Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think we've visited this topic previously, but in his defence, I think you could probably count his signature models on one hand; aside from the new Warwick, there's been the green Fender Jazz, the <shudder> Warwick Reverso </shudder>, a gold/sparkly Precision. There may have been others.

Posted

[quote name='E sharp' timestamp='1433021339' post='2787216']
Well Mark King has had more signature basses , I reckon .
[/quote]

It seems to do well for Rob Green. Only 9 Kingbass varieties so far. See you next year for the new version with some pointlessly ludicrous miniscule twist.

In Adam Clayton's case, why is he doing it?! He doesn't need money and it's certainly not for prestige or something like that. He's one of the most famous bass players in the world. He could buy any bass ever made. Any amp ever made. It's just bonkers to put your name to something that you could buy so easily and disavow when the next NAMM show is on to pose with the next "shiny, "shiny."

I suppose I'm old school in this regard in that I find it wholly distasteful. I couldn't put my name to something and then turn around and sign up for something else in such a calculated, cynical fashion if I've given someone my word. Even more so if I was already rich beyond measure.

Posted (edited)

Victorwooten has had a few also, as has flea
I suspect part of it is ego, it must be quite flattering

I do think it's a touch overpriced though !

Edited by Geek99
Posted (edited)

It's quite attractive, up to the headstocj which just looks out of place :-s

Edited by Graham
Posted

Personally I don't need any signature basses. Surely it's solely a marketing ploy. Aren't all signature models?

The new wooden warwick tuners are possibly the least attractive 'improvement' or design feature I've seen. Not for me thanks

Posted

The idea of a single P in a Streamer body actually appeals to me but I'd not spend $6000 on ANY bolt-on neck Warwick (actually I'd not spend that on any bass). I can't see the justification for that price tag over any regular CV bass; CS or not it will surely be made with the same components from the same machinery in the same factories.

Posted

[quote name='Dazed' timestamp='1433071214' post='2787469']
Personally I don't need any signature basses. Surely it's solely a marketing ploy. Aren't all signature models?

The new wooden warwick tuners are possibly the least attractive 'improvement' or design feature I've seen. Not for me thanks
[/quote]

I think they could be done right - on a Warwick star bass ebony tuning pegs might be nice. But for a streamer it seems a little off to me.
Good idea as a custom shop option. Not as standard on anything IMO.

Posted

I like it - not $6000 worth of like to the point where I`d buy it, but it looks nice, and sounds nice as well. Not keen on the idea of wooden tuners though, must admit I had to re-run the clip to make sure I`d heard him say that and hadn`t imagined it.

Posted (edited)

I think the reason that Adam Clayton's many and varied signature basses are so widely ridiculed is that none of them are what could actually be described as his signature model i.e. synonymous with the player in the way that say a black P with mirrored pickguard would be associated with Phil Lynott. His basses are signature models only in the sense that his signature is printed on them. It seems to be a case of whenever he happens to get a new bass then the manufacturer - whoever that may be - puts his name on the headstock to shift a few extra units at a premium regardless of whether he will ever actually be seen playing live or in the studio with it.

Right, I'm of to scribble my name onto my Fender Jazz that I bought a few months ago despite having played Warwicks exclusively for the previous 10 years :)

Edited by Painy
Posted

[quote name='deepbass5' timestamp='1433080800' post='2787607']
Can someone explain to me how a passive treble and a passive bass control works ? :blink:
[/quote]

Cut only maybe?

Posted

[quote name='deepbass5' timestamp='1433080800' post='2787607']
Can someone explain to me how a passive treble and a passive bass control works ? :blink:
[/quote][quote name='Painy' timestamp='1433081543' post='2787617']
Cut only maybe?
[/quote]Makes sense, just a different value of capacitor; one for treble (as normal), one for bass (as found on some volume pots on guitars).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...