Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've got a couple of basses which came with 45, 65, 80, 100 strings and I've historically used 45, 65, 85, 105.  But it kinda grinds with my rural Scottish tightness to whip off brand new, perfectly serviceable strings for the sake of a tiny increase in string size on two of them.  Am I being mad?

Posted

I notice not the feel but the sound difference between those two sets of gauges and would definitely be doing that swap. In fact, have done that swap with very fresh strings.

Posted

The real question is, are you dissatisfied with the current feel and/or tone of the basses at the moment? If you didn’t *know* the gauge of the strings currently on them, would you have any gripes?
 

If so, replace ‘em and sell the old strings to someone here on Basschat.

Posted
7 hours ago, neepheid said:

I've got a couple of basses which came with 45, 65, 80, 100 strings and I've historically used 45, 65, 85, 105.  But it kinda grinds with my rural Scottish tightness to whip off brand new, perfectly serviceable strings for the sake of a tiny increase in string size on two of them.  Am I being mad?

given that different makes will have different tension anyway. aye, unless you can tell the difference and you're being a bit mad. 

Posted

I prefer 45-100s as you can get more bass onto the G & D without swamping the E & A and making them too boomy. Especially on a Precision where the pickup placement puts the thinner strings over the nearer to the bridge pickup, helps to balance it out a bit.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, CameronJ said:

The real question is, are you dissatisfied with the current feel and/or tone of the basses at the moment? If you didn’t *know* the gauge of the strings currently on them, would you have any gripes?
 

If so, replace ‘em and sell the old strings to someone here on Basschat.

This ^^^
 

2 hours ago, Lozz196 said:

I prefer 45-100s as you can get more bass onto the G & D without swamping the E & A and making them too boomy. Especially on a Precision where the pickup placement puts the thinner strings over the nearer to the bridge pickup, helps to balance it out a bit.

 

This has always been my approach to string gauge choice.

Posted
On 27/08/2021 at 12:28, Lozz196 said:

I prefer 45-100s as you can get more bass onto the G & D without swamping the E & A and making them too boomy

 

I thought it went this way: if the E & A go up a notch of size, they have to go up a notch of tension, and that makes them brighter and less boomy?

 

When I tried Rotosound 66s at 45 65 80 105, that A string seemed to be more bassy, less vivid.

Posted

Stay with me!  I know this is 'guitar string' related in the video but well worth a watch for those who have always assumed thicker strings, more tension, more/tighter bass!  

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...