Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Is reading important


mic mac moe

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, mic mac moe said:

It's a broad subject, this. Reading as a topic covers such a basic grasp as picking up licks, lessons and basic arps and scales from books and magazines all the way up to a full on chick corea score and beyond. For my money, I'm glad that I learned to read, because I'd like to know rather than be ignorant. Can you imagine not bothering learning to reverse in your car? 

TBH honest all those concepts are pretty alien to me including the one about reversing your car (I'm an appalling driver and consequently for mine and the safety of other road users, it's been over 20 years since I last got behind the wheel of a car) 😉

I don't think I've ever played a scale in my life. Sure I know where all the notes are on a keyboard or fretboard, but actually playing scales doesn't hold any musical interest for me. Similarly with "licks" and arpeggios. I see this "building block" approach to playing all the time usually from guitarists when they are "improvising" a solo. It looks impressive the first time you hear it, but by the third solo you realise that all they are doing is rearranging the same musical phrases in slightly different orders and in different keys depending on the underlying chord structure.

When I'm writing I can normally hear what I want to play in my head, so I'm not being bound by patterns my fingers are comfortable with. If I do notice that I am reusing elements from something previous, I'll deliberately go out of my way to break the pattern to come up with something new. I does mean that as I'm writing a new part for whatever instrument I'm playing, it will take me a little longer to get up to speed while I'm searching for the perfect notes and training my fingers to play in patterns they are unaccustomed to. Ultimately I think it results in better songwriting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MacDaddy said:

being able to read/knowing music theory does not stop you being able to play by ear/jam etc.

This is the point, reading and theory are just more tools for the tools box.

If we go back in time to when early man started banging bones together and his mate jumped up and said 'that sounds cool lets jam, you bang the bones and I will bash on this dead mammoth' music was always passed on aurally, then people started writing it down because back then that was the best recording they could get. That developed into the written music system we have today,  but everyone got on fine before that.

Today we have so many ways to communicate music to each other that being able to sight read is far less important than it used to be. Though I think a good understanding of music theory can only be a good thing... but each to their own. But it has definitely improved my playing, both in what I play and how I communicate with other musicians. 

Edited by JBP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MacDaddy said:

being able to read/knowing music theory does not stop you being able to play by ear/jam etc.

It doesn't. But knowing theory, and having the notes under your fingers enables you to play by ear and jam much more effectively.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BigRedX said:

TBH honest all those concepts are pretty alien to me including the one about reversing your car (I'm an appalling driver and consequently for mine and the safety of other road users, it's been over 20 years since I last got behind the wheel of a car) 😉

I don't think I've ever played a scale in my life. Sure I know where all the notes are on a keyboard or fretboard, but actually playing scales doesn't hold any musical interest for me. Similarly with "licks" and arpeggios. I see this "building block" approach to playing all the time usually from guitarists when they are "improvising" a solo. It looks impressive the first time you hear it, but by the third solo you realise that all they are doing is rearranging the same musical phrases in slightly different orders and in different keys depending on the underlying chord structure.

When I'm writing I can normally hear what I want to play in my head, so I'm not being bound by patterns my fingers are comfortable with. If I do notice that I am reusing elements from something previous, I'll deliberately go out of my way to break the pattern to come up with something new. I does mean that as I'm writing a new part for whatever instrument I'm playing, it will take me a little longer to get up to speed while I'm searching for the perfect notes and training my fingers to play in patterns they are unaccustomed to. Ultimately I think it results in better songwriting.

I once played for a songwriter in Canada. His son was the drummer. This guy had a similar philosophy to yours. No scales, no arpeggios(?) theory ppffft. His songs were good though and his guitar playing was excellent. Except, when he tried including stops or stabs at the intervals he had in his head, it all went south. He wouldn't (couldn't) count and for me and the drummer it was a nightmare, bordering on farcical. You need to know the standard in music before you can alter away from it. It's like me fixing a car, never bothered learning about mechanics, but I know how it's meant to run!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mic mac moe said:

I once played for a songwriter in Canada. His son was the drummer. This guy had a similar philosophy to yours. No scales, no arpeggios(?) theory ppffft. His songs were good though and his guitar playing was excellent. Except, when he tried including stops or stabs at the intervals he had in his head, it all went south. He wouldn't (couldn't) count and for me and the drummer it was a nightmare, bordering on farcical. You need to know the standard in music before you can alter away from it. It's like me fixing a car, never bothered learning about mechanics, but I know how it's meant to run!! 

I doubt that's directly related to a lack of theoretical understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Paul S said:

Clearly, as a bassist who has played with Knopfler, Lindisfarne and numerous other elite from the northeast of England, this lack of theory hasn't set you back too much, Michael?  :)

Ha.. I'm fine until I get to a song with stops or stabs. Then it all falls apart (apparently) 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone brought a song to the band. You would play with a certain degree of understanding. The strops etc would be all squared away as standard timing dictates. And if said songwriter starts saying"no, it goes like this", but what he/she is saying doesn't make sense, then that stems from a lack of understanding on their part. If they are wanting a gap that's 13.5/16 notes long because that's what's in their head, then how do you work with that? Well, you try and standardise the gap into the way you understand music to work. Either that or you bend your own brain and that of the majority of your band mates who have also bothered to learn, around the crazy assed gap, written by someone ignorant of the general standard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mic mac moe said:

If they are wanting a gap that's 13.5/16 notes long because that's what's in their head, then how do you work with that? 

The band learn it as the songwriter intends. And if it sounds cack, they persuade him/her to standardise it into something that feels right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, mic mac moe said:

If someone brought a song to the band. You would play with a certain degree of understanding. The strops etc would be all squared away as standard timing dictates. And if said songwriter starts saying"no, it goes like this", but what he/she is saying doesn't make sense, then that stems from a lack of understanding on their part. If they are wanting a gap that's 13.5/16 notes long because that's what's in their head, then how do you work with that? Well, you try and standardise the gap into the way you understand music to work. Either that or you bend your own brain and that of the majority of your band mates who have also bothered to learn, around the crazy assed gap, written by someone ignorant of the general standard

So he wanted you to make a gap 27 32nd notes long and you couldn't count it or feel it consistently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...