Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok, so they have reissued 'Old Smoothie', a prototype Stingray. Maybe this isn't such a shock.

This might be:

[url="http://blog.music-man.com/instruments/cutlass-and-caprice-basses/"]http://blog.music-man.com/instruments/cutlass-and-caprice-basses/[/url]

Cutlass and Caprice passive basses...!

Posted

Am I the only person to think that posting close-ups of just part of the basses is deeply [i][b]meh[/b][/i]?

Far from leaving me desperate to see more, it makes me keen to avoid being played for a fool, and in so transparent a manner.

Posted

So they went for a PJ and a P in a J and P type bodys... where have i seen that? :ph34r:

From the close ups i was hoping that they would look more like the Sabre basses, in body shape.

Posted

[quote name='Machines' timestamp='1453386138' post='2959013']
A total break from the history of Musicman, straight into the history of Fender.
[/quote]

Actually, the sense of this has just hit me. Musicman history IS (Leo) Fender history. So it's all OK.

In fact, all of the big brands are copying each other now. Fender copying G&L L-2000 with the Dimension, and now Musicman copying Fender with these P/J types. How long until Fender ends up copying itself ?!

Posted

Sadly I think EBMM may have come to the conclusion that although the Ray will always be a popular bass, the market is currently swaying towards indie bands playing passive P and J basses. The huge popularity of the P bass (yes, it has always been a popular bass, and probably the one we all associate with electric bass, but recently the whole superjazz popularity has dropped for a simple P bass) is probably something they wanted to experiment with.

If the tone Is anything like the Big Al in passive mode, they could be excellent.

Posted

I normally associate a certain wow factor with Music Man basses.

Even when it's 'wow, what the hell is that'.

First impressions, these just seem a bit generic.

Posted

Does the old smoothie have truss rod access at both ends? Or is that just a dark plug at the headstock end?

I can't imagine that moving the string tree across to the g string would have enough effect to justify it unless you needed access to the rod?

Had heard about the 10 pole pickup in an early prototype before and wondered if it would ever make an appearance... I wonder if it's a stock 5 string pickup?

Posted

[quote name='Musicman20' timestamp='1453392066' post='2959096']
The 10 pole piece pickup has been engineered from the original - same with the preamp. They should sound quite different.
[/quote]
Also has an alder body according to the spec list.

Posted

As for the Caprice and Cutlass basses, it will be very interesting to hear how these sound and feel to play. I like the look of the split P type pick up with large exposed poles - reminiscent of one of the earliest Stingray prototypes.

If they are as good as the Big Al then that will be excellent. I'm not sure about people saying meh on the basis of one or two pictures - oh I almost forgot - it's a bass forum where such things are de rigeur.....

Posted

Apparently the 10 pole piece pickup was originally two pickups that were joined somehow and changed.

I've just read that the bass still punches like a Stingray, but is mellower,smoother and fatter sounding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...