lurksalot Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 On 27/08/2021 at 09:22, BillyBass said: reckon this will start an avalanche of law suits of similarly abused individuals by exploitive bands That’ll be Ronnie Rondell , he seems cool , remarkably 😁 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBass Posted September 4, 2021 Share Posted September 4, 2021 (edited) 9 hours ago, lurksalot said: That’ll be Ronnie Rondell , he seems cool , remarkably 😁 Wow! Googling 'Ronnie Rondell' I see it was real! I had assumed the flames had been added afterwards by some clever bloke developing the photo. He lost his eyebrows and part of his moustache doing that shoot. Edited September 4, 2021 by BillyBass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neepheid Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 He's not giving up... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-59993244 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_b Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Yet another person after a payday via the US court system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezbass Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 Given the price of bringing a private lawsuit, twice in this case, he plainly has too much money already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDaddy Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 15 minutes ago, ezbass said: Given the price of bringing a private lawsuit, twice in this case, he plainly has too much money already. It could be no win no fee, or pro bono. Although I can't imagine that a lawyer would take a case for no payment, in the hope of an early settlement to avoid bad publicity (etc) for a celebrity(celebrities), but then has to pursue as they are in too deep as the celebrity refuses to settle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleabag Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 "Elden's claim that the photograph on the Nevermind album cover is 'child pornography' is, on its face, not serious," their lawyers said, noting that anyone who owned a copy of the record would "on Elden's theory [be] guilty of felony possession of child pornography". They added that, until recently, Elden had seemed to enjoy the notoriety of being the "Nirvana baby". "He has re-enacted the photograph in exchange for a fee, many times; he has had the album title... tattooed across his chest; he has appeared on a talk show wearing a self-parodying, nude-colored onesie; he has autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay; and he has used the connection to try to pick up women," they said. He's a Dollar hunter - nothing more 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimR Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 https://www.basschat.co.uk/topic/459125-maybe-everyone-in-the-usa-isnt-dim-after-all/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 21 hours ago, fleabag said: "Elden's claim that the photograph on the Nevermind album cover is 'child pornography' is, on its face, not serious," their lawyers said, noting that anyone who owned a copy of the record would "on Elden's theory [be] guilty of felony possession of child pornography". They added that, until recently, Elden had seemed to enjoy the notoriety of being the "Nirvana baby". "He has re-enacted the photograph in exchange for a fee, many times; he has had the album title... tattooed across his chest; he has appeared on a talk show wearing a self-parodying, nude-colored onesie; he has autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay; and he has used the connection to try to pick up women," they said. He's a Dollar hunter - nothing more Bloke's a dreamer. On the basis of the above, I don't think he stands a chance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleabag Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 I hope that is the case. He doesnt deserve a cent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_b Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 You can never be sure with the US legal system. That's why so many chancers bring spurious court cases and why no win no fee started up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 And the only winners are the shyster lawyers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tauzero Posted January 16, 2022 Share Posted January 16, 2022 2 hours ago, Rich said: And the only winners are the shyster lawyers. And possibly the pen1s enlargement companies. Of course, he could say the water was cold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.