Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm not normally bothered by aesthetics, but the fact that no two angles (and there's lots of them!) seem to correspond to each other in any kind of order makes it all look a bit.... Random.

I know that the frets are fanned according to a formula and the bridge saddles are correctly placed with the pickups properly angled, but they don't visually correlate to each other or any of the angles in the body shape.

Posted
13 minutes ago, totorbass said:

I think I'd like it better with their usual headstock shape. This looks like a very small headed bird.

Probably for balance... 

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, CameronJ said:

The only thing putting me off a D-bird was the fact it didn’t come in a 5 string...

This is terrible news.

Same here!

Luckily I am sure it will be way too expensive to consider :)

Posted
2 hours ago, totorbass said:

I think I'd like it better with their usual headstock shape. This looks like a very small headed bird.

I think it’s because it would be too long to fit it in a case otherwise. 

2 hours ago, visog said:

Probably for balance... 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Woodinblack said:

Same here!

Luckily I am sure it will be way too expensive to consider :)

True. Best case scenario it’ll come in just under £3k which is hilariously far out of my budget

Posted
29 minutes ago, CameronJ said:

True. Best case scenario it’ll come in just under £3k which is hilariously far out of my budget

Yep - well, maybe both sides - that one is the standard, there is a custom too...

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Woodinblack said:

 

dbird-5-3x-matte-mettallic-gold-wenge-we

 

 

 

I'd have prefered  these kind of proportions (it is shorter too). About balance,  the body might be thicker if a little smaller. As it is, it reminds me too much this ugly little Gibson studio's headstock.

190118095408783790.png

Edited by totorbass
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
5 minutes ago, CameronJ said:

What do you mean by standard?

The standard is made in china and is quite a bit cheaper than the custom (but not currently available in 5 string)

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Woodinblack said:

The standard is made in china and is quite a bit cheaper than the custom (but not currently available in 5 string)

Ah, in that case, I agree wholeheartedly!

Posted

Slightly off topic and I apologise, but has Dingwall ever done a non fan fretted bass? I had 2 Dingwalls (ABZ6 and AB16) and I always thought I'd have loved them if they had been conventionally fretted. 

Back on topic, this looks lovely but still not a Thunderbird fan....... Sorry.

Posted
1 hour ago, mattbass6 said:

Slightly off topic and I apologise, but has Dingwall ever done a non fan fretted bass? I had 2 Dingwalls (ABZ6 and AB16) and I always thought I'd have loved them if they had been conventionally fretted.

Sheldon committed to fanned frets a long time ago as it fits his vision of what his basses should be and there are plenty of parallel fret options. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...