Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Maybe, they both have unique functions.

The VB has pretty decent upright modelling, the synth section is much more comprehensive and the routing and effects sections are more independently controllable.

The GR has PCM tones, the VB does not. The bass to MIDI on the GR is much better.

It's horses for courses really, depends what you need and how you're going to use it.

Edited by NoirBass
Posted

[quote name='NoirBass' timestamp='1495201126' post='3302111']
Maybe, they both have unique functions.

The VB has pretty decent upright modelling, the synth section is much more comprehensive and the routing and effects sections are more independently controllable.

The GR has PCM tones, the VB does not. The bass to MIDI on the GR is much better.

It's horses for courses really, depends what you need and how you're going to use it.
[/quote]

Absolutely this !

I seem to have a better " feel " of the original Vbass

Gary

Posted

I used to have a V-Bass and loved it to bits, and about two years ago I upgraded to the VB99. As Noirbass says it's a really 'routeable' system, in fact it's the hub of my office music/audio/bass system.

I recently bought a GR20 and US20 splitter box to play both at once, I must admit the PCM sounds in the GR20 are great fun.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...