The way we were... in defence of Later (sort of ...)

[Rich]

On 17/05/2018 at 16:47, chris_b said:

I reckon that north of 90% of the acts on Later have not been to my taste.

That doesn't make Later a bad show. Later is a good show because it features live music. Why anyone would want to take it off the air just because they don't like the acts beats me.

What these people should be moaning about is that lack of alternative music shows on TV. With more choice, maybe, people would stop bleating on about Later.

^^THIS.