planethead Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 (edited) ...winter approaches and my street corner is getting chilly so time for a little restoration project to see me through the yule. I know there have been disparaging comments regarding the 'nobbly' neds on we-flay but I like the approach here. [attachment=14970:P1010024_1.jpg][attachment=14974:P1010013_1.jpg][attachment=14971:P1010015_1.jpg] [u]HISTORY[/u] Short scale bought from Andy's (Denmark Street) around 1979/80; I understand they replaced the original bridge and fitted the JPUP, relocating the jack socket to accommodate the additional JPUP volume (metal knob marked 'T') [attachment=14972:P1010016_1.jpg] A quality endorsement from John Entwistle bodes well... [attachment=15166:nedc.jpg][attachment=15167:nedc2.jpg] "Ned Callan" - A pseudonym for British custom luthier Peter Cook. [url="http://www.shergold.co.uk/burnsbook.html"]Shergold[/url] were commisioned to make these guitars that were designed by Peter. Shergold are known to have produced both the "Cody" and "Hombre" under this arrangement. Due to their "distinctive" (read weird, though not displeasing) appearance these guitars quickly earned the nickname of "nobbly Neds". Some "Shaftesbury" models - made for the catch-all brand established by the Rosetti Music company to cover various unknown brand imports (principally from Japan and Korea) and home grown (typically) cheap models. The Shaftesbury brand appears on many musical items aside from guitars. [i]Shergold Guitars Forum[/i] [b]Several mentions (and a pic!) of Peter Cook for context:[/b] [url="http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/equipment/bass/equip-entwistlegear-74-85.html"]http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/equipment/ba...gear-74-85.html[/url] [b]Norman Holder (Shergold) answered a few questions about the Ned Callan's, in particular the neck.[/b] [attachment=14973:P1010018_1.jpg] [indent]"The number is not the amount, 7 could be model code and 23 the amount or 7 for July and 23 the day. Peter got us to make his guitars when he found he couldn't get the quality himself or the quantity we were the sub contractors." "The models we made were made from Mahogany (Sapele) the necks as well the truss rod was my two way design,the cases were made by a guy Henry Glass up in Essex " "The zero fret was something we inherited from Burns,so all the necks we made had the zero fret. All our necks were suplied seperately with screw holes,but the necks could have been glued in after they left our factory,Petes first ones could have been glued in only Pete could confirm this."[/indent] [b]Another post from the Shergold forum by Norman Houlder. Referring to a guitar but probably applies to all the necks he made:[/b] [indent]"The truss rod was my push pull type with Tpiece,and shaped groove,trouble with the original necks were the groove was a true segment(tapering out at both ends)which cuased the neck to S then I found out that the rod worked bettder with only half a segment and didn't need to go right along the length of the neck as you couldn't make the thick part bend unless u had a 2ton press."[/indent] [b]Some additional info gleaned from another site ([url="http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.guitar.bass/2007-02/msg02528.html"]here[/url]) the subject of discussion is one of the 'Shaftesbury' Ned Callan's and reiterates previous information.[/b] [indent]"Shaftesbury was a brand name covering a lot of different big name knock-offs during that period when just about anything got copied by the Japanese and no-one seemed to care. NOT made in England...the original NC bass was. A nothing special Japanese-made bass, probably screwed together by [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matsumoku"]Matsomuku[/url] or one of the other jobbing builders of that era and distributed in the UK by the now defunct Rose-Morris company... I think. Not expensive but OK for the money and not a collector's item I'd have thought. Don't get burnt...it's a Japanese knock off . The serial number won't help. I had a shop during the 70's and 80's and sold Shaftesbury guitars and basses. They were all copies made in Japan, some of the real cheapies were made in Italy. They were distributed by Rose Morris whose premises were in Shaftesbury Avenue, London hence the name. Shergold made the NC and were still in business during that period and would not have put 'Shaftesbury' on them...way too down market. I searched Google and found an NC for sale, totally not original and the ad stated it was made by Peter Cook under the Shaftesbury name which does not make any sense and I do not recall seeing any mention of such a tie up in the catalogue at the time. Being a bass player that would have been of interest to me. Interestingly the photo showed the bass with the truss rod cover missing which would have had the S/bury name on it. Peter Cook made Strats, Teles and P+J basses from Mighty Mite parts in those days...we sold those too and he never mentioned that scenario to me. Bottom line...the only genuine NC to the best of my knowledge was made exclusively by Shergold. Caveat emptor"[/indent] UPDATE (20/10/08) Pickguard removed to reveal routing etc. No stamps or QC stickers other than that on the headstock. moved the jack socket back to where I think it probably started. Also neck is a tight but not accurate fit in the pocket. With all electronics removed - still have to test the truss rod. [attachment=14978:P1010022.jpg][attachment=15048:P1010001.jpg] UPDATE (23/10/08) some bits and bobs.... [attachment=15912:P1010003.jpg][attachment=15913:P1010004.jpg] [attachment=15914:P1010006.jpg][attachment=15915:P1010007.jpg] old school wiring indeed.. probably pick up microwave radiation from space on those... [attachment=15921:oldschwiring.jpg] UPDATE (24/10/08) The original design may owe more to Gibson than Dan Armstrong. The '59 EB0 from: [url="http://shortscalebass.blogspot.com/"]http://shortscalebass.blogspot.com/[/url] Gibson started using the 3 point bridge (still with chrome-plated bridge cover) in 1973. This was a far more reliable design, and is still in use today. This bridge design does not incorporate the string mute of earlier models. [url="http://www.flyguitars.com/gibson/bass/"]Fly Guitars[/url] [attachment=15142:Gibson_eb2_dc.0.jpg][attachment=15160:3ptbridgesmall.jpg] UPDATE (26/10/08) Time for some measurements (suitably vintage in inches): - 22 frets excluding the 'zero' fret. - 13 5/8 from the bottom edge of the neck pocket to the rump. - 9 1/8" from the neck pocket to the original bridge fixing holes. - 30" total length of neck from tip of headstock The neck is not in line with the fixings for the original bridge - but correct for the replacement 3-point. The removed or damaged lacquer suggests the neck may have been removed and then re-glued. [attachment=15191:P1010001_1.jpg] Damage to the binding could be to replace a damaged nut (the current one is not in great condition and has not been well made (or at least not treated very well) or perhaps the wood has contracted with changes in humidity pushing the zero fret into the binding and cracking it? [attachment=15190:P1010005.jpg] UPDATE (29/10/08) ...brrrr sure is cold on the street today! More beer, more pot and more hookers required... My plan: - NOT to separate the neck (for now) - fill the JPUP cavity - fill and repair hole left by JPUP volume control mod - add hipshot supertone bridge - the footprint of the HS should cover the original bridge fixing holes and the front mounting hole - DM Model One PUP (modify cavity to fit if required) - re-use existing components/wire (replace damaged capacitor) - remake scratchplate which should look like this...I hope! [attachment=15330:ncmockup.jpg] If the instrument feels and sounds good... - strip body and re lacquer (shellac) -replace nut - repair damaged lacquer on neck UPDATE (07/11/08) Not a lot of progress but moving in the right direction....new scratchplate underway; Shiny tuners...; Replaced old 3 point with Hipshot Supertone... [attachment=15680:P1010001_3.jpg][attachment=15685:P1010003_1.jpg][attachment=15688:P1010004_2.jpg] restrung yesterday with cut down long scale 'heavy' gauge (not a good idea with hindsight) and noticed considerable increase in sustain...the bridge is not yet sitting flush and the action even with the bridge saddles set down is an astonishing 5mm... having fired off a few arrows with the nedster will have to rethink the approach. Trying to avoid removing the neck so may have to rout into the body; lowering the height of the bridge block by a few mm. and since I'm going to be getting the router out to fit this... [attachment=15686:P1010006_2.jpg] It might turn out fine on the corner again :-) UPDATE (08/11/08) Had the router out this morning to fit the Model One.. and managed to fit the hipshot flush to the body. Replaced the cap and lashed together some temporary wiring ready to take pics and record some samples... only to discover one of the riff-raff had been off taking pictures and used up all the juice.... ..so detuned strings to avoid launching hipshot at neighbours..left camera on to charge..and wil return in short while with some sound samples and pics...splendid Camera still charging so press on with audio... that's one hot pick-up! The action with the saddles down is approx 3/32 at the 12 fret and 5.5/32 at the 22. The pickup pole (set as low as possible) is 6/32 from the E. Pulled the saddles back as far as they go but cannot get intonation correct at the 12 fret still a few points sharp - probably doesn't help using cut down long scale guage 50-110!!!! Time for some audio (nothing fancy now...) : tone full up - the E sustains to silence [attachment=15724:NC_tone_up_sus.wav] tone down [attachment=15723:NC_tone_down.wav] tone / volume variations [attachment=15725:NC_tone_vol_var.wav] some cheeky chords [attachment=15726:NC_two_note.wav] and a bit of noodling with vol pot lower [attachment=15722:NC_noodle.wav] Going to remove bridge as tension is pulling out the fixings - don't want any catapault incidents so no pics but the nedster looks like the mock-up image. UPDATE (09/11/08) String tension is pulling the bridge insert out of the badly repaired wood. [attachment=15742:P1010002.jpg] And since a whole new discussion is starting up as to whether to remove the neck - I've decide to call in the supercharged oxford detective and get busy! Dirty.....but sweet! [attachment=15846:P1010001_10.jpg][attachment=15847:P1010002_10.jpg] Patch up some holes (the neck pu needed two blocks!); cut the plugs down to size; PU glue and clamp (or mallet!) ; plug in and glue from the inside...ready to work from the outside. [attachment=15848:infill1.jpg][attachment=15849:infill2.jpg] [attachment=15850:infill3.jpg][attachment=15854:infill5.jpg] [attachment=15851:infill4.jpg][attachment=15855:infill8.jpg] [attachment=15831:P1010001_13.jpg][attachment=15853:infill7.jpg] [attachment=15852:infill6.jpg][attachment=15832:P1010002_13.jpg] UPDATE (12/11/08) Re-measured the scale length again from crown of the zero fret to crown of the 12th = 15" giving 30" scale. Set bridge saddles to intonation 'mid' points. Positioned the supertone with the original 3 point bridge fixing holes. Measured a distance of 30" from the crown of the zero fret to a point just in front of the E,A saddles and just behind the G,D saddles. So the old bridge WAS in the right place (I'm the duffer here :-O adding 2/8" from the nut!) Fashioned a 5mm ply template for the pickguard (first two attempts OK but could do better!) and one for the PU. Re-measured scale length for the umpteenth time settled on bridge position approx 5 mm back from the original holes ... [attachment=15919:templates.jpg][attachment=15920:commitment.jpg] Drilled so committed. Shudder....! UPDATE (15/11/08) Sand everywhere...nothing but sand and sandpaper. 80g to get rid of the sanding sealer and dye. Back up through 120g to 180g for the grain filler. This reveals the scratches left by going against the grain with the 80g..so back we go... still too much stain left inside the horns and waist. Need a sanding drum for the drill. Quite hard to get around the neck joint without causing damage to the lacquer on the neck. UPDATE (19/11/08) Took back to 80g but made the filler too thin - by the time it was dry and sanded back to 180g a lot of it had disappeared! So 3rd time lucky with the filler! Meanwhile got a sanding drum which enables you to replace sandpaper as required no pre-made sandpaper sleeves. Best to use the fabric backed sp - the paper stuff is too difficult to work into the drum. Another good tip picked up from [url="http://www.reranch.com/101.htm"]here[/url] - use a single edged or stanley knife blade to scrape up the excess filler once it has dried to a pinkish colour. Dragging the blade 'across' the grain using as little pressure to move it as possible. Definitely saves time and mess when sanding. [attachment=16174:scraping.jpg] Decided to grain fill twice on the front and once on the back to compare. Having sanded up to 240 grit on both sides the front is *considerably* smoother so should provide a good base for the lacquer. Also noticed quite a few pinholes appearing once the filler has been sanded back. I think this may be to do with changes in temp or humidity although did notice tiny bubbles appearing while applying the stuff. So maybe its trapped air? These 'eruptions' dry proud of the surface and probably get wiped scraped or sanded off leaving a pinhole. Finally managed to put a bevel on the scratchplate using a chamfer bit - this was something of a performance! But worth it to get this not very clear profile 45 deg angle across the top two plys then straight down the third ply. [attachment=16173:pickguard2.jpg][attachment=16172:pickguard1.jpg] Key to this was constructing a jig which ensured the surface of the router remained level at all times - managed to skid of the edge of the test piece a few times before figuring this one out! Single edged blade or stanley knife again to tidy up any uneven moments. I think with patience you could do some quite nifty stuff to a pickguard with a blade - I started experimenting with slightly more daring curves and bevels - oooh! UPDATE (21/11/08) Short pause while waiting for the first coat of sanding sealer to go off. This stuff stinks. Face mask and ventilation required - didn't check the brush carefully and noticed bits of old paint and whatnot starting to appear :-( Off for a second coat. Bl**dy h*ll this stuff really stinks and dries very quickly - to reiterate; dust free environment and a super clean brush essential. I'm doing this in stages: front first, back second and finally the sides because it dries quickly and I imagine trying to do this in one go would be a nightmare of stickiness and.. stench! Nearly double-coated everything. Sand paper out again this afternoon. The sealer does make the wood look good. Amazing - bit dark to take pictures but will do so tomorrow. The colour is almost back to its post-lacquer striptease tint. Got to watch out for drips down the sides - end up sanding right through the sealer to get them out. UPDATE (22-23/11/08) Disaster! ..ish. Managed to sand through two small areas in the sealer - quick drop fill - sand - aagh not quite dry now I have a bigger hole to fill. After several attempts to rescue the prep - its starting to look like the Somme! No choice but to do the front again. Bum!!!! However. This is a good opportunity to try doing something the wrong way round. Originally I had applied sealer sanded then added a coat of 'deep' (naturally) mahogany stain. This time I'll stain the bare wood and then apply sealer - hopefully the sealer which darkens the wood anyway will intensify the colour. UPDATE (24/11/08) mmm... did I say hopefully? Tried staining first let dry and apply sealer the sealer sank! slap a bit more on that's better arggh pinholes where are they coming from - more sealer...more pinholes. As you can tell this was an idea way ahead of its time. Back to bare again. Third time lucky I hope. Sorry there aren't any pics it's just too depressing :-( UPDATE (28/11/08) Marathon sanding sealer session complete, not sure if that's a great improvement but in danger of chasing my own tail so moving on. Routed out pickup for Model One - fitted scratchplate. Damn managed to cut a gnats too much off for the heel so have to move the sp forward to cover. If the sun comes out I'll take some pics. Well the sun hasn't come out but here's a pic of un-finished work so far.. actually looks a bit darker than this [attachment=16544:latest.jpg] I think it's mojo remains intact - quite the dapper! [attachment=16574:nedwide1.jpg][attachment=16575:nedwide2.jpg] Unfortunately I had to put this together to cheer myself up among the list of disasters today. some misalignment with the pu cavity/scratchplate screwholes etc - soluble I think. slight concern re alignment of bridge. cocked up the scratchplate around the bridge... and the previously damaged and badly repaired nut broke loosening the binding as well. Fast coming to the conclusion I should have taken that bloody neck off in the first place!!! UPDATE 14/12/08 Nothing really new to report. Too cold now to get into spraying nitro so will leave this until the New Year. Have a nice Christmas. ttfn BTW only sticking everything in this post so I can find it again - love to hear your thoughts (not in any psychic paranormal way - that would be deafening! :-O ) Edited December 14, 2008 by planethead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgt-pluck Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 (edited) I love a good restoration thread - keep it coming - with pics please Pluck Edited October 20, 2008 by sgt-pluck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_citizenbass Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 thats a good looking bass! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tait Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 when i first saw it i didnt like it, but its growing on me. i think that j pup needs a black pup cover rather than white and itll look great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neepheid Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 Dunno what to tell you. Obviously a faithful restoration is only as faithful as the information gleaned about the original. If it is a cut'n'shut anyway then I don't suppose there are any rules. Those tuners look mighty familiar For a basic stab at the type of body wood, I'd say mahogany. Pics are a little too small to be sure though. As for the neck pickup, I'd be tempted to rout it out and put a beefy humbucker a la Gibson EB-0/3 - depending on string spacing and all that of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotspanna Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 I have an early Ned Callan Salisbury guitar with glued neck - All Mahogony with twin maple inserts in the neck. It is a seriously well made guitar. The neck action is fantastic and the sound it makes is amzing. Mine is not original electrics pick up wise though....I am happy with it though.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu-khag Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 great thread and a great looking guitar. all the very best and looking forward to more pics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprocket123 Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 [quote name='Stu-khag' timestamp='1326484045' post='1497961'] great thread and a great looking guitar. all the very best and looking forward to more pics [/quote] +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.