Monster sigs

[fleabag]

Is this rediculous ?

Yes it is.  This really needs to be curbed. Give people an inch..

 

 

[Woodinblack]

If you click on the x in someones sig, you can choose to hide theirs or all sigs. I routinely hide any sig that is more than a couple of lines of text long, and pretty well anything with a photo (as it wrecks the flow of the text in a thread).

[Downunderwonder]

I must have tagged no sigs when I signed up, because I had no idea what you were banging on about.

[BreadBin]

I use my phone to browse - sigs only show in landscape so I don't see them.

Having flipped to check I agree that the example posted is ludicrous. Most forums I've used in the past have a limit - one photo of a sensible size.

[MacDaddy]

9 hours ago, Downunderwonder said:

I must have tagged no sigs when I signed up, because I had no idea what you were banging on about.

 

 

Me too. No sigs being seen here.

[Reggaebass]

I hide almost all signatures except the mod’s ones which you can’t individually hide 

[ezbass]

I selected no sigs years ago and I’ve not felt the need to switch it back on. 

[paul_5]

 Gave up sigs twenty years ago.

 

some of them were indeed ‘monsters’, and occasionally I think about starting again, but it’s prohibitively expensive these days.

[fleabag]

Its a rediculous amount of real estate. Uncheck to see what i mean, but yes , i've done the hide sig thingy.

 

Trouble is with hiding them is that some people have sales in their sigs, but i guess thats just hard luck on them and us