Mr. Foxen Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 Did it have some advantage like better treble dispersion, or was it just how to fit speakers in a different sized box? Quote
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 [quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='428668' date='Mar 8 2009, 12:29 PM']Did it have some advantage like better treble dispersion, or was it just how to fit speakers in a different sized box?[/quote]Most likely too much weed. California in the '70s, dude. Fender cabs were never shining examples of how to build bass cabs, more often than not being the opposite. This oddity represents their nadir. Quote
Mr. Foxen Posted March 8, 2009 Author Posted March 8, 2009 I'm guessing due to the small sealed enclosure, this will sound like a bassy guitar cab? Quote
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 [quote name='joegarcia' post='428689' date='Mar 8 2009, 12:54 PM']What exactly is wrong with them then?[/quote] Guitar drivers loaded in a cab of half the volume required shoddily built from inferior materials. But otherwise OK. Quote
silverfoxnik Posted March 8, 2009 Posted March 8, 2009 [quote name='Bill Fitzmaurice' post='428788' date='Mar 8 2009, 07:09 PM']Guitar drivers loaded in a cab of half the volume required shoddily built from inferior materials. But otherwise OK. [/quote] It looks pretty stupid as well! Quote
skankdelvar Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 [quote name='silverfoxnik' post='428800' date='Mar 8 2009, 07:39 PM']It looks pretty stupid as well![/quote] I dunno - there's a certain retro charm... Quote
xgsjx Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 It looks like you flip a few fasteners, pull a couple of sides & it turns into a 9x8 cab! Quote
alexclaber Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 The cross-firing and upwards firing woofers would improve dispersion but the downwards facing woofer is a v bad idea and the internal volume is hopelessly compromised. Could work ok as a guitar 3x10" though. Alex Quote
crez5150 Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 [quote name='alexclaber' post='429051' date='Mar 9 2009, 08:34 AM']The cross-firing and upwards firing woofers would improve dispersion but the downwards facing woofer is a v bad idea and the internal volume is hopelessly compromised. Could work ok as a guitar 3x10" though. Alex[/quote] Didn't Trace Elliot do 3 x 10 version of this Idea? Quote
gilmour Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 [quote name='crez5150' post='429057' date='Mar 9 2009, 08:46 AM']Didn't Trace Elliot do 3 x 10 version of this Idea?[/quote] I was thinking that - without the top speaker, but can't find a pic Quote
Musky Posted March 9, 2009 Posted March 9, 2009 [quote name='gilmour' post='429095' date='Mar 9 2009, 09:44 AM']I was thinking that - without the top speaker, but can't find a pic [/quote] That was the first thing I thought of when I opened the thread as well. It was produced with the trident head, so I assume it was called the trident as well. [attachment=21726:trace_el...triangle.jpg] Quote
Mr. Foxen Posted March 9, 2009 Author Posted March 9, 2009 [quote name='alexclaber' post='429051' date='Mar 9 2009, 08:34 AM']The cross-firing and upwards firing woofers would improve dispersion but the downwards facing woofer is a v bad idea and the internal volume is hopelessly compromised. Could work ok as a guitar 3x10" though. Alex[/quote] So would it actually work 'better' with the top speaker hole plugged? I'd guess the sound bouncing off the floor would comprimise the rest or something. Or would it just be a waste of one speaker to leave it there as it has little to conribute? Anyway, bit invalid now as I got outbid. Still determined to get some sort of weird looking cab for my mids and highs. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.