NikNik Posted January 4, 2022 Posted January 4, 2022 2 hours ago, T-Bay said: Dave’s hair is criminal in that pic Looks like Michael 'Two Haircuts' Bolton. 1 Quote
paul_5 Posted January 4, 2022 Posted January 4, 2022 Wow. 2022 is off to a flying start - two racially abusive threads already. Come on people, we're better than this. 2 1 Quote
Lozz196 Posted January 4, 2022 Posted January 4, 2022 Yep, let’s get a third up & running Wrote in jest for those not well versed in irony & sarcasm 3 7 Quote
NikNik Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 6 hours ago, paul_5 said: Wow. 2022 is off to a flying start - two racially abusive threads already. Come on people, we're better than this. Given that I detect no irony in your post, you're actually saying the OP is 'racially abusive'? How so? 1 Quote
ubit Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 It wouldn't be racist anyway American isn't a race. It's xenophobic if anything. 4 Quote
dclaassen Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 American here, reside in the U.K… just got back from a fortnight in the US…OP is pretty accurate…definitely not offended…:) 10 1 4 Quote
lownote Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) They're actually quite clever. After all they just (so far) successfully made a world class telescope out of lego, string and cling film Edited January 5, 2022 by lownote 1 3 Quote
Supernaut Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 Don't understand the thread title. Brits regularly show similar levels of stupidity. Like the usual "All Americans are fat" jibe. Brits are right up there with them now. 3 Quote
fleabag Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 Back to the lawsuit - how was the baby exploited ? Surely the parents gave permission, in which case the grown baby is just after some easy dollars. Glad it was rejected. Nobhead 3 Quote
ubit Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 The guy has milked this all of his life and then obviously thought I can make some money here. If he should be suing anyone surely it would be his parents. 4 Quote
PaulWarning Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 6 hours ago, NikNik said: Given that I detect no irony in your post, you're actually saying the OP is 'racially abusive'? How so? well I suppose it's racist against Americans, if the same thing had been said about, say, West Indians all hell would break loose 1 Quote
Bolo Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 8 minutes ago, PaulWarning said: well I suppose it's racist against Americans, if the same thing had been said about, say, West Indians all hell would break loose Americans are not a race. 4 Quote
PaulWarning Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 7 minutes ago, Bolo said: Americans are not a race. I suppose it's how you define race, are the West Indians a race? or are they Black Africans? I not sure, I'm not being woke here btw, I get offended by people being offended, just trying to point out double standards Quote
Newfoundfreedom Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 You can't really say all Americans are dim anyway. Like the UK, it's only actually about 50 percent. 1 Quote
TimR Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, fleabag said: Back to the lawsuit - how was the baby exploited ? Surely the parents gave permission, in which case the grown baby is just after some easy dollars. Glad it was rejected. Nobhead He claimed it was child sex abuse and akin to child pornography and suffered for years because of it. Thrown out on two counts: 1. Statue of limitations had expired. 2. Claims of psychological damage were spurious. The judge also ruled that since practically everyone in the world had viewed the image and no one else has ever raised an issue, it couldn't possibly be now ruled as a pornographic image. Edited January 5, 2022 by TimR Quote
TimR Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 1 hour ago, Newfoundfreedom said: You can't really say all Americans are dim anyway. Like the UK, it's only actually about 50 percent. It's about 80% if you subscribe to the Pareto Principle, which I'm finding increasingly accurate as I grow older. Quote
TimR Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, PaulWarning said: I suppose it's how you define race It's usually how the law defines protected characteristic. Being American isn't one of them but discriminating against someone based on their nationality is. Edited January 5, 2022 by TimR 1 Quote
cetera Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 Gotta love the 'offence appropriation' that seems to be the norm these days *facepalm* 6 Quote
Jason Karloff Posted January 5, 2022 Author Posted January 5, 2022 I know it worries me how fragile and delicate people are these days. How quick they are to throw themselves to the floor in a faux fit of tears and persecution. How does the fat ginger kid survive in a class room these days?) I love them septics. They gave us 50% of Laurel and Hardy. Even better 100% of Harold Lloyd. Ok they have spawned Marjorie Taylor Greene but hey yin-yang, snakes and ladders and all that. Anyway what numpty lead with such a provocative title? sigh. Quote
TimR Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Jason Karloff said: I know it worries me how fragile and delicate people are these days. People have always been fragile and delicate. Just nowadays we don't expect them to have to endure years of name calling, bullying and repression... Edited January 5, 2022 by TimR 3 Quote
cetera Posted January 5, 2022 Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) The only people I see being 'offended' are those who aren't the actual people being jokingly mentioned... 🙄 Edited January 5, 2022 by cetera 3 Quote
.jpg.518c69c2d9e1581799f3c11301dc2da5.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.