Andyjr1515 Posted March 29, 2017 Author Share Posted March 29, 2017 (edited) [quote name='TheGreek' timestamp='1490708420' post='3267233'] Am I being too demanding by asking for something like this??? Or has Andy 's previous work left me believing he can do anything.... Maybe he should have titled this thread "Great Expectations".. [/quote] Do you know...what I love about the full-custom builds, as well as the sheer adrenaline rush of spending months on something that might end up as barbecue wood, is this kind of thing. Generally my approach is practical. That is, it [i]has[/i] to work and it [i]has [/i]to be workable. On the other hand - a bit like my wife when we are trying to sort a new kitchen layout - often the people I'm building for are completely unshackled by such trivia Just like my wife might say - "well I want a large wide passageway THERE!" - pointing to the one wall that absolutely holds the whole of the rest of the house up. And then a strange process happens. Once I've exhausted myself with all the reasons why the bloody passageway CAN'T be wide and CAN'T be there, I let just a chink of the impracticality to creep into my thinking and, often come up with a solution that DOES have a wide passageway, and it IS there, but, now I come to think about it, doing it this way and adding this and changing that will actually make the building stronger and the whole kitchen job easier. The result is often MUCH better than it would have been without being faced with the wholly impossible Which a very long way of saying that, actually, Mick's idea above is a pretty good one. I am going to use the steinberger-style tuner block that Mick sent me, and below you can see it can be secured. But the string angles are a bit compromised, which I always try to avoid: But I can't tilt the tuner mechanism and more because the (retaining wall) bass body is in the way. So what if I knock the (retaining wall) body out of the way? Like this: You know....that might just work..... Edited March 29, 2017 by Andyjr1515 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedX Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 You should also have a look at the Pagelli Golden Bass, which is one of the very first basses that I saw which had the full-length fingerboard (and tuners at the back of the body IIRC). There aren't any images on the Pagelli site right now, but a quick Google should reveal some... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted March 29, 2017 Author Share Posted March 29, 2017 [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1490803442' post='3268203'] You should also have a look at the Pagelli Golden Bass, which is one of the very first basses that I saw which had the full-length fingerboard (and tuners at the back of the body IIRC). There aren't any images on the Pagelli site right now, but a quick Google should reveal some... [/quote] Will do - thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BassApprentice Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 http://www.pagelli.com/e-guitars-innovations.html Third from the bottom Very classy looking bass that Golden Fretless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samhay Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 [quote name='Andyjr1515' timestamp='1490791836' post='3268007'] [/quote] Could you not alternatively fix the bridge to the neck side of the cavity (by flipping upside down from the above orientation)? I would imagine this would make it stronger... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted March 30, 2017 Author Share Posted March 30, 2017 [quote name='BassApprentice' timestamp='1490859787' post='3268499'] [url="http://www.pagelli.com/e-guitars-innovations.html"]http://www.pagelli.c...nnovations.html[/url] Third from the bottom Very classy looking bass that Golden Fretless [/quote] Yes indeed - it was one of the photos Mick sent to me when he was describing the full-length fretboard concept. It's something else isn't it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted March 30, 2017 Author Share Posted March 30, 2017 (edited) [quote name='samhay' timestamp='1490863679' post='3268553'] Could you not alternatively fix the bridge to the neck side of the cavity (by flipping upside down from the above orientation)? I would imagine this would make it stronger... [/quote] Yes you could, but that would make accessing the screw holes to fix it in very tricky without either having a line of access holes in the back part of the fretboard or having the string exit slot much wider. Attaching the ball ends to the tuner pullers would also be a bit more awkward as you would be doing it blind. I'm actually happy that the fixing will be as strong as any standard bridge fixing. I am presently working on tweaking the angle so that the strings have a straight pull on the tuners, though, and trying to get that bridge position back a bit. That means either exposing the tuners from the front view a touch, or increasing the angle the tuners are coming out of the back. As I said earlier, a bass is basically a set of compromises held together by determination and hope! Edited March 30, 2017 by Andyjr1515 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stearstree1304 Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 I've turned my back for 5 minutes and there's another build thread!! Needless to say I am following this enthusiastically!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRedX Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 [quote name='Andyjr1515' timestamp='1490863758' post='3268555'] Yes indeed - it was one of the photos Mick sent to me when he was describing the full-length fretboard concept. It's something else isn't it! [/quote] I was going to order one, but unfortunately when I enquired, Pagelli had just licensed the design to Marleaux, who never bothered to get in touch with me, so I ended up commissioning a Sei Flamboyant instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted March 30, 2017 Author Share Posted March 30, 2017 [quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1490881234' post='3268753'] I was going to order one, but unfortunately when I enquired, Pagelli had just licensed the design to Marleaux, who never bothered to get in touch with me, so I ended up commissioning a Sei Flamboyant instead. [/quote] Nice alternative! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted March 30, 2017 Author Share Posted March 30, 2017 (edited) I've been fiddling about with angles and distances. My conclusion is that the optimum in terms of angle and bridge position is here: That means that the tuners at the tail just show from the front of the bass where the body sweeps forwards: Above, I've shown the string exit from the back as a wide chamber as in Mick's earlier example. It could just as easily be individual ferrules in the extended fingerboard as with the Golden Bass below: We don't have to decide until much later because the underlying body and neck build will be the same in both cases Edited March 30, 2017 by Andyjr1515 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuNkShUi Posted March 31, 2017 Share Posted March 31, 2017 Love the concept! This is going to be a fascinating build Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted March 31, 2017 Author Share Posted March 31, 2017 [quote name='FuNkShUi' timestamp='1490944059' post='3269165'] Love the concept! This is going to be a fascinating build [/quote] Thanks, Kert I think at the moment I favour ferrules rather than a slot or open chamber (as drawn) for the string exit, but I'm sure it will work just fine either way. I've just ordered the wood for the neck and also for the fretboard - it's a bit narrower than the drawing, so the flare will a touch less than shown, but should be compatible colour-wise. Still LOTS of stuff to work out, but at least fixing the strings in place is sorted...quite an important bit of the jigsaw puzzle! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted April 2, 2017 Author Share Posted April 2, 2017 Neck wood is on order (5 piece - maple/ebony/maple/ebony/maple) as is what I hope to be a nice piece of maple for the extended fretboard. For completeness and comparison, this includes the width of the actual fretboard and also I've put ferrules for the string exit rather than an open chamber (final decision won't be needed until the bass is pretty well carved): The final thing I have to get my head around before I start cutting any wood is the electrics. The ideal is:[list] [*]Undersaddle piezo [*]Hidden magnetic [*]Some form of blend [*]Hidden controls [/list] I've got a number of thoughts about the controls, but blending the piezo and magnetic is still a bit of an unknown and my thoughts on hiding the magnetic pickup is, as yet, unproven... What I am pretty sure is that, whatever, I will need to incorporate a piezo pre-amp. The chamber can be very large area-wise, but it will be very, very slim.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted April 2, 2017 Author Share Posted April 2, 2017 The two piezo / magnetic pre-amp / blend systems that seem to have a good reputation are the Bartolini MPB2-918 and the John East MPM 01 Anyone had any experience with either of these? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted April 2, 2017 Author Share Posted April 2, 2017 Just spotted / remembered that Jez (Jabba_the_Gut) toyed around with piezo and magnetic last year on one of his magnificent builds. I'll drop him a line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoonBassAlpha Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 Are you going with double ball-end strings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted April 2, 2017 Author Share Posted April 2, 2017 [quote name='MoonBassAlpha' timestamp='1491165018' post='3270986'] Are you going with double ball-end strings? [/quote] No - single. The other end is a double clamp system, different to the steinberger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreek Posted April 2, 2017 Share Posted April 2, 2017 For those thinking of a headless system using single ball strings look at these: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/400934036270?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT Uses rollers. Strings go into the brass rollers, ball end goes into the nut end. I have one in another bass, complete unit is heavy - reduce the weight by cutting the body off just in front of the tuner, throw the rest away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul S Posted April 3, 2017 Share Posted April 3, 2017 Question - what is the main objection to using double ball end strings? I find them to be perfectly ok, as is the Steinberger double ball end bridge. Is it simply the lack of choice of strings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted April 3, 2017 Author Share Posted April 3, 2017 [quote name='Paul S' timestamp='1491200602' post='3271080'] Question - what is the main objection to using double ball end strings? I find them to be perfectly ok, as is the Steinberger double ball end bridge. Is it simply the lack of choice of strings? [/quote] Hi, Paul I think Mick does have particular preferences for strings but from my point of view it's all about practicality. I may be feeding the strings though small ferrules on the extended fretboard from the back, and I definitely will be feeding them through small ferrules at the headstock - the clamping will be at the back of a headstock rather than the blunt-ended 'conventional' headless arrangement. The plan (if it works out! ) is to keep the front view as clean and minimalist as possible - no tuners, no knobs - just wood and strings. On the knobs front, I've got a great solution I'm just about to bounce off Mick . I'll post a drawing if he's happy with it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted April 3, 2017 Author Share Posted April 3, 2017 Thumbs up from Mick on the controls thoughts. It's a spin-off from Nic's Mouradian style where we were trying to hide the Smoothound Tx from the front-view: So what I've got in mind is this: Bearing in mind that the body starts at 1.5" and slims down to nothing, I've got the bulky stuff closer to the neck (pots and battery) and the slim stuff closer to the edge (jack socket and preamp/mixer) with simple blend, master tone and jack socket. Might just work! And if space is still tight, some of the better-makes small pots would also be fine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samhay Posted April 3, 2017 Share Posted April 3, 2017 Nice, but no volume control? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted April 3, 2017 Author Share Posted April 3, 2017 [quote name='samhay' timestamp='1491237157' post='3271465'] Nice, but no volume control? [/quote] Maybe... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyjr1515 Posted April 4, 2017 Author Share Posted April 4, 2017 You will have noticed that there have been plenty of drawings and not much sawdust yet You will know that many of my builds are in the 'make it up as I go along' ilk, but frankly this one can't be. Stuff that normally would be 'near enough is good enough' is going to need to be sub-mm accurate. Later today, I will be drawing detailed full-size cross-sections of the body. It's a bit chicken and egg - the actual shape will depend on the hardware and configuration. This is the basic conceptual cross-section: The dark-blue rectangle is the neck wood. The body wood is only 1.5" to start with - and I'm going to scoop a significant amount out of the back! Ideally, I want to scoop 0.5" out, leaving a [i]starting [/i]body depth of only 1" (I think a typical Gibson / Fender is 1.75"?) And then I want to slim it down!!! The practical constraints become, therefore, the depth of the pickup and the depth of the pots and battery. Basically, dimensions A and B in the pick above have got to include the: pots/battery size + top thickness + control chamber cover thickness. So basically I have to work backwards - ie, work out the minimum dimensions A and B can possibly be and then I can work out the maximum depth the scoop can be. And then I need to cut wood to the same accuracy. I can almost smell that sycamore-rich barbecue already Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.