2579624'] Yeah apparently so. The breasts will get smaller and the cod philosophy will get larger until Page Three becomes a Piers Morgan column. [/quote] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mep Posted October 17, 2014 Author Share Posted October 17, 2014 Ok. No surprise really. Thought it was due to some posts. At least not mine. Thanks for the clarification. Next time I'll PM to ask such questions. I hoped Peter crouch played bass and it was his and he secretly visited BC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UglyDog Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 [quote name='the boy' timestamp='1413555457' post='2579524'] 😉 [/quote] I've seen this symbol a number of times and never managed to work out what it is. Can someone explain it to me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Rock Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 [quote name='UglyDog' timestamp='1413647319' post='2580535'] I've seen this symbol a number of times and never managed to work out what it is. Can someone explain it to me? [/quote] It's a wink, as in "only joking" or "I'm also in on that joke" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leschirons Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 [quote name='wateroftyne' timestamp='1413554675' post='2579504'] It was one or two specific posts in the thread that pushed it over the edge. [/quote] Hopefully not mine but I must admit to being a founder member of the "Easily led club" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waynepunkdude Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 IMO these thread do come across as a bunch of pervy old men going 'thwar' which I don't think is on on what should be a family forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wateroftyne Posted October 18, 2014 Share Posted October 18, 2014 [quote name='waynepunkdude' timestamp='1413648769' post='2580562'] ...on what should be a family forum. [/quote] Remind us why you've been placed on post approval in the past..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.