JJW Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/710-53481-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&pub=5575090229&toolid=10001&campid=5337531593&customid=&icep_item=141429990049&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229508&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg Quote
discreet Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Me neither, but I bet it doesn't suffer from neck dive. Quote
Bassassin Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 I think that's quite amazing, having (as I do) some major GAS for an acrylic headless. Jon. Quote
Annoying Twit Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 The seller is prepared to accept a personal cheque. Isn't that dangerous, as fraudulent cheques can still bounce quite a while after the funds have 'cleared' into someone's account? It was clearly designed to be a very unique bass. Quote
BigRedX Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 If you've never seen a bass like that before, then you need to spend some time reading [url=http://basschat.co.uk/topic/5525-weird-wonderful-basses/]this thread[/url]. Back to the item in the OP, it's somewhat overpriced IMO despite having the original Q-Tuner pickups. Moses basses also have a poor reputation when it comes to the structural quality of their carbon fibre necks. Quote
Happy Jack Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 What's all the extra gubbins included in the photos? Looks like a collapsible stock for an arquebus ... Quote
BigRedX Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 [quote name='Mattpt85' timestamp='1423043128' post='2679814'] someone please destroy it [/quote] Why? Other than a possible less than optimally constructed graphite neck, that's a fairly interesting instrument, Quote
Paul S Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 [quote name='Annoying Twit' timestamp='1423035140' post='2679722'] It was [b]clearly[/b] designed to be a very unique bass. [/quote] Nice If it were one decimal place cheaper and local I'd buy it. Quote
Mattpt85 Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1423044549' post='2679840'] Why? Other than a possible less than optimally constructed graphite neck, that's a fairly interesting instrument, [/quote] Each to their own and all that but in my eyes that is an abomination Quote
Bassassin Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1423044549' post='2679840'] Why? [/quote] I'm guessing because it deviates too dramatically from the approved design regulations, established in 1951. J. Quote
waynepunkdude Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 I'm not sure if I like it but it looks like it's priced about right. Quote
.jpg.518c69c2d9e1581799f3c11301dc2da5.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.