Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Make your own mind up...


Recommended Posts

i like the body.  it's a bit different without being needlessly edgy. 

the fake headstock is awful though.  according to the eBay description they make them with normal headless necks as well, and i can't imagine why someone wouldn't go with that option - maybe if they like the rest of it but really hate the headless look...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/07/2021 at 22:49, Hellzero said:

It's not more ugly than a Fender, but it's way more ergonomic and versatile. Try one and you'll understand. 😉

I'm rather tempted by a doubleneck, but I'm put off by their description of the neck profile as "round D" which seems to mean fat Fender, or possibly fat Warwick, and it's a lot to pay to find that it's not you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/07/2021 at 15:06, prowla said:

What is the point of a bass with headless tuners and a headstock?

I think it's either for the look like @Dad3353 suggested, a bendwell type function like a Status Kingbass:

vzke3izxun5jc0rmdjew.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Or maybe it's to have the feel or hang-ability of a headed neck, while keeping most of the weight at the bridge end... there's probably other reasons I can't think of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...