Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'd have to counter by saying it's not cheap, nor is it nice. 

 

That kind of finish always looks extremely cheap and tacky to me. It reminds me of all those 80's budget basses and guitars that were trying to look much flashier than they actually were. 

 

Give me plain colour or natural wood any day. 

 

  • Like 3
Posted
3 hours ago, prowla said:

Is that one of the ones with the stick-on quilted top?

I was thinking that it was a proper quilt maple top but looking at the pics it may be a stick-on top....

Posted
1 hour ago, vinorange said:

I was thinking that it was a proper quilt maple top but looking at the pics it may be a stick-on top....

Fender did some with it lacquered over.

Posted

One of the few occasions I've ever looked at anything with 'Fender' on the end & gone "WANT THAT ONE!"

 

Not sure who makes Japanese Fenders these days, but if the old rules still apply, MIJ = Fujigen. And it was them responsible for the FotoFlame stickers... :ph34r:

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Bassassin said:

One of the few occasions I've ever looked at anything with 'Fender' on the end & gone "WANT THAT ONE!"

 

Exactly what I thought when I saw it.

Posted
On 31/01/2023 at 08:43, Newfoundfreedom said:

I'd have to counter by saying it's not cheap, nor is it nice. 

 

That kind of finish always looks extremely cheap and tacky to me. It reminds me of all those 80's budget basses and guitars that were trying to look much flashier than they actually were. 

 

Give me plain colour or natural wood any day. 

 

100% agree. I shudder when I see flame maple tops on exotic basses as it almost always will look tacky or remind me of tacky instruments...

  • Like 1
Posted

Because this bridge works great with these Fender basses and many others.

 

Each time I've put another bridge, I simply noticed that it adds strictly nothing sound wise to that BBOT bridge.

 

Simplicity is often the best way to achieve a goal.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Hellzero said:

Because this bridge works great with these Fender basses and many others.

 

Each time I've put another bridge, I simply noticed that it adds strictly nothing sound wise to that BBOT bridge.

 

Simplicity is often the best way to achieve a goal.


I'm not talking about sound, I'm talking more about tuning stability and more scope for intonation. I'd go as far to say that nobody could tell the difference in sound between a BBOT and a Hi-Mass bridge.

Posted
1 hour ago, WHUFC BASS said:

For that sort of money, I'd at least want a hi-mass bridge on it. Why do Fender still persist with the BBOT, even on their high-end basses?

I did say it wasn't cheap.....but  how much extra would a Fender high mass Bridge have been? £20. No brainer for what they intend to be high end bass really.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...