Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Sadowsky MetroExpress - new line impressions


danbanbass

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Sibob said:

Nothing to do with Sadowsky from what I can quickly ascertain from Google, 'Roger' basses appear to be "...guitars & basses were made in Germany by Wenzel Rossmeisl, who named his instrument line after his son Roger..."

Si

I think it's actually by Ray Rogers, R Basses.
Here's another one, quite different though >> https://reverb.com/item/563441-ray-rogers-r-bass-5-string-zebra-over-alder-w-lane-poor-pickups

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Warwick can get anywhere close to the business plan they will be producing very high quality basses at a very reasonable price. These have the potential to be very good value for money. . . . . and all you lot can whitter on about is the logo?!?

Apparently Warwick sends someone over to the Chinese factory every couple of weeks to keep an eye on production and QC, but since Covid-19 haven't been able to. This might be having a knock on effect in the QC dept.

Personally I'd rather not be supporting China's economic world domination, so I'll be sticking with my Japanese Metro.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chris_b said:

If Warwick can get anywhere close to the business plan they will be producing very high quality basses at a very reasonable price. These have the potential to be very good value for money. . . . . and all you lot can whitter on about is the logo?!?

This is nothing that Lakland, Musicman, and Dingwall haven't managed already in the Far East.

Sadowsky do however seem to have cosmetically at least, undermined the brand by making it the logo look like it was ink stamped on from a children's art kit from The Works for £3.99.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to agree with @Machines on this one. Brand identity is everything, and a logo is a huge part of that. 

Not many people here are suspecting the basses themselves will be poor.

There are a ton of people who are put off Sire basses - in spite of their generally positive reputation - because of the look of the headstock.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I quite like the general sound of the bass but as others have said the hiss and gain control needs sorting. Other than that it's probably a good bass for the price. I'd need to play one to confirm that though. 😁

The logo isn't the worst I've seen but could be better. I wonder what the actual legal standpoint is of building the bass in China and then finishing it off (eg: add the original logo) in another country where you can use the trademark? After all the bass came in a Sadowsky branded gig bag and branded box? 🤔

Edited by Acebassmusic
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CookPassBabtridge said:

The overall tone is actually pretty nice. Biggest concern is those noisy electronics - hopefully that was an isolated QC issue but who knows! 

I would agree. Honestly, though, that bass should not pass QC with noise levels like that. Hopefully it is an isolated incident. However, if the Metro Express basses are generally noisy, then that is a real shame as 'noisy electronics' really are the antithesis of what Roger Sadowsky built his reputation on. 

Also, I think I will have to check out the Lobster guy's other reviews. It is actually nice to hear an actual review rather than a glorified sponsored advert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, jezzaboy said:

To be fair Lobster is getting another bass in as a replacement and I think Roger S was saying that it was hard to get people over there to get a handle on the qc due to covid. 

Lobsters reviews are quite entertaining...

At least it has been sorted out. I think I would been sending the bass back with that kind of noise and hiss.

Edited by thodrik
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It worries me that QC might slip just because ‘the cat’s away’. If that is the case, I wouldn’t feel confident buying one, just in case you ended up with one of the under the radar ones. I’m aware of the supposition and equivocation in this post, but it’s hardly a great start for Warwick, especially as these basses aren’t dirt cheap.

Edited by ezbass
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Roger is noting that people don't like the headstock logo and will do something about it.

Warwick also have form for this - people hated the huge Rockbass headstock logo when they first used it, and it's now been relegated to the truss rod cover. G&L did the same with their Tribute instruments, replacing the ugly, single-colour Tribute logo with the proper G&L one. 

It wouldn't be half as bad if the Metro Express logo actually lined up with the line of the bottom of the headstock!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thodrik said:

I would agree. Honestly, though, that bass should not pass QC with noise levels like that. Hopefully it is an isolated incident. However, if the Metro Express basses are generally noisy, then that is a real shame as 'noisy electronics' really are the antithesis of what Roger Sadowsky built his reputation on. 

Also, I think I will have to check out the Lobster guy's other reviews. It is actually nice to hear an actual review rather than a glorified sponsored advert.

Yeah it would definitely put me off. Assuming it’s a QC issue, surely it’s such an obvious fault it should have been picked up when tested in the factory as you say. Which begs the question as to how many more might slip the net owing to questionable QC.

9 hours ago, Acebassmusic said:

The logo isn't the worst I've seen but could be better. I wonder what the actual legal standpoint is of building the bass in China and then finishing it off (eg: add the original logo) in another country where you can use the trademark? After all the bass came in a Sadowsky branded gig bag and branded box? 🤔

This is a really good point, it would make sense to just put the ‘proper’ logo on the headstock when they ship out of China. Though perhaps it would increase production costs too much for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ezbass said:

It worries me that QC might slip just because ‘the cat’s away’. If that is the case, I wouldn’t feel confident buying one, just in case you ended up with one of the under the radar ones. I’m aware of the supposition and equivocation in this post, but it’s hardly a great start for Warwick, especially as these basses aren’t dirt cheap.

Agree 100%. There’s no excuse these days with the likes of Sandberg Electra, MTD Kingston, Xotic ProVintage, Dingwall Combustion/NG all coming out of Far Eastern factories without any of these issues. Not to mention more affordable brands such as the likes of Ibanez and Cort, who consistently churn out astonishingly good instruments for the money. 

Granted, Sandbergs and Dingwall Combustions/NGs are sent back to their German/Canadian shops for final setup and inspection. One would think Roger Sadowsky might go down the same route considering how synonymous his brand is with quality. This becomes especially true if he’s unable to visit the factory in person at present! Instead we have a product which might do more harm to the brand than good if there are indeed several early run instruments with QC issues. If one YouTube reviewer has managed to get a dodgy one you can bet there are others out there, ready to be snapped up by other unsuspecting players of the Lemon Lottery.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading my posts back it potentially looks like I have an axe to grind with Sadowsky - I really don’t. I haven’t ever owned one of their basses but definitely would in future, most likely a Japanese MetroExpress! It just seems like they’ve seriously missed the ball here. Granted, COVID hasn’t made things easy for anyone but one would think that would be all the more reason to be meticulous before releasing a new product to market.

In Roger Sadowsky’s partial defence, he’s been active on Talkbass and seems to be taking measures to adjust and improve these basses. For example, below is a photo of the control cavity, taken by LowEndLobster:

15DA16FE-B03D-4ADC-9968-8858692997B2.thumb.jpeg.2d9aeed509c1bad3256abf8c8ff23cfe.jpeg

Bit of a bird’s nest. One of the components appears to not even be fastened down (3M adhesive on the back) and look at that battery. but Roger has implemented some changes already so the cavities will now look more like this going forward:

B7FFD8B8-7438-4514-8D92-1050287D24AF.thumb.jpeg.eb86b2c7ea43b6d95dd2a481e293435a.jpeg
 

Much neater. And the battery doesn’t look quite as crusty as before.

Also, the Vintage Tone Control unit will soon be available separately as an upgrade part, along with a humcancelling J pickup. Nice that these will become available but the VTC should have been a standard feature in my opinion, especially on a bass with a boost only preamp! Seem a bit mental not to have any means of rolling off treble whatsoever as standard a tone control costs bloody pennies!

This way, people will have to spend additional money on upgrade parts, plus they’ll have to find their own luthier to do the installation. A sub-£1k bass can tip over the £1k Mark at the end of all this.

Can anyone tell I won’t be buying one of these??

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...