L-mac Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 Hi guys newbie here.........would be interested to hear your opinions on sandberg basses, specifically the California JJ. cheers Quote
EdwardHimself Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 they look very nice, personally i would get the JM for a bit more beef but that's just me. Aparently they're as good as stingrays but £200 cheaper. Quote
Machines Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 Yeah - the JJ's are very nice but i'd opt for the JM instead - unless of course you want it to be more Fender like. Quote
baixo Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 Hi there, I have JM 5 and I love it... the only downside, it's very a heavy bass! I have tried a couple of PM4's which were great also Quote
Bigwan Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 Love sandberg 4 strings, but the 5 strings have a very tight string spacing (the ones I've played anyway). If you likethat they're hard to beat for the money! Quote
bass_ferret Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 Tried one - did not like it. Neck was a bit chunky and on the J/M the M pup completely overpowers the J. Preferred a Lakland Skyline. Quote
wildus Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 [quote name='L-mac' post='38147' date='Jul 28 2007, 02:34 PM']Hi guys newbie here.........would be interested to hear your opinions on sandberg basses, specifically the California JJ. cheers[/quote] Hi,i had the california JJ nice looking bass but the sound was not all that get a used fender or a warwick! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.