Rubbed down to create unusual finish.....

[BetaFunk]

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234916609734?hash=item36b21efec6:g:8sgAAOSwvqJj~0h-&amdata=enc%3AAQAHAAAAkGPu2g8VkkKuDtNNqAA90fs014VoaDcVOR%2FG8lBD9om3ER3AyAM0EiCR0b%2BL0l6gfgGpUOFVGcFipRhZOaPhmLwDKV1qlCXKCXUHr8owFu%2Fv4Hh%2FLcghNISq2Z6OjgjmXGEZmmMedyhiWYMd4Syk50zxB1YOBk3csnnQQ%2F1tDGKhdy9kAFzAzJ5qYXvn8AHfew%3D%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8TgycbUYQ

[Beedster]

That bass reminds me of that classic interview summary "The candidate appeared to hit rock bottom but just kept digging anyway". The guy with the sandpaper must have thought "Mmm, not sure this is going well....".

 

But flip me, he kept on sanding didn't he  

[Orbs]

Well he certainly created 'the unusual finish' he so desired!....😀

[Thor]

“used...not ubused...lightly gigged”

 

I'd hate to think what he considers 'Roadworn'!?

[3below]

Always liked the look of the Starcaster bass until this one.

[JohnH89]

A coat of wax and I think it would look OK . Better than a lot of relic jobs anyway .

[Waddo Soqable]

You could just paint it again I suppose

[Beedster]

If it's ply as he says could he have done more than just flip the aesthetics?

[yorks5stringer]

One word: 'Why"?

[TheGreek]

Summed up perfectly.

[Jean-Luc Pickguard]

Poor bass :o(

 

Quote

“used...not ubused...lightly gigged”

 

Surely sanding right through the top ply of the top is abuse

Edited March 3, 2023 by Jean-Luc Pickguard

[MichaelDean]

This Starcaster logo is also abuse. The only way that could be worse would be if it was in comic sans!