JJW Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/710-53481-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&pub=5575090229&toolid=10001&campid=5337531593&customid=&icep_item=141429990049&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229508&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discreet Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Me neither, but I bet it doesn't suffer from neck dive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassassin Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I think that's quite amazing, having (as I do) some major GAS for an acrylic headless. Jon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annoying Twit Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 The seller is prepared to accept a personal cheque. Isn't that dangerous, as fraudulent cheques can still bounce quite a while after the funds have 'cleared' into someone's account? It was clearly designed to be a very unique bass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedX Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 If you've never seen a bass like that before, then you need to spend some time reading [url=http://basschat.co.uk/topic/5525-weird-wonderful-basses/]this thread[/url]. Back to the item in the OP, it's somewhat overpriced IMO despite having the original Q-Tuner pickups. Moses basses also have a poor reputation when it comes to the structural quality of their carbon fibre necks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Jack Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 What's all the extra gubbins included in the photos? Looks like a collapsible stock for an arquebus ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattpt85 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 someone please destroy it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedX Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 [quote name='Mattpt85' timestamp='1423043128' post='2679814'] someone please destroy it [/quote] Why? Other than a possible less than optimally constructed graphite neck, that's a fairly interesting instrument, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul S Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 [quote name='Annoying Twit' timestamp='1423035140' post='2679722'] It was [b]clearly[/b] designed to be a very unique bass. [/quote] Nice If it were one decimal place cheaper and local I'd buy it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattpt85 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1423044549' post='2679840'] Why? Other than a possible less than optimally constructed graphite neck, that's a fairly interesting instrument, [/quote] Each to their own and all that but in my eyes that is an abomination Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassassin Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1423044549' post='2679840'] Why? [/quote] I'm guessing because it deviates too dramatically from the approved design regulations, established in 1951. J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waynepunkdude Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 I'm not sure if I like it but it looks like it's priced about right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.7e18f76540598a8efc0e6ca9be453059.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.