Higgie Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 Agreed. Tied note or not, without another accidental indicating otherwise, the red circles would be all F Naturals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustandbarley Posted April 22, 2015 Author Share Posted April 22, 2015 Thanks again people, I didn't anticipate this would be so confusing - I'll carry on as before. If anything the exercise demonstrates the importance of clear notation. Cheers for your help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chardbass Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 I'd want (and put, if I was arranging) a # on either the first tied quaver or the first red circle. They may be a "correct" way of writing things but when you're writing for musicians who will be either sight reading in a quick band call or even on the gig, you need to remove all question of doubt immediately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romberg Bevel Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 [quote name='dustandbarley' timestamp='1429687301' post='2753850'] Thanks again people, I didn't anticipate this would be so confusing... [/quote] It's confusing because they've adopted a rule outside of usual practice. [quote name='chardbass' timestamp='1429692446' post='2753906'] I'd want (and put, if I was arranging) a # on either the first tied quaver or the first red circle. They may be a "correct" way of writing things but when you're writing for musicians who will be either sight reading in a quick band call or even on the gig, you need to remove all question of doubt immediately. [/quote] I think the 'correct' way is as you describe! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB26354 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 I'm with Higgie on this. Technically the tied note in the 2nd bar is F and would need a sharp sign. Otherwise how would the reader know whether it was tied F sharp or a slur from F sharp to F natural? If we assume for a moment hat it is a tie and should be read as such the first note circled in red is F natural and should have a sharp sign. In my reading days it was good practice to put "courtesy" accidental a in to remove any ambiguity, as other have said. I normally saw these in parentheses as this was a reminder. The yellow-circled note appears to be cancelling a sharp that, in that bar, doesn't exist. I suspect the passage requires F sharp from the first bar on that line tied over and then through the second bar, ending with the yellow circled f natural in bar 3. That's not how it reads to me, though! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.