Al Krow Posted January 12 Author Posted January 12 RCF have launched the NXL 14A speaker. Looks innovative! Quote
warwickhunt Posted January 12 Posted January 12 1 hour ago, Al Krow said: RCF have launched the NXL 14A speaker. Looks innovative! I'd like to hear those! Quote
JPJ Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 hours ago, Al Krow said: RCF have launched the NXL 14A speaker. Looks innovative! I like the look of the 44A - 3x10 that allegedly goes down to 45Hz. Could be a solution to my single box per side ambition. However, I don’t like the look of the price 😬 Quote
warwickhunt Posted January 12 Posted January 12 45 minutes ago, JPJ said: I like the look of the 44A - 3x10 that allegedly goes down to 45Hz. Could be a solution to my single box per side ambition. However, I don’t like the look of the price 😬 Our sub is 30% lighter than one of those and our pair of 10" QSC tops are lighter than one of those... no gains in weight or ease of transport but I'm 100% sure they'll sound great! Quote
Greg Edwards69 Posted January 12 Posted January 12 9 hours ago, JPJ said: I like the look of the 44A - 3x10 that allegedly goes down to 45Hz. Could be a solution to my single box per side ambition. However, I don’t like the look of the price 😬 I had a pair of Wemm 4x10 columns many years ago in my first band. I can t remember what happened to them. I sometimes wonder how well they would perform with a modern system. Quote
Chienmortbb Posted January 13 Posted January 13 13 hours ago, Greg Edwards69 said: I had a pair of Wemm 4x10 columns many years ago in my first band. I can t remember what happened to them. I sometimes wonder how well they would perform with a modern system. Probably better than you think, although there will not be a lot of either top or bottom. That sounds like a contradiction but the 4x12s stacked vertically aim the beam and those early 12s, rated at only 25-30 watts went higher than most modern 12s. Quote
Greg Edwards69 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 7 minutes ago, Chienmortbb said: Probably better than you think, although there will not be a lot of either top or bottom. That sounds like a contradiction but the 4x12s stacked vertically aim the beam and those early 12s, rated at only 25-30 watts went higher than most modern 12s. Correction, yes, they must have been 4x12 stacks - my memory is hazy, it was over 30 years ago! And it was Wem, not Wemm. Quote
warwickhunt Posted January 13 Posted January 13 15 minutes ago, Greg Edwards69 said: Correction, yes, they must have been 4x12 stacks - my memory is hazy, it was over 30 years ago! And it was Wem, not Wemm. Don't correct yourself too quickly... When I was a teenager I pulled a pair of Wem column speakers (my first foray into amplifying an instrument) out of a bin and they could well have been 10" or LESS! Quote
Chienmortbb Posted January 13 Posted January 13 5 minutes ago, warwickhunt said: Don't correct yourself too quickly... When I was a teenager I pulled a pair of Wem column speakers (my first foray into amplifying an instrument) out of a bin and they could well have been 10" or LESS! Wem did both 4x10 and 4x12 columns. Quote
Greg Edwards69 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 1 hour ago, warwickhunt said: Don't correct yourself too quickly... When I was a teenager I pulled a pair of Wem column speakers (my first foray into amplifying an instrument) out of a bin and they could well have been 10" or LESS! We acquired ours from our old CO when my brother and I were in the Air Cadets. He mentioned he had a couple of PA speakers that he wanted to get rid of, and if we could collect them we could have them for nothing. Thank goodness our dad had a Volvo estate! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.