Boodang Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 (edited) Anybody remember the old Magnum basses? I loved them especially the early I & II which had a really interesting body shape. Obviously too radical as they changed it for something more normal (as above) for versions III & IV. Came across this one the other day and have been procrastinating so it's probably gone, but an interesting version. I'm not a fan of bolt on necks so was quite intrigued to see they did a set neck on this prototype, and just left the '4 coil' pickup in the hot spot. Played these a few times back in the day (always someone else's) and always wanted one, then a while ago I bought one on ebay while I was living abroad. Unfortunately personal circumstances took a turn and I never picked it up or got it delivered (I know!!) so never saw it (or got my money back but the least of my issues at the time!). So, an unfulfilled dream but maybe the reality of the real thing would be a let down? You should never meet your heroes! Edited December 5, 2021 by Boodang 1 Quote
Bridgehouse Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 I always wondered about the dining-table sized pickups in them and whether or not they actually sounded any good... Quote
Boodang Posted December 5, 2021 Author Posted December 5, 2021 (edited) The large neck pickup had 4 individual coils and was quite fat sounding, although the position of it had a lot to do with that. It had individual trim pots for each coil, I believe Bassculture make a version of it. The rear pickup on the original was not a single coil but a hum canceling split coil. Edited December 5, 2021 by Boodang Quote
Happy Jack Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 16 minutes ago, Bridgehouse said: I always wondered about the dining-table sized pickups in them and whether or not they actually sounded any good... Yup, they do. Set correctly, these are huge-sounding basses. Quote
Bridgehouse Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 Just now, Happy Jack said: Yup, they do. Set correctly, these are huge-sounding basses. Are they big hum buckers, or dual buckers or some sort of wide range jobs? Quote
Bridgehouse Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 11 minutes ago, Boodang said: The large neck pickup had 4 individual coils and was quite fat sounding, although the position of it had a lot to do with that. It had individual trim pots for each coil, I believe Bassculture make a version of it. The rear pickup on the original was not a single coil but a hum canceling split coil. Ah - I missed you post! 4 individual coils? Interesting... Quote
Happy Jack Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 Oooof! Too technical for me ... I think of them as very big mud-buckers, though that's pretty harsh! Essentially the set up is a bit of a P/J thing. I use the big mudbucker as my main source, but dial in (God I hate that expression!) some of the bridge pickup for extra bite. 1 Quote
Bridgehouse Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 I've never had a bass with a mud-bucker (or similar) in. Sometimes I wonder if a tele bass with a right-against-the-neck pickup or a Gibbo EB0 might be a worthwhile investment. Mind you, that Ovation does look rather snazzy.. Quote
Happy Jack Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 If you were closer to London, I'd suggest coming over and trying them both - I have a Mk.II and a Mk.IV. Quote
Bridgehouse Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 7 minutes ago, Happy Jack said: If you were closer to London, I'd suggest coming over and trying them both - I have a Mk.II and a Mk.IV. Very kind. Yeah, I’d like to try something like that at some point, but I’m not travelling much at the moment… Maybe next year when I’m out and about more. 1 Quote
Shaggy Posted December 5, 2021 Posted December 5, 2021 Looks like they were going for a Stingray vibe with that one, though it’s from 1980 the Magnum was pretty much extinct by then - shame, as they were lovely basses with design features ahead of their time. As far as I’m aware the 1 - 4 models actually had glued in set necks too, they just also had a “belt and braces” bolted neck plate. Quote
Boodang Posted December 5, 2021 Author Posted December 5, 2021 Unfortunately by having the bolted neck plate you end up with a bulky joint rather than the sculpted joint of the set only neck. That's why I'm particularly taken by the prototype. Quote
Boodang Posted December 5, 2021 Author Posted December 5, 2021 Just reread the ad for this bass... according to the post this prototype was designed to compete with the Peavey basses of the day hence the prefix PF stood for Peavey f**ker! Don't know if there's any basis in truth but still amusing. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.