Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

What defines a bass guitar?


Joe Nation
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've been pondering a bit in recent days about ultra-short scale basses (eg Wingbass), uke-basses, Bass VIs, baritones etc. It got me thinking, is there a general agreement of what exactly makes a bass, a bass? I guess having 4 strings and a 34" scale is the most common variant, but there are plenty of things with more strings (or fewer?) and both longer and shorter scale lengths, that are most definitely a bass. But to me a Bass VI seems more like a guitar that just plays lower notes than standard tuning (to be fair I don't really know how you play one or what it sounds like!).

 

Is it purely about the frequency of the notes an instrument can play - in which case do you measure the lowest note, the lowest C, the highest note, an octave above the lowest, the average? Is it more to do with what instruments you're playing alongside, with the bass being whatever is lowest in the group? Do we define it by the part it plays in the band - that magical link between rhythm and melody? Or is it simply some unquantifiable, unmeasurable property - this is a bass because we call it is a bass?

 

Furthermore, with a Wingbass being effectively the upper half of a conventional 4-string 34" bass, could you fit a thicker gauge of string to lower the frequency of the notes and go a whole octave lower (ie the same pitch as an open string on a 34" scale)? The gauge required may be far too thick to fit in the bridge or tuners, and may be unplayable, I'm curious if it's possible though. Is there a formula linking string length, gauge and resultant frequency (assuming the same material of course)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By your initial definition, I don't play bass as I use a 5-string in one band and a Bass VI in my other.

 

Where do you place post-punk "bass" players like Peter Hook and others who rarely venture below what could be done on a drop-D tuned guitar yet choose to play a bass rather than a  guitar? What about all those down-tuned metal bands with their 7 and 8-string guitars? What about bands where the keyboards or some other instrument (not bass guitar) takes to low register parts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historically the bass (tuba etc.) has been the lowest sounding instrument. But nowadays we have multi string instruments, we have piccolo strings, short scales, synthesizers and so on. I think that if you use your instrument like bass, it is a bass. The form or the design does not hinder us, bassists.

 

(By the way, check g-word players, most of whom are doomed to play only Stratos, Teles, and LesPauls. Maybe there is some Youngster trying to play an SG, or even a PRSantana, but those instruments may be too radical in the long run.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't we over thinking this? Surely its just a member of the guitar family intended for playing the bass part?  That encompasses the numerous variants quite neatly.

 

Whether some people use it for true bass or as more of a baritone guitar doesn't really matter, its the physical archtecture and the intended use that define it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Boodang said:

For me the benchmark is the double bass where the low E is 41hz. After all the bass guitar is derived from this.

 

Yeah, it might be called a Bass Guitar, and look like a Guitar, but it's evolved from the Double Bass - that's it's DNA. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Downunderwonder said:

Funny how it takes a proper human to be a bass player but guitars and drums get played by all sorts of Troglodytes and Neanderthals and singers seem to be mostly lizard people out to amuse themselves before the big takeover.

 

According to guitarists we're the troglodytes who can't read or write and failed at guitar. 

Good drummers are definitely not troglodytes or neanderthals but there's a lot more bad drummers than good ones.

Singers are odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harmonically, whichever instrument is lowest pitched is the 'bass'. Instrumentally, the bass is derived from the double bass / violone which has what is known as 16' pitch rather than 8' (this is a reference to the length of the organ pipe that plays lowest C on an organ ,not the length of the string). 

 

The violone which is the ancestor of the double bass had six strings and tended to come in two variants pitched a 4th apart: a G violone and a D violone, with the D being lower. The G was tuned an octave below a tenor viol (GCFADG) and the D an octave below a standard bass (DGCEAD).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, itu said:

Historically the bass (tuba etc.) has been the lowest sounding instrument. But nowadays we have multi string instruments, we have piccolo strings, short scales, synthesizers and so on. I think that if you use your instrument like bass, it is a bass. The form or the design does not hinder us, bassists.

 

(By the way, check g-word players, most of whom are doomed to play only Stratos, Teles, and LesPauls. Maybe there is some Youngster trying to play an SG, or even a PRSantana, but those instruments may be too radical in the long run.)

As a serial bass and guitar purchaser I SHOULD agree with you regarding the g-word bit, but if I could get a bass that gave the flexibility and variety of tones I get from my 79 Strat I would be a very happy man indeed. And even my stupidly cheap Tele clone (try less than £100 including Artec pickups and all bought new) does a great range of sounds. I have others as well and am looking for a Les Paul, just coz, you know but could happily live with just the Strat.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bassfinger said:

Aren't we over thinking this? Surely its just a member of the guitar family intended for playing the bass part?  That encompasses the numerous variants quite neatly.

 

Whether some people use it for true bass or as more of a baritone guitar doesn't really matter, its the physical archtecture and the intended use that define it.

Despite it being called a 'bass guitar' I always think of it as a solid body version of a double bass, so an extension of the violin family not the guitar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Boodang said:

Despite it being called a 'bass guitar' I always think of it as a solid body version of a double bass, so an extension of the violin family not the guitar.

In terms of inspriation I would agree wholeheartedly.  However, in terms of construction and the ,anner in which it is held and played  it is very much a member of the guitar family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bassfinger said:

Although a surprising number of bassists, like myself, are accomplished guitar players.

 

I read something online from a guitarist who said he will respect bassists when he meets one who can play barre chords. I guess 95% of bassists can play them but why would you use them on a bass?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SumOne said:

 

Yeah, it might be called a Bass Guitar, and look like a Guitar, but it's evolved from the Double Bass - that's it's DNA. 

Depends. If you consider Leo's creation to be the first true bass guitar (and realistically it was) then it's very much a hybrid of the two, and clearly takes the larger proportion of its DNA from its 6-string forebear. It is intended to be played in a similar manner to a guitar, it has frets, its tuners, bridge, pickup etc are adaptations of those used on the Broadcaster & Tele, and so on.

 

On the other hand, the first electric bass, Paul Tutmarc's 1936 Electric Bass Fiddle seems more closely derived from the double bass - although fretted & designed to be played horizontally (I have an idea it could also be played upright, mounted on a long pin) Tutmarc didn't consider it a guitar - the clue's in the name. Tutmarc's bass was not a success so I think it's not known whether it was an influence on Fender - quite likely not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, robscott said:

Just play the darned thing, that's what it's for......

Well you could say that but you could also say why read a BC thread when you could be practicing!

Of course, by discussing what defines bass guitar you are digging into it's provenance and the wider question of how we see its role in music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...