Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

New year, new build


Rexel Matador

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Andyjr1515 said:

Likewise.  Resistance does affect the volume, though.  6.8 ohms sounds very respectable for a home wound :)

You will, in any event, need to allow the pickup to sit as high in the cover as you can because the wood thickness, although sonically invisible, nevertheless still forms part of the string to pole gap.  In one of the covers I did, I had to scoop more out of the insides to be able to raise the pup a touch more to prevent the top of the cover being too close to the string.

I was a little concerned about that, but it's pretty thin so hopefully it'll be ok - scooping is always an option of it comes to it!

My first attempt had holes with the pole pieces poking through, like a normal J pickup, but it was very delicate and I ended up breaking it and didn't want to risk it happening again 😆

Edited by Rexel Matador
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rexel Matador said:

My first attempt had holes with the pole pieces poking through, like a normal J pickup, but it was very delicate and I ended up breaking it and didn't want to risk it happening again 😆

Yes, I opted not to have the pole pieces coming through too. ;) Too scary.

If the top is thin, you should be fine and, as I say, 6.8 ohms is in 'respectable' territory.

I'm really impressed with what you are doing with this project...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Andyjr1515 said:

Yes, I opted not to have the pole pieces coming through too. ;) Too scary.

If the top is thin, you should be fine and, as I say, 6.8 ohms is in 'respectable' territory.

I'm really impressed with what you are doing with this project...

Thanks! So far so good...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to regret the offset body shape because I'm really itching to go multiscale - it would be great for the absurdly low bottom string in the new metal band - but don't want to have one of the little bridges practically hanging off the back. Oh well, I guess that just means I'll have to build another one 😀

Apologies that this update is just a general musing as opposed to evidence of some actual work! More pictures soon, I swear.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rexel Matador said:

I'm starting to regret the offset body shape because I'm really itching to go multiscale - it would be great for the absurdly low bottom string in the new metal band - but don't want to have one of the little bridges practically hanging off the back. Oh well, I guess that just means I'll have to build another one 😀

Apologies that this update is just a general musing as opposed to evidence of some actual work! More pictures soon, I swear.

Worth drawing it out full-size and seeing where things would end up.  Based on where your bridge is drawn at the moment, can't see why it wouldn't be possible - and you don't have to go crazy skewed to give a tangible advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This bass is only going to have one control knob. I bought a maple one as I figured it would look nice with the pickups, but it's really small and would just look weird and sad sitting there on it's own.

So I decided to make one:

20200114_194013.thumb.jpg.200f2f4086c66db75992bf44125fb4b1.jpg 20200114_194024.thumb.jpg.1c1960da30c6146a85ad55b87a061efc.jpg

It's not finished yet, so will be a bit shinier, but I think it'll go nicely with the pickup covers.

I've also done a bit more on the body but there's nothing to see yet. The top and back are waiting for me at the post office, so I'll make some real progress soon. I haven't even started on the neck, but I've got some fun time-consuming plans for that too 😆

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top in place. It's looking a bit rough right now but I can already tell it'll look lovely once it's finished. Progress has very slow, so, even though there's loads left to do, it's nice to see it beginning to look like an actual bass body. I still have to cut the soundholes before the back goes on. I probably should have done it before gluing it on but I still haven't decided exactly what they should look like.

20200122_185406.thumb.jpg.e9e467d22f48b54ec8a1a1c37b654fd8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DanOwens said:

2 looks more metal! 

I agree - kind of Giger-ish! Admittedly F-holes are not the most metal thing to add to a bass, but I figure Lemmy's had a nice carved walnut body and what's more metal than Lemmy? Even if he did play strictly "Rock n' Roll".

Edited by Rexel Matador
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming along. The offset body necessitated asymmetrical f-holes and I need to do a fair old bit of shaping to get them looking right. I pretty much messed up by not setting the lower one a bit further back towards the bridge end, but it comes pretty much up to where the control cavity starts so we're stuck with it. I'm not massively happy with them, but I'm not taking the top off and starting again, so I'll work with what I've got and get them looking as nice as I can

20200125_110433.thumb.jpg.53fb92d5f7ab7899290f7631683b9359.jpg

But the grain on this top is better than I could have hoped for. It almost feels like a shame to add pickups and a bridge and that

Edited by Rexel Matador
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the encouragement so far everyone. It always spurs me on!

String/bridge question: the band I'm currently playing with tunes to drop B flat (I had no say in this - it was locked in before I joined - but here we are 🤣) so from low to high, Bb, F, Bb, Eb. So - this means that my "B" string is a semitone lower than standard and the other three are a semitone higher than standard. Consequently an off the peg Beefy Slinky set gives me very uneven string tension and I'm going to experiment with a custom set, including a ridiculous .140 B string. Come on, get to the point... ok... should I be filing the slot in the saddle to accommodate it because otherwise it will be connecting with the saddle in two places (the sides of the slot, rather than sitting in it). Some saddles have v shaped slots and some are threaded, so maybe it doesn't matter. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rexel Matador said:

should I be filing the slot in the saddle to accommodate it because otherwise it will be connecting with the saddle in two places (the sides of the slot, rather than sitting in it). Some saddles have v shaped slots and some are threaded, so maybe it doesn't matter. Thoughts?

I generally would, simply because then the bottom of the slot is going to be the nut height so you can be sure where it's going to be regardless of the string.  Having said that, for a tryout for a string gauge that you might not stick with, initially I would probably leave the slot alone unless it was sitting so high that you can't judge if it's a keeper or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Andyjr1515 said:

I generally would, simply because then the bottom of the slot is going to be the nut height so you can be sure where it's going to be regardless of the string.  Having said that, for a tryout for a string gauge that you might not stick with, initially I would probably leave the slot alone unless it was sitting so high that you can't judge if it's a keeper or not.

Many thanks Andy, that's a great idea 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...