Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Vintage Fenders


Reggaebass

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Beedster said:

Unattractive relic to my eye, lots of battering round the edges rather than player wear 

I agree. I don't mind how much playing wear a bass has, but when it looks like careless neglect/abuse, I'm turned off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sparky Mark said:

I agree. I don't mind how much playing wear a bass has, but when it looks like careless neglect/abuse, I'm turned off.

Yeah same here, i quite like some play wear, but if it has dents and gouges I steer clear , especially on the neck or fretboard 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sparky Mark said:

I agree. I don't mind how much playing wear a bass has, but when it looks like careless neglect/abuse, I'm turned off.


While fiddling with a recoding device, I once placed a glass of wine on my 1966 Fender and the glass (or more likely the detergent) caused a ring stain on the finish of the bass.

 

Sometimes you just couldn’t explain these things to people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Burns-bass said:


While fiddling with a recoding device, I once placed a glass of wine on my 1966 Fender and the glass (or more likely the detergent) caused a ring stain on the finish of the bass.

 

Sometimes you just couldn’t explain these things to people. 

2 hours ago, Sparky Mark said:

I agree. I don't mind how much playing wear a bass has, but when it looks like careless neglect/abuse, I'm turned off.

 

32 minutes ago, Reggaebass said:

Yeah same here, i quite like some play wear, but if it has dents and gouges I steer clear , especially on the neck or fretboard 

 

That one kinda looked like it had been dragged around by the headstock for most of its life :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Burns-bass said:


While fiddling with a recoding device, I once placed a glass of wine on my 1966 Fender and the glass (or more likely the detergent) caused a ring stain on the finish of the bass.

 

Sometimes you just couldn’t explain these things to people. 

I think you've explained that perfectly. Definitely qualifies as neglect/abuse. xD

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Interesting that BD seem to have fallen into the same trap that I did. They state the neck is dated the 5th of the month, where we now know the 5 denotes a Precision neck. 

 

I understand my ignorance but would have thought a specialist would be better informed. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Pow_22 said:

I did see that and it looks pretty cool, if I was closer I’d have a look, ii did notice the frets and it says it’s been re fretted, are they worn or just need a re dress 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Steve Browning said:

Interesting that BD seem to have fallen into the same trap that I did. They state the neck is dated the 5th of the month, where we now know the 5 denotes a Precision neck. 

 

I understand my ignorance but would have thought a specialist would be better informed. 

Now I am confused. My 66 dot/bound/lollipop Jazz is (from my reading of the numbers) Jan 5 1966. So "5=Precision" is now confusing me. I am open to the concept that I have misremembered this number, but I do not think I have. I guess I will have to pop the neck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Owen said:

Now I am confused. My 66 dot/bound/lollipop Jazz is (from my reading of the numbers) Jan 5 1966. So "5=Precision" is now confusing me. I am open to the concept that I have misremembered this number, but I do not think I have. I guess I will have to pop the neck off.

I think that the 5 for Precision is only on the coded necks, a series of digits. The 60's necks with this date is a proper date and not coded

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reggaebass said:

I did see that and it looks pretty cool, if I was closer I’d have a look, ii did notice the frets and it says it’s been re fretted, are they worn or just need a re dress 


They say it’s been refretted. It looks  a bad job. One of the reasons the vintage basses are so playable is the pencil thin frets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, briansbrew said:

I think that the 5 for Precision is only on the coded necks, a series of digits. The 60's necks with this date is a proper date and not coded

Phew. I guess I will still have to take the neck off and look. It has been a long time since I did that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, briansbrew said:

I think that the 5 for Precision is only on the coded necks, a series of digits. The 60's necks with this date is a proper date and not coded

This will be news to me if it’s the case. I understood it to be the product code, otherwise there would be a lot of basses made on the 5th and 7th of the month but no other dates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, andytoad said:

Shame it's a 'C' neck which I don't think I'd get on with or I'd 'ave it!

I’m not too bad on a C neck, my AV62 P has one but I definitely find the B width more comfortable, which always gives me a dilemma when a nice 60s one comes up for sale, I think it’s because I’ve played jazzes for years 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...