Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 27/08/2021 at 09:22, BillyBass said:

 reckon this will start an avalanche of law suits of similarly abused individuals by exploitive bands

PHOTO-2021-08-27-08-53-55.jpg

That’ll be Ronnie Rondell , he seems cool , remarkably 😁

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, lurksalot said:

That’ll be Ronnie Rondell , he seems cool , remarkably 😁

Wow!  Googling 'Ronnie Rondell' I see it was real!  I had assumed the flames had been added afterwards by some clever bloke developing the photo.  He lost his eyebrows and part of his moustache doing that shoot.

Edited by BillyBass
  • 4 months later...
Posted
15 minutes ago, ezbass said:

Given the price of bringing a private lawsuit, twice in this case, he plainly has too much money already.

 

It could be no win no fee, or pro bono. Although I can't imagine that a lawyer would take a case for no payment, in the hope of an early settlement to avoid bad publicity (etc) for a celebrity(celebrities), but then has to pursue as they are in too deep as the celebrity refuses to settle.

Posted

"Elden's claim that the photograph on the Nevermind album cover is 'child pornography' is, on its face, not serious," their lawyers said, noting that anyone who owned a copy of the record would "on Elden's theory [be] guilty of felony possession of child pornography".

They added that, until recently, Elden had seemed to enjoy the notoriety of being the "Nirvana baby".

"He has re-enacted the photograph in exchange for a fee, many times; he has had the album title... tattooed across his chest; he has appeared on a talk show wearing a self-parodying, nude-colored onesie; he has autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay; and he has used the connection to try to pick up women," they said.

 

He's a Dollar hunter - nothing more

  • Like 2
Posted
21 hours ago, fleabag said:

"Elden's claim that the photograph on the Nevermind album cover is 'child pornography' is, on its face, not serious," their lawyers said, noting that anyone who owned a copy of the record would "on Elden's theory [be] guilty of felony possession of child pornography".

They added that, until recently, Elden had seemed to enjoy the notoriety of being the "Nirvana baby".

"He has re-enacted the photograph in exchange for a fee, many times; he has had the album title... tattooed across his chest; he has appeared on a talk show wearing a self-parodying, nude-colored onesie; he has autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay; and he has used the connection to try to pick up women," they said.

 

He's a Dollar hunter - nothing more

 

Bloke's a dreamer. On the basis of the above, I don't think he stands a chance. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Rich said:

And the only winners are the shyster lawyers. 

 

And possibly the pen1s enlargement companies. Of course, he could say the water was cold.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...