Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Apparently these are prototypes and a couple of niggles to be sorted before namm.

Prices will be in and around Skyline Prices.

Think if they do the P in LPB with a matching head, I could be in bother.

Obviously a nod to John Entwistle who was big buddies with Ashdown.

And a short scale Jazz, as well as 34” and 35” 5 string...

 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Merton said:

I’d like a short scale PJ ideally but I suspect Mark won’t go for that too!

The shorty J is certainly of interest :)

Ideally a p/j in LPB 

  • Like 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, Merton said:

I’d like a short scale PJ ideally but I suspect Mark won’t go for that too!

The shorty J is certainly of interest :)

Yes I'd go for short scale P body with PJ pick-ups.

  • Like 3
Posted

Why, oh why do we get just another round of fenders. Sorry to say that I expected something more and novel. Great amps should equal great and original design in basses, too.

  • Like 12
Posted
10 minutes ago, AndyTravis said:

Thing is they tried that with lodestone basses and all the great reviews aside I don’t think they were best sellers.

Surely the Loadstone basses were also Fender copies but with an even more ugly headstock?

Posted
1 minute ago, BigRedX said:

Surely the Loadstone basses were also Fender copies but with an even more ugly headstock?

Well...they were sort of fender shaped...and had EMG j pickups...But they had all funky carves and bevels...

The headstock could’ve been better. I think the lack of shape to the bottom of it was an error of judgement for sure. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Grahambythesea said:

I like the dirtybirds! Pity no 5. ☹️

Agreed, one of these with 18-19mm bridge spacing and a 3/2 headstock would be ideal 👍

Posted
Just now, BreadBin said:

Agreed, one of these with 18-19mm bridge spacing and a 3/2 headstock would be ideal 👍

One of those with a 16.5-17mm bridge spacing and a 3/2 headstock would be better!

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, AndyTravis said:

The headstock could’ve been better. I think the lack of shape to the bottom of it was an error of judgement for sure. 

"Could have been better" is some of the most diplomatic language I can think of when picturing this atrocity!

lodestone-primal-instinct1-850-75.jpg&ke

  • Haha 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Waddycall said:

They look a bit cheap to me. Maybe it’s the pickguard, colours or matching headstocks.

The colours all look dark and a bit desaturated, I think the issue is with the photo's colour balance, is this better?

image.png.c0e998b8090a32ffb59cd2a4db052d48.png

  • Like 1
Posted

Had a moment of anticipation - just a fleeting moment - and as the mental impulse to click the link was translated into physical action, I thought: They'll just be Fender knockoffs.

Well, whoop-de-bleedin' doo. 9_9

Posted

Yep. That’s a “meh” from me. Shame, as Lakin’s MM + J design was fantastic, now he’s just redesigning the designed. Aside from the unusual string tree position (and I’m just curious wtf they were thinking) there is nothing of interest here for me.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...