Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

If only he'd used a real Rickenbacker ...


Happy Jack
 Share

Recommended Posts

Surprised if he gets a couple of million out of them, were they that big? a couple of number 1 albums and a dozen or so top 20 singles? Actually I just checked and about 8 of original studio albums went Gold but no higher. So they made some money but I think old Pete's still being a bit optimistic.

Edited by KevB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently he gets a full share of royalties for material created in the periods he was in the band (12.5%)but only 1.25% for stuff created after he left. This would seem a good deal to me to be fair and it could be said he's taking the proverbial, asking for a share of material he has nothing to do with.
This information is from the other 3 ppl tho so maybe best took with a pinch of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='KevB' timestamp='1448988610' post='2919849']
Surprised if he gets a couple of million out of them, were they that big? a couple of number 1 albums and a dozen or so top 20 singles? Actually I just checked and about 8 of original studio albums went Gold but no higher. So they made some money but I think old Pete's still being a bit optimistic.
[/quote]

£7.8 million in the last four years, apparently!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing. Top marks to their marketing people. Never made it all the way through a 'best of' myself. ;) Had a quick look at the details for their last studio album, lots of collaborations which will no doubt bring in interest from fans of those other artists involved. I agree that it's a bit cheeky claiming royalties from work done after he's left and has had no input into, if that is indeed the case.

Edited by KevB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, not really about royalties more about company rights & control.

If this were just basic music royalties I'd say he didn't have a chance (assuming the others are telling the truth) but really this is asking; can a company transfer all rights to a different one without full board approval? I don't know but it seems a bit silly of them to me, they should have left the old rights in the old company & just put the new stuff through the new co. I kind of understand why they did it (either for ease of admin or they did actually want to put the boot in) but it seems they've created more work for themselves.

Be interesting to see the outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...