phsycoandy Posted February 1, 2019 Share Posted February 1, 2019 (edited) Lovely pretty much unmarked PJ bass made by Fenix. Serial number dates her to 1981 I believe E104****. Super build quality. There are no dings or scratches just the lightest of play swirls. One of the tuners has a slightly different bass plate, I understand they were using lots of Squier parts much to Fenders annoyance any way who knows. No issues and plays great. Offering Free shipping in the UK. SOLD Edited February 9, 2019 by phsycoandy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skezza Posted February 2, 2019 Share Posted February 2, 2019 where abouts are you ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phsycoandy Posted February 2, 2019 Author Share Posted February 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Skezza said: where abouts are you ? Hi Suffolk. IP31 but i do travel a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassassin Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Very nice, in my experience Fenix are very, very good. I have a Fenix Strat which I find a better player than my E-serial MIJ Squier. This will be early 90s from the headstock shape - Fenix used several, including the Fender style when Young-Chang had the Squier contract. Which was the root of their issues with Fender - basically selling Squiers with their own brand on the headstocks. That does make Fenix a bit "lawsuity", and desirable for some people... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phsycoandy Posted February 3, 2019 Author Share Posted February 3, 2019 thanks for the info, so perhaps 91 then not 81 who knows! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ead Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 I had one of these and it was a very nice bass to play. Unrivalled value for money. Slightly differnt headstock on mine but no idea in what order they were produced (sorry). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooky_lowdown Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 2 hours ago, phsycoandy said: thanks for the info, so perhaps 91 then not 81 who knows! 81 would have been pre squier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phsycoandy Posted February 8, 2019 Author Share Posted February 8, 2019 SOLD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.7e18f76540598a8efc0e6ca9be453059.jpg)
Recommended Posts