Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wazz, I can think of several reasons why they MIGHT have done it but dont know why they ACTUALLY did it.....

I guess the only way to find that out for sure might be to email them, unless there is a Fender-head on here that can come up with the goods?

Posted

[quote name='The Burpster' post='30298' date='Jul 11 2007, 03:05 PM']Wazz, I can think of several reasons why they MIGHT have done it but dont know whay they ACTUALLY did it.....

I guess the only way to find that out for sure might be to email them, unless there is a Fnederhead on here that can come up with the goods?[/quote]


I have a '96 Deluxe Jazz with the '5 in a row' Gotoh machines,

and I reckon it looks much better than the '4 + 1' arrangement...

Maybe Fender wanted a Musicman vibe to the headstock?

Posted

David,
I have a 2006 Deluxe Jazz V with the 4+1 and prefer that look. However, I like the 5 in a row also, that being the arrangement on the first Jazz V I tried.
Maybe its to do with balance, maybe its to do with keeping the look as original as possible with the elephant ear pegs.

Wazz

Posted

I think you've got it right! the 4 + 1 looks like a classic 4 string.

The MIM 5 string Jazz now has the 5 in a row design headstock.

I guess Fender just wanted them to look different...

Posted

it could be because having a tuner nearer the nut reduces headstock size and neck dive, allowing them to use elephant-ear tuners like on most jazz basses, there are still a lot of jazz basses with the 5 in a row with the gotoh mini tuners tho.

Posted

My '96 Jazz V DLX has five in a row, were Gotohs but I've changed them for schaller ultralites to reduce the shoulder strain on long gigs.

On my self-built P V Hamm mutant thing, I have Wilkinson elephant ears in a four over one arrangement.

Despite the added weight of the elephant ears, the P actually balances better on a strap, no uplift from the left hand required. I put this down to the moment of the 'G' tuner being nearer to the fulcrum (failed engineer speak).

Posted (edited)

[quote name='Muppet' post='30512' date='Jul 12 2007, 12:12 AM']On the normal Jazz V I think it was post 2004 and the Deluxe switched around 2003 I think...[/quote]

If I were to make a guess, I'd say it has something to do with the string tension being to much (or too little?) when there is that much "trailing" string between the nut and the machine head. I remember reading somewhere that this may have been an issue even on 4 strings, which is why LF came up with the 3+1 arrangement for the stingray. Don't know how accurate that story is; it may have been conjecture on the part of the author.

Edited by Sharkfinger

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...