Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Is there a reason for the apparent dislike for active basses...


Rocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

[quote name='EBS_freak' timestamp='1484604317' post='3216829']
Thats great if you can actually get to your amp... or don't want to manipulate the EQ mid song without going over to your amp.
[/quote]

I can always get to me amp no matter what the stage size. Plus mid-song I'm going to be to busy actually playing to be spending any time fiddling with the controls whether they are on my bass or at the amp.

[quote name='EBS_freak' timestamp='1484604252' post='3216827']
You do realise that if you run them passive, the pickups are going straight to the jack or running with horribly wrong pot values?
[/quote]

Most basses that have an active/passive switch actually have passive volume and pickup blend controls, only the EQ is active and that becomes disabled in passive mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only played active basses for many years - not because I felt they had to be active but because all the basses I wanted to own during that time happened to be active. A couple of years ago I decided I fancied a change and got a passive Jazz and then a precision.
Unfortunately I was so used to active that for some reason I just couldn't get the sound I wanted from those passive basses so now I use a pre-amp pedal with the jazz, added an active circuit to the precision and bought an active Sterling SUB Ray to go with then and I'm happy again.
I love the sound of passive precision and jazz basses - but only it seems when it's someone else playing them for some reason!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I love active basses. All my basses have been active or very soon became active. Why? Well, I personally like to have the ability to drive my tone from the bass and a smooth pickup pan facility. I love Jazz basses but can't get on with the two volume set up. Pan pot every time.

And I change batteries regularly enough that sudden battery death isn't an overriding worry.

[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1484603254' post='3216807']
Unless the controls on your bass do something very different such as the filter EQ of the Wal or ACG, or they allow you to EQ each pickup separately, I really can't see the point as all they do is duplicate what you should already have available on your amp.
[/quote]

And my approach is the opposite of this. My amp is adjusted at sound check (simply any necessary room based tweaks to a largely flat EQ setting) and then tonal changes all come from the bass - from changes in pickup pan, EQ or plucking style and position. Horses, courses etc. Neither approach is right or wrong.

Edited by TrevorR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[u]Anthony Jackson, James Jamerson, Jaco Pastorius, Pino Palladino[/u].

They all played passive instruments, and their tone is amazing so any argument for better tone goes out the window. Different tone, sure. Think Marcus Miller for that, but that's not what I'm going for.

I just don't like fiddling while I'm playing. If I need to change the tone, I change what I'm doing with my hands.

And you only need it to happen once when a battery fails on stage to know that relying on a £3 battery as a crucial chain in your signal path is not cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jazzjames' timestamp='1484635684' post='3216954']
[u]Anthony Jackson, James Jamerson, Jaco Pastorius, Pino Palladino[/u].

They all played passive instruments, and their tone is amazing so any argument for better tone goes out the window. Different tone, sure. Think Marcus Miller for that, but that's not what I'm going for.

I just don't like fiddling while I'm playing. If I need to change the tone, I change what I'm doing with my hands.

And you only need it to happen once when a battery fails on stage to know that relying on a £3 battery as a crucial chain in your signal path is not cool.
[/quote]
Personal preference again.
What about different styles of music?
What about the £3 patch cable on your pedalboard or kettle lead? The wire from the pickup to the Jack? There are so many cheap parts in a signal chain it's amazing anything works :-D
Some will want to make adjustments without walking back to their amp. Some will find passive tone controls do the job.
There is no argument that can't be turned over the other way.
Personal preference. 👍

Edited by Bolo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Learned on a passive bass, if it was good enough for Jaco...
then...
Oooh look at this new thing, some people on this forum say this thing is amazing I must sell off all my basses to have just active basses...
then...
Don't like active basses - not for me, going back to simple passive 4 strings, leo got it right...
then...
Ooh look a 5th string, some people on a forum say I should try it. I'm going to sell all my 4 strings and replace them with 5 - they mostly are active
then...
ooh look new bells and whistles preamps from East/ACG/Aguilar/Glockenklang/Ebay, people rave about these, I'm going to fit them on all my basses
then...
Don't like active basses - not for me, going back to simple passive 4 strings, leo got it right...

repeat ad infinitum ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I have all flavours, active, passive and active/passive switchable. Don't use effects though.

I have no strong preference but in terms of live work as I use a wireless system I generally prefer active basses as I can stand out in the room and tweak a couple of things to seek the best sound and it saves walking back and forth to the head to change settings.

My amp is run with everything flat with the honourable exception of a tiny bit of mid boost. That having been said I've played the last few gigs with the bass into a DI box into the desk and then fed back through the on-stage monitors.

When a band is in full tilt I think it's pretty hard to tell what the bass is so for me it's just the convenience of having a preamp a few inches from my hand rather than several yards away :) . I very rarely change settings post sound-check.

Edited by ead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1484603254' post='3216807']
Unless the controls on your bass do something very different such as the filter EQ of the Wal or ACG, or they allow you to EQ each pickup separately, I really can't see the point as all they do is duplicate what you should already have available on your amp.
[/quote]That depends on the preamp. As you know,some preamps have a sound that might be preferable to the player,that they can't get from there amplifier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='LukeFRC' timestamp='1484640287' post='3216985']
Learned on a passive bass, if it was good enough for Jaco...
then...
Oooh look at this new thing, some people on this forum say this thing is amazing I must sell off all my basses to have just active basses...
then...
Don't like active basses - not for me, going back to simple passive 4 strings, leo got it right...
then...
Ooh look a 5th string, some people on a forum say I should try it. I'm going to sell all my 4 strings and replace them with 5 - they mostly are active
then...
ooh look new bells and whistles preamps from East/ACG/Aguilar/Glockenklang/Ebay, people rave about these, I'm going to fit them on all my basses
then...
Don't like active basses - not for me, going back to simple passive 4 strings, leo got it right...

repeat ad infinitum ....
[/quote]

Phew! Thank God, I'm doing it right then.
All I would correct above is the "Leo got it right". I must go round my basses and fit hi-mass bridges and light weight tuners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I`ve had a few active basses and all were good, but for me I prefer to just have one pickup, one tone control, and get one sound and hammer away. That said, when I was depping for a rock covers band I used an active Precision that had P/J pickups and it was incredibly useful at achieving the tones approximate to the original versions of the songs I was playing so I`d say tools for the job really. More efficient to do it all with one bass than carry a load around to gigs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='grandad' timestamp='1484599867' post='3216751']
I don't want to have the hassle of battery changing. I like to keep things very simple and straightforward, less to go wrong, and less likely to forget something.

I don't want any more knobs to play with, I have quite sufficient.
[/quote]

This :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never knew this was an issue. I haven't owned an active bass but I do like the sound of a Stingray for example.
As said it's just personal taste.
I could get by quite happily with no batteries or control knobs and just have a kill switch. But if you like more than one sound or the sound of a particular active bass I can see how an active eq on the bass would be useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to remember this coming up before :D

Factually, the only passive bass is an acoustic bass. All basses that generate a voltage are amplified, some at the amp, some at the instrument as well (and some at the instrument, pedal board x X, and the amp etc....). So that lovely passive signal that some folk rave about gets amplified just the same.

I don't think anyone has mentioned this but the main reason that basses themselves had a pre amp fitted was to boost the signal because of degradation through the cable. EQ came along a little bit later because it was an obvious development.

The other big difference is that active EQ allows you to add as well as take away. I've got one passive bass in my herd of 9 and as it's a 4 it doesn't get used anyway (which is a bit sad as it's a lovely double cut LP with T'bird pups). I know what the EQ does on all my basses including full fat ACG filter equipped so I don't fiddle with it, I use it.

In the range of onboard pre-amplification there is a vast choice of options, settings and prices. Things like sweepable mid control and a high pass filter to remove the cab threatening lower rumbling are invaluable to me. The John East pre-amps in passive mode retain proper passive blend and tone control btw.

Those that struggle with any more than a single tone control had better keep away from my full spec Uber ACG Finn :D 10 coils per pickup, 2 Low Pass filters each with a resonant peak control and a mid boost pull switch, a sweepable mid control and a passive knob too (hooray) that is actually very useful as it works in active as well as passive and is great for rolling off some tone easily. So the best of both worlds. I'll happily go through it with anyone and once set I use blend and passive tone to change my sound - just like a passive 2 pickup bass.

Each to their own, I'm a very average ability player and there's a lot of you guys that have a passive Fender P bass and would knock me into a cocked hat :D

Peter

Edited by GreeneKing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='grandad' timestamp='1484599867' post='3216751']
I don't want to have the hassle of battery changing. I like to keep things very simple and straightforward, less to go wrong, and less likely to forget something.

I don't want any more knobs to play with, I have quite sufficient.
[/quote]

I think this sums up the position of many, from what I've heard, more than actives having an inherent sound (which I don't think they do, they are all different).

For some the battery is a 'hassle'. Some think that replacing a battery once a year is hardly a 'hassle' (myself included), but the thing is I don't choose a bass because it's active, I choose it because I like how it sounds, and active/passive is just not a factor... if it has a battery I'll deal with it, if it doesn't, then it doesn't. If, however, the bass you like is passive... then you can see how adding an active circuit may seem unnecessary, if what it adds is not interesting enough for you, so yeah, then it's a 'hassle'.

I don't worry about electronics going wrong or batteries. The risk is minimal, negligible, to me. But that's just me. There's nothing 'superior' about active or passive... or one vs multiple pickups. "Oh, but two pickups are more versatile, you get a wider range of tones, so it's better". No, it isn't better *for me* if the sound I like is the one coming from a specific one-pickup bass.

Some, like grandad above, mention liking things simple, fewer controls etc, and I sympathise with that. Having had basses with multiple switches and 3-4 band EQ... I find them distracting. But again, that's just me and my personal preference.

My personal preference is active EQ, onboard, because I like the ability to tweak the sound just so at my fingertips. But a lot of preamp/instrument combinations leave me cold, so I guess I'm mostly talking about particular preamps in particular basses. I would not prefer just any active bass over any passive bass. I like my Precision passive as it is, thank you very much. I like my JJ and P/JJ passive too... a Jazz I like either way, and a Stingray active because their preamp seems just right for that instrument, to me.

It all boils down to how much you like a given instrument... if it's active you will embrace the battery etc, if it's not then you won't have a reason to put up with it (even if it's just a once a year event)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All my basses have East preamps in them - I use a fair spread of tones in the function band, and I don't want to faff with my backline to do it - especially if we're using in-ears without backline :D

I don't have any axe to grind either way; it is, as has been pointed out several times, all down to personal taste and preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As stated, it's a matter of personal taste. I prefer passive. More organic to my ears. I also don't like the look of plastic battery compartments in the back of a bass, nor having to worry about batteries. But then i'm also of the belief that a bass only needs one pickup, in the sweet spot. :happy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a few aspects to consider:

- traditional tones vs. modern scooped tones (musical fashion)

I for myself, I have several reasons playing only passive instruments these days, but they all come back to the same point: sound!

I did one album production with two active hi-end JJs and PJs where I had major sound issues. the studio guy (not the tech) brought in a passive JJ, a passive P and a Rick and from there on, everything went fine from there on.

I discovered that passive instruments are "better" sounding especially in the studio. They produce less annoying (to the song) frequencies and are better audible (frequency-wise) in a mix.
As far as dynamics are concerned, according to a very reputable preamp builder, a preamp needs at least 27 volts (as opposed to 18 or even 9 volts) to provide the same headroom as a pure passive bass.

I have been playing active JJs and PJs (Sadowsky, esh, Trace Elliot, Lakland,...) for a very long time. As soon as I got my first passive Nordstrand VP5, I haven't bought a single active bass again.
Nowadays I am using two Nordy VP5, a Reverend Rumblefish R5L, a Squier JV P and an Epiphone Jack Casady and all of them do fit right into the mix of any band I am playing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm easy, have both and never really give it much thought.
If i use my passive basses i adjust the amp as required or needed.
If i use my active basses i use both the amp or bass EQ as required.

I'm more interested in whether i like playing the bass.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either is fine with me. Passive P bass - great. Active Stingray - great.

The one instrument that straddles the boundaries well is my Big Al SSS which is basically a bizarre 3 pickup bass that nails a P bass tone, and the active/passive switchover is so incredibly well refined that both are worth using all the time.

The main issue is a GOOD passive tone control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading previous posts, IMO replacing a battery is less hassle than changing strings and less frequent. What can go wrong with active Electrics on basses? They hardly ever go wrong these days, and most preamps have a "get you home" passive option anyway.

They are only as difficult to operate as you want to make them. At the very least you can start with all the controls in the middle and work back and forwards from there.

I have 2 passive basses and 3 active basses and I just had to stop and think which was which! My Lull Jazz is an 18v pre amp. My first experience of one of these. Yet again the sloppiness in my technique has been exposed! This bass has a level of clarity and punch that I've not experienced before. It sounds amazing. Buy the bass you like the sound of, if it's active or passive is something that should be discovered later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='markstuk' timestamp='1484599704' post='3216748']
It's the normal basschat argument fodder..:-)

Other examples include

Pbass vs everything else
Fender vs everything else
Flats vs rounds
Neo vs ferrite
Valve vs everything else
Class D vs everything else..

😂[/quote]

I dream of living in a world where "pick vs fingers" isn't so regularly debated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Burrito' timestamp='1484649074' post='3217089']

I dream of living in a world where "pick vs fingers" isn't so regularly debated.
[/quote]

:D

perhaps we should make a naughty list that can't be discussed... ?

4 strings versus 5 strings
Long scale B string vs "standard/short" B string

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...