Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Cover version beats the original!


Al Krow

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Nicko said:

 

I used to play this in a covers band - closer to this version than the Bob Seger version.

Great tune - I'm not sure that the Metallica version is better than the original, but they're both great. 

I used to be in a band that did a version of this - completely different to either Bob or Metallica's versions. 

Edited by peteb
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

For me, this is the benchmark on Dylan's Don't Think Twice, It's Alright... and Josh Cunningham's guitar solo is a right ripper. I remember when this album, this came out, I reached for the guitar to transcribe his solo. If you have never heard of the Waifs, go check them out. No nonsense pure musicianship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Atomic Kitten went to #1 in the UK in 2002 with their cover of the "Tide is high".

But most of us would agree that the original by Blondie in 1980, which topped the charts in both the USA and UK was better, right?

 

Well yes and no  - the Blondie version was defo better. But it was also a cover which I'll have to fess, as a teenager a little bit smitten with Debbie Harry, I certainly hadn't spotted, haha! 

 

Blondie's cover certainly trounces the 1967 original by the Paragons. But all credit to the Paragons for writing such a catchy tune that was still topping the charts 35 years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mudpup said:

We’ve just introduced this version of the New Order song into our set and it’s going down a storm at the gigs so far….

 

 

 

I've always really liked the original, but that version is an absolute belter. I bet the live energy is fantastic. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Al Krow said:

Atomic Kitten went to #1 in the UK in 2002 with their cover of the "Tide is high".

But most of us would agree that the original by Blondie in 1980, which topped the charts in both the USA and UK was better, right?

 

Well yes and no  - the Blondie version was defo better. But it was also a cover which I'll have to fess, as a teenager a little bit smitten with Debbie Harry, I certainly hadn't spotted, haha! 

 

Blondie's cover certainly trounces the 1967 original by the Paragons. But all credit to the Paragons for writing such a catchy tune that was still topping the charts 35 years later.

 

Blondie have a knack for making cover versions their own.

 

Their cover of The Nerves' "Hanging on the Telephone" makes the original sound like a very poor demo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Rich said:

 

I've always really liked the original, but that version is an absolute belter. I bet the live energy is fantastic. 

 

Yep you can really kick the chorus up a gear live - and I'm amazed how many people know the words. I thought it would be a bit left of centre for our typical crowd....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BigRedX said:

 

Blondie have a knack for making cover versions their own.

 

Their cover of The Nerves' "Hanging on the Telephone" makes the original sound like a very poor demo.

That's a great observation. I'd never really considered Blondie to be an outstanding covers band, but they absolutely were!

Edited by Al Krow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BigRedX said:

 

Blondie have a knack for making cover versions their own.

 

Their cover of The Nerves' "Hanging on the Telephone" makes the original sound like a very poor demo.

 

I prefer the cover by 90s Polish band Hey...

 

 

...but then I would. What a voice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Similarly, I was always going to prefer the Jesus And Mary Chain cover of Who Do You Love?

 

 

to Bo Diddly's original.

 

(The JAMC very graciously wrote a song entitled Bo Diddly Is Jesus. It's not their best.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Al Krow said:

The amusing thing about Mike Flowers' cover is, given it's retro take on the track, a lot of people assumed it was the original! 

Does not surprise me. The cover is really good and "Lou Reed, when asked at the time whether he had heard anything by Oasis, claimed: "Not that I would know. Oh, Wonderwall? The one I know is the Mike Flowers one. That is one of the funniest things I've ever heard in my life."[wiki]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Al Krow said:

The amusing thing about Mike Flowers' cover is, given it's retro take on the track, a lot of people assumed it was the original! 

I have to admit I was one of those people. I’d not really payed much attention to music in the early 90s, heard the MF version first then thought Oasis  (who I had no idea who they were) had done a pretty good modern version of it.

 

But I still think Mike Flowers version is the best. And I really like Oasis.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Lozz196 said:

I have to admit I was one of those people. I’d not really payed much attention to music in the early 90s, heard the MF version first then thought Oasis  (who I had no idea who they were) had done a pretty good modern version of it.

 

But I still think Mike Flowers version is the best. And I really like Oasis.

Very honest of you Lozz to admit that! And I suspect you weren't the only one on here to do so! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lozz196 said:

I have to admit I was one of those people. I’d not really payed much attention to music in the early 90s, heard the MF version first then thought Oasis  (who I had no idea who they were) had done a pretty good modern version of it.

 

But I still think Mike Flowers version is the best. And I really like Oasis.

In my old function band we used to do the Mike Flowers version, often at weddings when it was  a great ice breaker - the older guests 

probably thought it was some sort of obscure 60's lounge tune, and the younger people got it straight away. Went down great!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...