Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

It is growing on me the more I see it but something about a headless, 6 string bass that doesn't seem very 'Yamaha' or 'Nathan East' to me 😅

Downfall for me, would be the price tag. His BB is already £3k+... So unless is going to be a ridiculously cheap Japanese bass or something, it's probably something that's a one off. 

 

Hell of a good video though 😉👌🏻 what a guy.

Posted

So fugly. Great player though, obviously. The design and weight don't seem to make much sense to me but hey, I don't have to play it. Guesses on price? £4k I reckon.......

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, mattbass6 said:

........ but hey, I don't have to play it. Guesses on price? £4k I reckon.......

£4k? Which means that most of us don't have to play it either.

Edited by mangotango
making more sense.
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, mattbass6 said:

So fugly. Great player though, obviously. The design and weight don't seem to make much sense to me but hey, I don't have to play it. Guesses on price? £4k I reckon.......

The design and weight make some sense.. my experiences with headless basses (Status Streamline and Hohner B2A) suggest that some mass is desirable in terms of tone (they were obviously too light) 

The original Steinbergers were much heavier and sound better to my ears.

None of the ultra minimalist designs are as good when seated as a regular bass.

Posted
17 hours ago, Dood said:

It's beautiful.

Oh and it's a six string headless.. which is, of course right up my street!

dtwo5.jpg.cdee6e47ddb37fd8d46ce5fda03e54ae.jpg

Yours gets me every time. That in 32” scale and 16mm spacing would rock!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, therealting said:

Yours gets me every time. That in 32” scale and 16mm spacing would rock!

Awwww that'd be pretty nice! This one is 16.5mm spacing and we were careful not to get that ‘thing’ with some headless basses where the end of the neck is a little further away than a standard ‘headed’ bass. So I think you’ll probably find the 34” scale here pretty spot on.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, hypercarrots said:

8CAC8E1D-57A4-4168-BF31-DB5588D79EFB.thumb.jpeg.b66241ee765bd6f4e9139b7d147391e9.jpeg

B0838001-E361-450E-9C84-AF4286F5A29E.thumb.jpeg.bac1be663e85d90bb3c633f87d02d5c6.jpeg

According to that second picture they put Nathan East in a 20 ton press 😮 Bet that made a mess... interesting bass though.

Posted

I think it's pretty cool, personally - also don't think 10lbs (4.5kg) is THAT bad, for a six string. It probably 'wears' really well (for Nathan, at least). Good for him for getting something a bit out of the ordinary. FWIW I think headless basses look much better with a futuristic body style like this. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...