EliasMooseblaster Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 The "Excellent Joe Walsh" thread that began a few days ago got me thinking: I can take or leave the Eagles, and given the choice I'd rather put on some of Walsh's solo stuff. But is he a rare beast in this respect? Usually, I feel like the offshoot solo album is a chance for members of a band to try something different, but it's never quite as good or exciting as the stuff they did with the band that made them famous in the first place. Often, they're 45-minute collections of absolute dross which reek either of self-indulgence or cashing in. But once in a while, you come across one which stands head and shoulders above the music they were making with their original band. So who - for you - should have thumbed their nose at their original band years ago and just carried on making solo albums? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad3353 Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, EliasMooseblaster said: ...So who - for you - should have thumbed their nose at their original band years ago and just carried on making solo albums? Well, without going so far as to condone unwarranted 'nose-thumbing', Richard Thompson continued, and continues to continue, delivering high quality stuff since going solo from Fairport Convention, where he excelled. Worth producing stuff under his own name..? Absolutely. I'd also mention the duo Jorma Kaukonen and Jack Casady, both extremely proficient and important artists as Hot Tuna since the end of Jefferson Airplane. Edited November 16, 2018 by Dad3353 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bridgehouse Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 George Michael. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cato Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 (edited) Does Wings count? 'The band the Beatles could have been'. - Alan Partridge. Edited November 16, 2018 by Cato 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bridgehouse Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Cato said: Does Wings count? 'The band the Beatles could have been'. - Alan Partridge. We dodged a bullet there then.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delberthot Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 (edited) Off the top of my head - Billy Idol, Sting, Phil Collins, Eric Clapton & Peter Gabriel. I love their music from the bands they were famous for but associate them more with their solo work Edited November 16, 2018 by Delberthot 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingPrawn Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Julian Cope has done some fine work. None of the Beatles!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scalpy Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Peter Frampton? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skankdelvar Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Not quite solo artists but Annie Lennox and Dave Stewart did better for themselves after they left The Tourists, ditto Paul Young after the Q-Tips. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casapete Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Massive fan of The Faces, but it could be argued that Rod Stewart went on to greater success after they split. Others could be Justin Timberland / NSYNC, Beyoncé / Destiny’s Child, Peter Gabriel / Genesis, Lionel Richie / Commodores. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthurhenry Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Steve Hillage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maude Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Nobody mentioned Michael Jackson yet? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maude Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 And Dave Grohl I suppose. Although I preferred Nirvana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bridgehouse Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 17 minutes ago, Maude said: And Dave Grohl I suppose. Although I preferred Nirvana. Much as he’s most of it, I don’t think the Foos are completely a DG solo act Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maude Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Just now, Bridgehouse said: Much as he’s most of it, I don’t think the Foos are completely a DG solo act Ah yes, I've led myself away from the OP. Although the first album (and best, all downhill for the next twenty years Davey Boy) was all young Master Grohl I seem to remember. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bridgehouse Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Maude said: Ah yes, I've led myself away from the OP. Although the first album (and best, all downhill for the next twenty years Davey Boy) was all young Master Grohl I seem to remember. True - I’ll give you that But there’s some serious talent in the foos that isn’t DG as well! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_b Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Jeff Beck and Rod Stewart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mykesbass Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 George Harrison and John Lennon. Genuine opinion, not courting controversy, honest guv! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_5 Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Björk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scalpy Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 36 minutes ago, paul_5 said: Björk Great call, love Bjork. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_5 Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Arguably Iggy Pop’s made better records as a solo artist than with the Stooges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Frank Turner - Million Dead were good, but he's really become a great songwriter since they split and he decided he didn't want to be in a band. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NancyJohnson Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 On 16/11/2018 at 19:58, skankdelvar said: Not quite solo artists but Annie Lennox and Dave Stewart did better for themselves after they left The Tourists, ditto Paul Young after the Q-Tips. Paul Young, AKA Ol' Wheezy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steantval Posted November 17, 2018 Share Posted November 17, 2018 Eric Clapton Steve Winwood Rory Gallagher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkandrew Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 (edited) Also sometimes works in reverse - some artists have left their band for greater things only to return some years later with their tails between their legs - e.g. Gary Barlow and the other Take That boys kind of fizzled out pretty quickly as solo artists but when they got back together as Take That they arguably had more success than they did originally. The same could probably be said of the Spice Girls - would Geri or Mel C sell out stadiums as solo artists? Probably not. Edited November 18, 2018 by darkandrew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.7e18f76540598a8efc0e6ca9be453059.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.