Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, TheGreek said:

An improvement IMO

Yamaha Bb604 Bass Active For Sale in Malahide, Dublin from Averyjohn

The thing is, they’re not really the same thing...

You should buy a bb404 and a bb414 and swap the electronics over...you’ll only be about £250/300 out of pocket...winner.

Posted
22 minutes ago, AndyTravis said:

I picked a 414 (same pickups as 424) over a 1024.

just so the balance in the force is restored 

Yeah try both @Reggaebass.

I've ended up with the opposite love to Andy. Well not that opposite really, given they are both Yammy BBs, lol!

Wouldn't the world be a boring place if we all liked the same thing. 4 billion blokes all after Scarlett Johannson...

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Al Krow said:

Yeah try both @Reggaebass.

I've ended up with the opposite love to Andy. Well not that opposite really, given they are both Yammy BBs, lol!

Wouldn't the world be a boring place if we all liked the same thing. 4 billion blokes all after Scarlett Johannson...

See, I find her as sexy as a ball bearing.

  • Haha 1
Posted

reminds me of the old joke:

Psychiatrist 'Vot zeems to be zee problem?'.

man 'I just LOVE cream buns'

Psychiatrist: 'Vell, I see nosink wrong vis zat, I rather like zem myzelve'

Man 'Really - you too?  Aren't they just so damned sexy!'

Posted
1 hour ago, Al Krow said:

the 424 is a little "flatter" and the 1024 / 2024 more harmonically rich in terms of pups

While both the 424 pickups are usable, I'm finding that I leave the switch set to both pretty much the entire time, which I guess bears out your comment. They make two quite different sounds, but ones which blend together well.

Posted
35 minutes ago, TheGreek said:

An improvement IMO

Yamaha Bb604 Bass Active For Sale in Malahide, Dublin from Averyjohn

I used to have the BB605, while the body was nice the neck didn't feel too great compared to other BB's I've played  

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, Al Krow said:

Yeah try both

I had the 414 but it turned out it had a problem with the truss rod and I couldn’t get the action low enough for me, but I really liked the way it sounded and the playability, very different from my jazzes and P’s , so I’m thinking I’ll try another Yamaha 🙂

Edited by Reggaebass
Posted
4 minutes ago, Reggaebass said:

I had the 414 but it turned out it had a problem with the truss rod and I couldn’t get the action low enough for me, but I really liked the way it sounded and the playability, very different from my jazzes and P’s , so I’m thinking I’ll try another 🙂

Is there a vintage white 414 in the for sale threads? 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, AndyTravis said:

I picked a 414 (same pickups as 424) over a 1024.

just so the balance in the force is restored 

Without wanting to unbalance anything, that's exactly what I did...I only had half an hour with a 2024, but I thought it was really, really good.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Muzz said:

Without wanting to unbalance anything, that's exactly what I did...I only had half an hour with a 2024, but I thought it was really, really good.

I loved my 1024, but it was like a smoother sounding 414 - then I just preferred the 414, and could get that same sound by backing off the tone control a midge. So...🤷🏻‍♂️

Posted
29 minutes ago, Reggaebass said:

Does the 1024 have a dual action truss rod, as I think my 414 had a single action one 

P10 of the manual: EB Owner's manual_EN.pdf (yamaha.com)

Have to 'fess I've not had to touch the set-up on my 1025 and certainly not had to adust the truss rod - was perfectly set-up for me straight from the Yammy Store in London.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, AndyTravis said:

Ah yeah, that. Hahah. I forget 

So was a single action truss rod a feature of the 414 that got sorted when the 424 came out, together with Yamaha providing a laminate neck? 

I think otherwise the models are pretty identical, right?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Al Krow said:

So was a single action truss rod a feature of the 414 that got sorted when the 424 came out, together with Yamaha providing a laminate neck? 

I think otherwise the models are pretty identical, right?

I really can’t remember the truss rod now, long time since I had the 425.

the 45 degree through body stringing and laminated neck were the differences.

 

Posted

I'm a bit partial to a laminate neck (for stability and strength and they can also look good)...and love the fact that they come as standard on Yammy BBs these days.

Body through stringing according to Yamaha: "The traditional method in which strings are bent induces stress when transmitting string vibration. Diagonal Body Thru Stringing significantly reduces [stress] transferring string vibration to the body reliably and efficiently."

But does it really make a difference to anything much?

Loss of the neck through option both from appearance and ability for the bass to "sing" on the higher end models is the thing I'd like to see addressed more than anything else. Available now only on the flagship NE2. 

Posted

Think Multi Lam necks are cool - and I’d certainly associate them with earlier BB models.

I think a good 1 piece neck is still better than a not so good laminate...I know it was a common feature on Jaydee basses, but I had a supernatural and I couldn’t get it to settle...

And I’ve seen a few basses with twists/warps where the wood hasn’t been seasoned or done right with laminate necks.

Yamaha obviously seem to get it right.

I would like a 424x in red, or white - even black would be ok. I keep an eye out,

Posted
7 minutes ago, Al Krow said:

 

Loss of the neck through option both from appearance and ability for the bass to "sing" on the higher end models is the thing I'd like to see addressed more than anything else. Available now only on the flagship NE2. 

I certainly agree with respect to appearance. Thinks neck thru Warwick Thumb circa 1989 and drools......

I'm a little amazed at how the BBPH manages to achieve this 'sing'. In a large part I suspect due to the 3 piece body sandwich with maple at it's core. The attention to fixing the neck to body is a part of this too I'm sure. I did see a photo that hinted at an additional location 'tang' on the neck. Not sure about this though and I don't want to remove my neck to find out.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Al Krow said:

I'm a bit partial to a laminate neck (for stability and strength and they can also look good)...and love the fact that they come as standard on Yammy BBs these days.

Body through stringing according to Yamaha: "The traditional method in which strings are bent induces stress when transmitting string vibration. Diagonal Body Thru Stringing significantly reduces [stress] transferring string vibration to the body reliably and efficiently."

But does it really make a difference to anything much?

My TRBX has a laminated neck, four bolt join and a regular bridge. My BB424 has the same laminated neck and four bolt join plus the 45° through body stringing. The difference in how the strings sound unplugged is massive, the BB feels alive in comparison.

The other factors: the TRBX body is smaller, which the neck doesnt go as far into; the BB is 2mm wider and 3mm thicker. 

Which is the most important factor? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...