Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

MarkBass SD1200


dave_bass5
 Share

Recommended Posts

Im not sure i saw this in the new MB products press release but its now on their website.
I know it probably wont deliver exactly 1200watss but its still going to be one loud head.

I just wonder who would have a need for it.

[url="http://www.markbass.it/products.php?lingua=en&cat=1&vedi=100"]MarkBass SD 1200[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll only be about 4dB louder than an LMII. Note that 10dB louder is twice as loud so it's like going from a car that can cruise at 60mph to one that can cruise at ~80mph. To continue the analogy if the rest of your band and your typical gig requires you cruise at 70mph then you might like the improvement but if 50mph is all you need then there's no point.

It will take a fairly substantial cab to handle that extra power though - would be nice with the Big One for instance - but most 4x10"s couldn't take advantage of the extra power. So if your current cab is limiting your loudness then a bigger amp won't help.

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='alexclaber' post='440147' date='Mar 20 2009, 11:44 AM']It'll only be about 4dB louder than an LMII. Note that 10dB louder is twice as loud so it's like going from a car that can cruise at 60mph to one that can cruise at ~80mph. To continue the analogy if the rest of your band and your typical gig requires you cruise at 70mph then you might like the improvement but if 50mph is all you need then there's no point.[/quote]

Alex, you crack me up! :) :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='stevie' post='440154' date='Mar 20 2009, 11:49 AM']Alex, you crack me up! :) :rolleyes:[/quote]

LOL, like a Bee to Honey. And no offence meant.

Im not thinking of getting one of these as when i tried the SD800 out last year i didnt quite like the tone compared to my SA450 and LMII.
I did find the SD800 had a bit more headroom though, certainly on the lower notes. Also it seemed to have a quicker response but not quite as warm.
Also i dont need the extra volume although i am thinking of getting a LMIII800, maybe, mainly for the extra headroom i hope it will have and alos the minor updates.

I was just wondering who would use/need one. I guess it cant hurt to have a louder amp, you dont have to run it flat out, but then why get something that costs this much if you dont have a need for it.

Just having a slow day today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dave_bass5' post='440175' date='Mar 20 2009, 12:02 PM']Im not thinking of getting one of these as when i tried the SD800 out last year i didnt quite like the tone compared to my SA450 and LMII.
I did find the SD800 had a bit more headroom though, certainly on the lower notes. Also it seemed to have a quicker response but not quite as warm.
Also i dont need the extra volume although i am thinking of getting a LMIII800, maybe, mainly for the extra headroom i hope it will have and alos the minor updates.[/quote]

The LMIII800 has the same power amp as the SD800 and as the preamps are near identical that's where the difference in tone lies. The extra headroom will be pointless, your cab can't do anything with that power.

There, saved you ££££££! :)

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='alexclaber' post='440179' date='Mar 20 2009, 12:05 PM']The LMIII800 has the same power amp as the SD800 and as the preamps are near identical that's where the difference in tone lies. The extra headroom will be pointless, your cab can't do anything with that power.

There, saved you ££££££! :)

Alex[/quote]

Thanks Alex but you'll need to work a bit harder to save me "wasting" my money ;-).

Im not after more volume as such but more breathing space for the notes, especially the lower ones if that makes any sense.

But, if your right about the power section being the same as the SD800 then i might not bother and just go for a LMIII instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dave_bass5' post='440205' date='Mar 20 2009, 12:27 PM']Im not after more volume as such but more breathing space for the notes, especially the lower ones if that makes any sense.[/quote]

My gut feeling is that would be trying to get something out that your cabs don't want to give.

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pfff, 1200 watts.

try one of [url="http://www.bugera-amps.com/EN/products/BTX36000.aspx"]these[/url] if you really want to...err...win? honestly, I can't figure out what the point of that is unless you have about 5 or 6 8x10's. Still, like I said in another thread, I bet it will be very popular in America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='escholl' post='440571' date='Mar 20 2009, 07:23 PM']pfff, 1200 watts.

try one of [url="http://www.bugera-amps.com/EN/products/BTX36000.aspx"]these[/url] if you really want to...err...win? honestly, I can't figure out what the point of that is unless you have about 5 or 6 8x10's. Still, like I said in another thread, I bet it will be very popular in America.[/quote]


I've been very impressed with Powersoft Amplifiers. I sold my 1u unit recently. I'm raising the 'ridiculous output power' bar with a big grin.

[url="http://pro-audio.powersoft.it/product_list.php?id_menu=271&obj=121"]http://pro-audio.powersoft.it/product_list...271&obj=121[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[url="http://www.bugera-amps.com/EN/products/BVP5500.aspx"]http://www.bugera-amps.com/EN/products/BVP5500.aspx[/url]

Am I wrong or is it a SVT3PRO copy? (Just to be clear: I like copies :D ).
It's got nearly the same layout as well, plus the valve preamp (4 valves, which look substantial anyway, looks interesting, actually a "true" valve preamp, if it's properly made, that is :rolleyes: ), a 500W poweramp...

So it's going to be uselessly quiet as well? :)

*ducks*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dood' post='441083' date='Mar 21 2009, 02:08 PM']I've been very impressed with Powersoft Amplifiers. I sold my 1u unit recently. I'm raising the 'ridiculous output power' bar with a big grin.

[url="http://pro-audio.powersoft.it/product_list.php?id_menu=271&obj=121"]http://pro-audio.powersoft.it/product_list...271&obj=121[/url]

[/quote]

Surely those are designed for sound reinforcement applications, and not individual instrument amplifiers? Still, if you ever feel the need to run about 25 4x10 cabs, and finally let the guitarists know what it feels like to always be drowned out, that'll be your amp. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='alexclaber' post='440179' date='Mar 20 2009, 12:05 PM']The LMIII800 has the same power amp as the SD800 and as the preamps are near identical that's where the difference in tone lies. The extra headroom will be pointless, your cab can't do anything with that power.

There, saved you ££££££! :)

Alex[/quote]Says he, with a 3000 watt amp. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

[quote name='escholl' post='441633' date='Mar 22 2009, 01:16 PM']Surely those are designed for sound reinforcement applications, and not individual instrument amplifiers? Still, if you ever feel the need to run about 25 4x10 cabs, and finally let the guitarists know what it feels like to always be drowned out, that'll be your amp. ^_^[/quote]


Yep, they make fantastic PA amplifiers, especially as you can rack them up in a reasonably small space. My Powersoft was a mere 1Kw per side.. and I did notice the benefit of having so much headroom available, especially as I use low tunings that need more power to be heard cleanly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Musicman20' post='441990' date='Mar 22 2009, 09:18 PM']Who seriously needs 1200 Watts?!

200-300 tube watts is where its at :)[/quote]
or 1000 valve watts ;p

[url="http://www.chambonino.com/construct/const13.html"]http://www.chambonino.com/construct/const13.html[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='umph' post='463047' date='Apr 15 2009, 02:58 PM']or 1000 valve watts ;p

[url="http://www.chambonino.com/construct/const13.html"]http://www.chambonino.com/construct/const13.html[/url][/quote]

it seems like it would have been easier and more practical to use one of [url="http://www.cpii.com/docs/datasheets/78/3CX1000A7-8283.pdf"]these[/url], or something similar. of course, i use the word "practical" loosely. but if you're going to make something completely impractical, you might as well do it in style, right?


i also like how he goes on about regulated high voltage supplies like that wasn't something which was conceived and developed years ago.



still cool idea, i suppose. in theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...