Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

i like the body.  it's a bit different without being needlessly edgy. 

the fake headstock is awful though.  according to the eBay description they make them with normal headless necks as well, and i can't imagine why someone wouldn't go with that option - maybe if they like the rest of it but really hate the headless look...

Posted
10 hours ago, Hellzero said:

It's not more ugly than a Fender, but it's way more ergonomic and versatile. Try one and you'll understand. 😉

I think I'll pass on that.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 16/07/2021 at 22:49, Hellzero said:

It's not more ugly than a Fender, but it's way more ergonomic and versatile. Try one and you'll understand. 😉

I'm rather tempted by a doubleneck, but I'm put off by their description of the neck profile as "round D" which seems to mean fat Fender, or possibly fat Warwick, and it's a lot to pay to find that it's not you want.

Posted
On 07/07/2021 at 15:06, prowla said:

What is the point of a bass with headless tuners and a headstock?

I think it's either for the look like @Dad3353 suggested, a bendwell type function like a Status Kingbass:

vzke3izxun5jc0rmdjew.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Or maybe it's to have the feel or hang-ability of a headed neck, while keeping most of the weight at the bridge end... there's probably other reasons I can't think of.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...